Category Archives: Presidential Candidates

HUCK THE SCHMUCK

HUCK THE SCHMUCK


by Alan Stang
December 27, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

I had thought that by now we knew
everything about Mike Huckabee: the love of more and higher taxes, the
betrayal of home schooling, the parole of the man who then raped and killed
another woman, the attempt to bring as many illegal aliens to Arkansas as possible,
et cetera and so on. Of course, I was horribly wrong.

Now come revelations that penetrate
to the heart of the man, which he says is the fact that he is a preacher of
Christ, except of course that his own staff now admits he was lying when he
kept boasting he was the only candidate on the stage with a
“theology
degree.
” Remember his smart aleck offer to
help Ghouliani when the moderator asked the Ghoul about his spiritual beliefs
in the debates?

Because I have lived so long and
seen so much, I am not easy to shock. But Huckabee has done so. As you know,
one of the main differences between him and the other man from Hope, Arkansas
–
I can
’t recall his name; he is the husband
of Hillaroid
– is the musical instrument they
play. The other man plays the sexaphone (sic); Huck plays the guitar. Indeed,
Huck plays guitar in a group called Capitol Offense. One of the numbers they
do is
“Honky Tonk Women.”
Here are some of the lyrics:

I met a gin soaked, bar-room queen
in Memphis,
She tried to take me upstairs for a ride.
She had to heave me right across her shoulder
’Cause
I just can
’t seem to drink you off my mind.

I laid a divorcee in New York City,
I had to put up some kind of a fight.
The lady then she covered me with roses,
She blew my nose and then she blew my mind.

So, what do we have here? We have a
man drinking to excess in a Memphis whore house to get a woman off his mind.
We have an alcoholic whore trying to turn a trick. Because he is mourning the
loss of the first woman, the whore has to drag him upstairs to a bedroom for
the purpose. Presumably, she could do so only because Friar Huck had already
lost those famous hundred pounds in preparation for his presidential race. No
normal woman, and certainly not a gin-soaked whore, could lift a thing the
size of Huckabee before.

The narrator thankfully survives the
night of abandon. The next stanza finds him in New York. He is still
lamenting the loss of the unnamed lady in Memphis, because in New York
another lady, a divorcee, has to struggle to bring Huck the Schmuck to her
bed. The lady blows his nose, which sounds disgusting and then blows his
mind. I shall say no more here because the verb
“blows”
comes dangerously close to the area patented by the other man from Hope, the
one whose name I can
’t remember.

Of course, “Honky
Tonk Women
” is a Mick Jagger/Rolling Stones
song. To do it justice, Huckabee
’s Capitol Offense presumably had to
practice, singing these words over and over again. Excuse me? Remember we are
not talking here about some difference in doctrine. We
’re
not talking about different interpretations of Original Sin. We
’re
talking about the personal behavior of a preacher, a minister of Christ. Will
Huck the Schmuck be performing
“Honky Tonk Women”
in the Huckabee White House?

Capitol Offense appears to have a
penchant for professional hookers. Another number they do is
“Devil
With the Blue Dress On.
” Here are some of the lyrics: “She
walks real cool, catches everybody’s eye/She’s got such good lovin’ that they
can’t say goodbye.
” There is also the immortal:

Good golly, Miss Molly
You sure like to ball
While you’re rockin’ and rollin’
Can’t you hear your mama call
From the early, early mornin’ ’til the early, early nights
See Miss Molly rockin’ at the House of Blue Lights

Notice that unlike every other
minister of Jesus I have heard of, Huck the Schmuck does not lament the fact
that these women are prostitutes and try to reform them. On the contrary,
Capitol Offense celebrates and applauds their prostitution. Huckabee apparently
will do anything to look
“cool.”

Needless to say, the Prostitute
National Press has not said a word about this. Instead, they have tried
(unsuccessfully) to make something of the fact that Tucker Carlson booby
trapped Dr. Ron Paul into accepting a donation from a man he didn
’t
know who runs a brothel in Nevada. By the way, Dr. No plays no instrument and
can
’t carry a tune.


Advertisement

But now here comes something even
worse. What? Worse? Yes! In 2004, at a dinner meeting of the Republican
Governors Association, Huckabee mounted the rostrum to deliver the opening
prayer. You would ask the only man present with a
“theology
degree
” to do that. As the schmuck got
started, the mobile phone in his pocket rang. And an
“embarrassed”
Governor Huckabee took the call. Guess who it was.

It was God

That’s right; God took
time out from His manifold activities to call Friar Huck as he began his
remarks. Either that, or Huck was doing an impression of Bob Newhart, in
which case his impression was masterful; but I saw the video and can assure
you that was not what he was doing. He was using the
“theology
degree
” he now is lying about to drive home
the
“fact” that, despite
the hymns to prostitution of Capitol Offense, he was the only governor the
Creator would call.

As brilliant as he was, Friar Huck
did miss one trick. He should have had God call collect. Then Huck could
magnanimously have accepted the charges. On the other hand, the charges from
Heaven to here are probably prohibitive, and everyone knows God has unlimited
funds insured by FDIC, so He probably would pay for such a call Himself. Here
are the main things the other governors
– rotten, no-good sinners who
therefore don
’t get calls from God –
heard Friar Huck say:

On the phone for me? How did he get
my number? . . . . Yes, God? Yes, sir, I
’m right in the middle of the
president
’s coming. . . . . You see, you say
you want
–you need an autograph. Oh, for
Samson. . . . And, you know, God, this is a pretty big event. We
’ve
got a lot of people and I
’ve only got a very short time here.
Oh, you
’ve got all the time in the world. I
understand. . . . Yes, sir, we know you don
’t take sides in
the election. But, if you did, we kind of think you
’d
hang in there with us, lord, we really do. . . .

The transcript says there was much
delighted laughter during all of this. At the end there was (CHEERING AND
APPLAUSE). When I heard about it, I gasped. When I saw the video I marveled.
Notice that Huckabee revoltingly trivializes God. He patronizes God, reducing
Him to a Straight Man in a comedy act. This is not the God I know, not the
Creator of everything that is, not the God who spoke the world into
existence. Am I wrong? Am I making more of this than it deserves? I don
’t
think so, but please let me know.

More proof that Huck the Schmuck
thinks Christianity is a joke came after the people of Arizona enacted a law
(Proposition 200) that denies benefits to illegal aliens. The courts upheld
Prop 200 and a couple of Republican Senators in Arkansas proposed a similar
law there. The Arkansas law would have required proof of citizenship to vote.

But Huck denounced the proposal as
“race-baiting and demagoguery.” He said the bill
“inflames
those who are racist and bigots and makes them think there’s a real problem.
But there’s not.
” So, in Arkansas, Huck says illegal
aliens are not a problem, even when they vote. Now, running for President, he
says the reverse.

But here comes the kicker. Fellow
Republican Senator Jim Holt, one of the bill
’s sponsors, is
also a Christian. Singling him out, Governor Schmuck said as follows:
“I
drink a different kind of Jesus juice.
” Again we see that, in Huckabee’s
lexicon, Jesus is a joke, a Straight Man in a comedy act, a dummy sitting on
Huckabee
’s knee. The Schmuck will do or say
anything in his lust to be
“cool.” But English
speakers will remember that
“cool” means “not
so hot.
”

When I saw the Huck and his Straight
Man go through his act, I wondered. Are there really any Americans dumb
enough to fall for this malarkey, dumb enough to give credence to a man who
makes Elmer Gantry look like John the Baptist? The answer is, yes, there are
millions of them. Many of those millions belong to what they call the
Religious Right.

This time around, despite everything
we now know, Friar Huck is their choice. So I have only one question for you.
Are you out of your minds? Dr. Ron Paul exemplifies to the max everything you
say you believe. Mike Huckabee makes Dr. No look like a glorified combination
of Washington, Jefferson and Henry. But you have rejected Dr. Paul in favor
of a blatant scumbag.

Over and over again, you have
betrayed yourselves. You did it with Bush. He ridicules you as suckers in
private; in public he says he is
“born again.”
Apparently that is all a man need say to win your devotion. Because he is a
fraud, your country now is falling apart, soon to be merged out of existence
with Mexico and Canada. Your freedoms are gone.

Your
preachers are not preachers. They are motivational speakers, lusting for fame
and the buck. They are cowards, not Christians, not the Black Regiment that
led the War for Independence. If they tell you to vote for the rear end of a
horse, you will flock from the meeting halls to the polling places and do so,
like characters in George A. Romero
’s classic, “Night
of the Living Dead.
” Now you are getting ready to do it
again. And you will deserve everything you get when reality hits you in the
face.

© 2007 – Alan Stang – All Rights
Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails
are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale


Alan Stang was
one of Mike Wallace
’s original writers at Channel 13 in
New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has
been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head
nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many
listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of
feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for
which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania
House of Representatives for journalistic excellence. One of Stang
’s exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of
New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and
killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened.
Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation.

His first book,
It
’s Very Simple: The True Story of
Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest
Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars,
top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in
only one per cent of its reviews.

Stang has
lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many
top shows, including CNN
’s Cross Fire. Because he and his
wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they
lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in
“Havana,” directed by Sydney Pollack and
starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time).
Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the
pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it.

Website: AlanStang.com

E-Mail: stangfeedback@gmail.com


 


Rasmussen report on Huckster

<font color=black>
Rasmussen: ‘The Huckaboom
may have crested’

Pollster’s new results show
candidate tied in Iowa after double-digit lead





Posted:
December 20, 2007
12:07 p.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

With his support
receding in Iowa and South Carolina, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee’s surge
to the top of the race for the Republican presidential nomination appears to
have hit its high point, pollster Scott Rasmussen told WND.

“The Huckaboom
may have crested,” said Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports.

Yesterday, Rasmussen
released the results of a survey showing Huckabee falling back into a tie with Romney
in Iowa and South Carolina
.

In Iowa, Huckabee had
a double-digit lead at the beginning of December. The Rasmussen poll yesterday
showed him at 28 percent, with Romney at 27 percent and McCain in third at 14
percent.

Rasmussen cautioned
that the cresting of the Huckaboom should be seen in context.

“If a month and
a half ago I had told you that Huckabee was tied for the lead in Iowa and South
Carolina, that would have been seen as great news for the then-long-shot Huckabee
campaign,” he said.

What happened?

“Huckabee built
some support in Iowa, and then there was a huge round of enthusiasm as he built
a double-digit lead in Iowa and a significant lead in South Carolina,”
Rasmussen explained.

“But as Huckabee
surged, the other candidates began to take Huckabee seriously,” he
continued. “Then Huckabee began receiving a significant amount of negative
campaigning in Iowa and South Carolina, and the negative campaigning is now
having an impact.”

Does the endorsement by Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the
Minuteman Project help or hurt Huckabee?

“I think it will
help,” he answered cautiously. “But I don’t think it’s
definitive.”

“What’s
happening right now is Mike Huckabee is going through a vetting process that
other candidates went through earlier in the year,” he explained.
“There is no one piece of information that is going to be
definitive.”

Rasmussen said a
defining demographic for Huckabee was his strong support among evangelical
Christians.

“Huckabee went
from 48 percent support among evangelicals in late November, which was huge, up
to 62 percent a couple of weeks later, which was unbelievable,” he said.
“Now it’s back to 49 percent.”

Rasmussen said
Huckabee “resonates with certain constituencies and important parts of the
population in Iowa, but there was another tier that was a little bit softer and
they are re-evaluating.”

The pollster said
Huckabee’s Christmas ad would have helped him nationally if not for the
controversy that arose when critics accused his campaign of using subliminal
messaging by making a bookcase in the background appear as a cross.

Rasmussen admitted
his polling does not have direct data on the ad. He suspects that while it may
have helped Huckabee strengthen his Iowa support, it is clearly having a
negative impact outside the state.

“The Huckaboom
has retreated from its peak,” Rasmussen said. “I live by the beach,
so I tend to think in terms of tides. The Huckabee tide has pulled back from
its high point, but we don’t know yet who is going to win Iowa.”

To put Huckabee’s
rise in perspective, Rasmussen compared it to how Fred Thompson entered the
race.

“Earlier this
year, Fred Thompson looked good to outsiders,” he said. “As Thompson
entered the campaign, his numbers went down dramatically.”

Rasmussen told WND
the phenomena of Huckabee and Thompson show there is a serious level of
searching for an alternative among Republican primary voters.

“The conditions
remain right for a candidate to rise up and grab a section of the
constituency,” he concluded, “because none of the Republican primary
contenders has done so as yet.”

 

Huckabee/Globalist greed vs. Ron Paul/Constitutionalist/individualist


http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin420.htm

WHO ARE THESE KOOKS?

 

 

By
Pastor Chuck Baldwin

December
18, 2007

NewsWithViews.com

According to the Associated Press,
“Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul’s supporters raised over $6
million Sunday to boost the 10-term congressman’s campaign for the White
House.”

The AP report also said,
“The [Paul] campaign’s previous fundraiser brought in $4.2 million.”

According to the Paul campaign
website, “In a 24-hour period on December 16, the campaign raised $6.026
million dollars, surpassing the one-day record of $5.7 million held by John
Kerry.

“During the day, over
58,000 people contributed to Dr. Paul’s campaign, including 24,940 first-time
donors. Over 118,000 Americans have donated to the campaign in the fourth
quarter.

“The $6 million one-day
total means the campaign has raised over $18 million this quarter, far
exceeding its goal of $12 million.”

Now, if one listens to most of
the political pundits in the major media, Ron Paul is some kind of
“kook,” and his supporters are also a bunch of “kooks.” So,
the question must be asked, Just who are these kooks that are supporting him,
and where did they get all this money?

First, let’s take a look at this
“kook” who is receiving all this money. Ron Paul was born the third
son of Howard and Margaret Paul, and was brought up with a work ethic in which
one worked six days a week and went to church on Sunday. His first job was at
age 5 helping his uncle wash bottles. He worked all the way through his youth
mowing lawns, delivering newspapers, working in a drug store, delivering
furniture and laundry, etc.

In high school, Ron was a track
star, winning state as a junior in the 220-yard dash and running 2nd in the
440. His time in the 100-yard dash was 9.8. That’s pretty good. I was never
able to break 10-flat in the 100. Although, I bet I could have beaten him in
the 50-yard dash. He also wrestled in high school. Coincidentally, so did I.
But here Ron leaves me: he was president of the student council and an honor
student. I never accomplished that. I was just glad to get promoted to the next
grade. Even as a senior statesman, Ron Paul keeps himself in terrific shape.
Have you seen him lately? He still maintains a rigorous exercise regimen.

Ron’s two brothers are both
ministers, and he became a medical doctor. He graduated from Duke University
School of Medicine. When the Cuban Missile Crisis arose, Ron became a flight
surgeon in the U.S. Air Force. He also served in the Air National Guard.

As an OB/GYN physician, Dr. Paul
has delivered more than 4,000 babies, and he and his wife, Carol, have been
married for more than 50 years. They have 5 children, 18 grandchildren and 1
great-grandchild. Ron Paul is currently in his 10th term as a Congressman from
Texas.

As a congressman, Ron Paul has
never taken a government-paid junket. He is not accepting a government pension.
He returns a portion of his office budget every year to the taxpayers. As a
member of Congress, he has never voted a raise for himself. Do you know any
other member of Congress that can make such a claim? Of course you don’t,
because Ron Paul is truly one-of-a-kind.

Former President Ronald Reagan
said this about Ron Paul, “Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders
fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he
knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We
need to keep him fighting for our country.”

Perhaps this helps explain why
many of the “kooks” supporting Ron Paul are active-duty military
personnel. In fact, Ron Paul has received more campaign contributions from
active-duty military personnel than any other Presidential candidate from
either party.

But who are the other
“kooks” supporting Ron Paul? What kind of people give more than $18
million in a quarter-year to a Presidential candidate that is almost
universally ignored by the mainstream press? What kind of people give record
contributions to a Presidential candidate that is lampooned by his fellow
Republican presidential contenders?

For example, Mike Huckabee
recently said he could support any of the other Republican Presidential
contenders (including Rudy Giuliani), except Ron Paul. That means, Mike
Huckabee would rather support a pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-gun control
liberal such as Giuliani than support the pro-life, pro-traditional marriage,
pro-Second Amendment candidacy of Ron Paul. Why is that?

Furthermore, why are the entire
major media and establishment Republican machine either ignoring or lampooning
a distinguished Air Force veteran, medical doctor, and ten-term Congressman?
What is it about Ron Paul that the elite are so afraid of?

Advertisement

Here is something else: while
Ron Paul’s contributions have exploded, Mike Huckabee is all but broke! How can
that be? How can a political “front-runner” be out of money, while a
man who “doesn’t have a chance” is breaking fundraising records?

So, who are these
“kooks” who are sending Ron Paul so much money? And just why are they
sending him so much money? I will tell you who they are, because I am one of
them. They are rank-and-file, tax-paying citizens who are sick and tired of
out-of-control federal spending and deficits. They have had it with an arrogant
federal government that runs roughshod over both the Constitution and the
liberties of the American people. They are people who have had enough of the
IRS, the BATFE, and a thousand other federal agencies that have “erected a
multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our
people, and eat out their substance.” (Declaration of Independence)

They are people who see through
the phony, disingenuous federal politicians who only want to fleece the
American citizenry for the purpose of building their own personal fortunes.
They have had it with the Military-Industrial complex that desires to build
international empires at the expense of the blood and sacrifice of the American
people. They have had it with David Rockefeller and his Council on Foreign
Relations. They have had it with the arrogance of George W. Bush and Nancy
Pelosi.

They are sick and tired of
paying outlandish taxes for a public education system that produces high school
graduates who cannot read and write. They are sick and tired of working for 30
years to pay off a mortgage, only then to be forced to pay extortion money
(a.k.a. property taxes) for the rest of their lives to the feudal state. They
are sick and tired of the government telling them what they can and cannot do
with their own property. They are sick and tired of watching people with food
stamps buy T-bone steaks and expensive Nike tennis shoes while they are forced
to buy fatty hamburger and cheap sneakers.

They are sick and tired of
watching their manufacturing jobs go to China and India. They have had it with
money-hungry businessmen who hire illegal Mexicans at slave labor wages. They
have had it with labor unions promoting politicians who support NAFTA, CAFTA,
and the FTAA. They are sick and tired of being bled dry at the gas pump.

They have had it with this phony
“war on terrorism” that sends trillions of dollars to nations
throughout the Middle East, but refuses to close our own borders to illegal
immigration. They have had it with the “war on drugs” and the
“war on terror” being used as excuses to trample people’s freedoms.
They have it with Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderon. They have had it with Bush’s
North American Union. They have had it with Joel Osteen and Rick Warren. In
short, they have just had it!

They also know that a vote for
any other Presidential candidate is a vote for more of the same. Democrat or
Republican: it is more of the same. Ron Paul, and Ron Paul alone, will bring a
revolution of freedom and independence to America. Believe me, the Ron Paul
revolution is bigger than Ron Paul. This is the beginning of a movement.

No matter what ultimately
happens to Ron Paul’s candidacy, the fight to return America to its roots of
freedom and independence has started. The fire is lit. There is no putting it
out. There will be other Ron Pauls, other campaigns, other spokesmen, other
fundraising. The people supporting Ron Paul will not be silenced; they will not
be ignored; they will not be intimidated. In truth, Ron Paul’s campaign may
just be the beginning of the end of the elitist, globalist, stranglehold over
America.

As one who is also fed up with
the globalist goons that dominate the two major parties, I join the Ron Paul
revolution and vow to fight for the rest of my life for the freedom and
independence of these United States. This means I will never again support a
business-as-usual, millionaires-club, globalist toady from either party ever
again! I will only support candidates who are fully committed to restoring
constitutional government. If that makes me a kook, so be it.

© 2007 Chuck Baldwin – All
Rights Reserved

 

Hucksters theology degree? Now says ain’t necessarily so


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59222
 
Huckabee’s
theology degree? Now says ain’t necessarily so
Campaign admits candidate doesn’t have claimed religious credential


Posted: December 14, 2007
7:20 p.m. Eastern

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Former Gov. Mike Huckabee
Republican
presidential candidate Mike Huckabee told the Christian Broadcasting Network he
had a theology
degree, he told voters in Iowa he had a theology degree, he repeated the claim
in last month’s CNN YouTube debate … but, his campaign now says, it was not
true.
Huckabee’s claim began unraveling following his offhanded comment about
Mormonism in a New York Times interview last weekend.
Reporter Zev Chafets wrote: “I asked Huckabee, who describes himself as
the only Republican candidate with a degree in theology, if he considered
Mormonism a cult or a religion. ‘I think it’s a religion,’ he said. ‘I really
don’t know much about it.’
“I was about to jot down this piece of boilerplate when Huckabee surprised
me with a question of his own: ‘Don’t Mormons,’ he asked in an innocent voice,
‘believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?'”
In the interview, Huckabee’s account of his education made no mention of his
having earned a theology degree.
Chafets wrote: “If young Mike Huckabee was ever rebellious or difficult,
there’s no record of it. He preached his first sermon as a teenager, married
his high-school sweetheart and went off to Ouachita
Baptist University
in Arkadelphia. There he majored in speech and
communications, worked at a radio station and earned his B.A. in a little more
than two years. He spent a year at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in
Fort Worth, Tex., before dropping out to work for the televangelist James
Robison, who bought him his first decent wardrobe and showed him how to use
television.”
While Huckabee apologized personally to fellow candidate and Mormon Mitt Romney
for his remarks, Chafets’ characterization of the former Arkansas governor and
ordained Baptist pastor as a seminary dropout who did not seem well-versed in
comparative religion, drew the attention of political bloggers.
National
Review’s Jim Geraghty cited Huckabee’s claimed theology degree

when criticizing the candidate for telling CNN’s Wolf Blitzer he had been
trying to avoid talking about the subject with Chafets but the reporter was
“comparably well-schooled on comparative religions.”
“I’m going to call horsepuckey on Huckabee’s claim that a New York Times
reporter knew more about comparative religions than [a] guy with a theology
degree,” Geraghty wrote.
That prompted Joe Carter, Huckabee’s research director, to respond
to Geraghty by e-mail.

Jim,

Governor Huckabee doesn’t have a
theology degree. He only spent a year in seminary.

Also, it’s not surprising that he
doesn’t know much about the specific beliefs of the LDS church. There aren’t a
lot of LDS members in Arkansas; they comprise just .007 percent [sic] of the
population (about 20,000 out of 2,810,872 people). Most Southern evangelicals
don’t have much exposure to that particular religion. Even in seminary you’re
not likely to study the LDS faith unless you take a class on apologetics.

Joe

Carter
made a math error – 0.7 percent of Arkansas’ residents are members of the
Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints.
Today, following a news conference announcing that former Reagan confidante, Ed
Rollins, has become Huckabee’s national campaign manager, the candidate was
asked about a PowerlineBlog
story
that he did not have the theology degree he had claimed.
“I have a Bachelor
of Arts
in religion and a minor in communications in my undergraduate
work,” Huckabee answered. “And then I have 46 hours on a master’s
degree
at Southwestern Theology Seminary. So, my degree as a theological
degree is at the college
level and then 46 hours toward a masters – three years of study
of New Testament Greek, and then the rest of it, all in seminary was
theological studies, but my degree was actually in religion.”
Speaking in Iowa in October, Huckabee
told a sympathetic crowd
, “Anytime you have been a person who was
identified as a pastor and you’ve got a seminary education
and theology degree, people tend to worry about you.”
In November, while appearing on the Christian
Broadcasting Network, Huckabee said
, “People look at my record and say
that I’m as strong on immigration, strong on terror as anybody. In fact I think
I’m stronger than most people because I truly understand the nature of the war
that we are in with Islamofascism. These are people that want to kill us. It’s
a theocratic war. And I don’t know if anybody fully understands that. I’m the
only guy on that stage with a theology degree. I think I understand it really
well. And know the threat of it is absolutely overwhelming to us.”
Last month, during the CNN
YouTube debate
, Huckabee responded to a question to the candidates about
their belief in the Bible: “Sure. I believe the Bible is exactly what it
is. It’s the word of revelation to us from God himself. … And as the only
person here on the stage with a theology degree, there are parts of it I don’t
fully comprehend and understand, because the Bible is a revelation of an
infinite god, and no finite person is ever going to fully understand it. If
they do, their god is too small.”

God Bless Am er ic a!





Huckabee loves gifts & illegals

Huckabee Tries to Gloss Over Ark. Record

HH

Nov
28, 3:12 AM (ET)

By
ANDREW DeMILLO

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) – Mike Huckabee’s presidential rivals are
pointing to chinks in his record as Arkansas’ governor – from ethics complaints
to tax increases to illegal immigration and his support for releasing a rapist
who was later convicted of killing a Missouri woman.

The Republican presidential candidate has plenty to champion from
his 10 1/2 years as governor – including school improvements and health
insurance for the children of the working poor. But his record has rough edges,
and Huckabee has a habit of playing fast and loose with it.

Other campaigns for the GOP nomination, watching Huckabee’s rise
in polls in Iowa, are starting to mine his past for political fodder. Take
ethics, for example.

“People are starting to contact us and they’re saying we want
everything on Mike Huckabee,” says Graham Sloan, director of the state’s
Ethics Commission.

(

What they’ll find is 436 pages of documents chronicling Huckabee’s
various tangles with a commission he’s derided as a political tool of Democrats.
It’s a panel that has held proceedings 20 times on the former governor and
lieutenant governor.

But the Ethics Commission files don’t cover everything, and this
year – anticipating criticism – Huckabee’s campaign set up a “truth
squad” to push his side of various stories. It often offers, at best, an
incomplete account of his record.

On major issues:

_The truth squad says the only finding by the Arkansas Ethics
Commission that Huckabee accepted a gift improperly was tossed out by a state
court. In fact, the panel investigated 16 complaints against Huckabee and found
five violations. Only one, for accepting a $500 canoe from Coca-Cola, was
tossed out.

Two of the complaints against Huckabee pertain to unreported gifts
– the canoe and a $200 stadium blanket received by his wife, Janet. Two stem
from cash the governor or his wife received but did not initially report. The
panel also ruled in 2003 that Huckabee’s campaign violated state law when it
used its funds to pay for an event during the summer of 2002 called Gospel Fest

During his tenure, Huckabee accepted 314 gifts valued overall at
more than $150,000, according to documents filed with the Arkansas secretary of
state’s office. (He accepted 187 gifts in his first three years as governor but
was not required to report their value.)

_Huckabee has consistently understated his role in the parole of
rapist Wayne DuMond, who had been convicted in the 1984 rape of a distant
cousin of former President Clinton.

Two months after taking office, Huckabee stunned the state by
saying he questioned DuMond’s guilt and that it was his intention to free the
rapist, who had been castrated by masked men while awaiting trial. Huckabee
said then he had “serious questions as to the legitimacy of his
guilt” and acknowledged later that he had met with DuMond’s wife about the
case while he was lieutenant governor. Two months after ascending to the
governor’s office, Huckabee met with the woman again.

The ex-governor now blames his predecessor for making DuMond
parole eligible – Jim Guy Tucker commuted a life-plus-20 years sentence to 39
1/2 years – but distances himself from his role in DuMond’s release. Huckabee
met privately with the state parole board, and two members have said he
pressured them for a vote.

“He made it obvious that he thought DuMond had gotten a raw
deal and wanted us to take another look at it,” former board member
Charles Chastain said in 2001. “Some board members who were usually very
tough about letting people out … (later) voted in favor of him, and seemed
eager to.”

On his campaign Web site, Huckabee says the parole board was made
up entirely of Democrats appointed by Clinton and Tucker. It doesn’t mention
that Huckabee reappointed board member Railey Steele days before he voted with
three other members to set DuMond free. DuMond was later convicted of killing a
woman in Missouri and died in 2005.

_Huckabee likes to say he was tough on taxes in Arkansas, noting a
$100 million tax cut in 1997 that until this year was Arkansas’ largest. When
asked about a fuel tax increase he backed in 1999, Huckabee says incorrectly
that he joined 80 percent of Arkansas voters in approving it.

Huckabee in 1999 supported a $1 billion highway bond program,
including costs for interest and lawyers’ fees, but the question on the ballot
was only whether the state could take on the debt, not how Arkansas would pay
for it. Huckabee had signed the fuel tax increase two months earlier.

Shortly after taking office, Huckabee took a four-day trip by bass
boat along the Arkansas River to tout a 1/8th-cent sales tax increase for
outdoor programs. (Two nature centers now carry the names of Huckabee and his
wife.) Taxes went up $40 million in the months before the $100 million tax cut
Huckabee touts.

Other taxes went up as Arkansas changed its property tax system
and made improvements to its school system.

_Huckabee’s recent strong stand on immigration, including an
intolerance toward companies that employ illegal immigrants, runs counter to
the image he crafted in his final years in office. He was battling
conservatives within his own party who were pushing for stricter state-level
immigration measures.

Huckabee opposed a Republican lawmaker’s efforts in 2005 to
require proof of legal status when applying for state services that aren’t
federally mandated and proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Huckabee
derided the bill as un-American and un-Christian and said the bill’s sponsor
drank a different “Jesus juice.”

That same year, Huckabee failed in his effort to make children of
illegal immigrants eligible for state-funded scholarships and in-state tuition
to Arkansas colleges. At the time, Huckabee said he didn’t understand the
opposition to it.

“It hurts me on a personal as well as a policy level to think
that we are still debating issues that I kind of hoped we had put aside in the
1960s, maybe at the latest the ’70s, and yet I understand people have deep
passions about things usually they don’t fully understand,” Huckabee said.




Hucks’ crush of illegal record & use of tax money to fund Mex. Consulate

Dec
14, 7:22 PM EST
Suit: Huckabee used funds to
crush hard drives, win consulate



 


 

LITTLE
ROCK, Ark. (AP) — An amended lawsuit against Republican presidential hopeful
Mike Huckabee claims he illegally used government funds to crush state computer
hard drives and aid the Mexican government to locate a consulate in Arkansas’
capital city.

The suit against the former governor, refiled Friday in
Pulaski County Circuit Court, comes as part of a Freedom of Information Act
complaint by Bella Vista resident Jim Parsons stemming from Huckabee’s last
days in office. However, lawyers for Huckabee have said Parsons’ lawsuit
violates the qualified immunity public servants are granted in the state’s
constitution.

Huckabee used money from the Gov.’s Emergency Fund for a
series of purchases before leaving office, including giving $10,000 to the
city of Little Rock as it tried to bring a consulate there. Huckabee traveled
to Mexico in 2003 and has said hosting a consulate serving the mid-South from
Arkansas would be an economic boon.

The last $13,000 of the fund went toward destroying hard
drives used by the governor’s office at the state Capitol, the Gov.’s Mansion
in Little Rock, Huckabee’s Washington office and the hangar for the state
police airplane on which the governor traveled.

“Mike Huckabee treated the emergency appropriations
not as an appropriation for emergencies … but rather as a ‘slush fund’ of
sorts, which he could use upon his whims for political purposes,” the
suit alleges.

The lawsuit asks Huckabee to repay the spending with his
own money, as well as provide the state backup tapes that held some of the
files destroyed along with the hard drives. It also named current Gov. Mike
Beebe, asking him to turn over records from the backup tapes.

Huckabee, now a GOP front-runner in Iowa and South
Carolina, has defended destroying the hard drives, saying the discs contained
employees’ or constituents’ Social Security numbers and credit card
information.

Parsons, a self-described political gadfly, has filed
other ethics complaints against Arkansas politicians. The state Ethics
Commission previously dismissed two complaints that Parsons filed against
Huckabee over the hard drives’ destruction.

Parsons said the timing of this complaint, about two and
a half weeks before the Iowa caucuses, had nothing to do with politics.

“I’m not so politically one party or the
other,” Parsons said. “I just go after what’s right and what’s
wrong.”

Parsons’ new attorney in the case, Oscar Stilley of Fort
Smith, also is known as a gadfly for his anti-tax lawsuits and initiative
attempts. However, a panel of the state Supreme Court+ Committee on
Professional Conduct decided Friday that Stilley committed “serious
misconduct” in other incidents and issued an order to begin disbarment
proceedings.

Parsons said he didn’t know about Stilley’s hearing.

“I don’t know how that will come out or anything
about his case,” Parsons said.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn
more about our Privacy Policy.

The Great Huck(ster)bee





The Great Huck(ster)bee

By Don A. Bright



Author’s note:
Most, if not all of the information
for this and other national exposure of Huckabee’s wrongdoings would not have
gotten to the public’s notice without the untiring efforts of anti-illegal
immigration activist and Mike Huckabee watchdog, Joe McCutchen and his wife,
Barbara, of Fort Smith, AR. For more on the exploits of Huckabee visit Joe’s
website:
ArkansasFreedom

I live in Arkansas. I have lived through two terms of
“governance” under Mike Huckabee. That alone qualifies me for membership in the
vastly expanding BYVMHCO (before you vote for Mike Huckabee, check this out)
early warning academy. This encouraging and growing movement is represented by
a lot of ex-Huckabee fans – inside and outside his circles – who were, like me,
sorely disappointed and angry at his metamorphic personality.

At this point I should admit the error of my ways concerning Mr. Huckabee. I
voted for the man the first time around. Yep, I fell for his “I’m a
Conservative, Christian, honorable and trustworthy man of humble upbringing…”
syrup drippings. It grieves me greatly to look back on this weakness.

Now, having gotten all that off my chest, I will proceed here to, hopefully,
enlighten the BYVMHCO academy with a couple of heretofore unknown sins of the
Baptist preacher.

My first dealing with Huckabee came shortly after his first term began. At that
time I was actively working for private property issues. I was a co-founder of
a property rights organization called Take Back Arkansas. We had discovered
that a great land theft was afoot. The United Nations and local
“environmentalists” were wasting no efforts in an attempt to establish the Ozark Man and the Biosphere
Reserve in our own backyard. We were eventually successful despite Governor
Huckabee resistance.

When we raised enough awareness of this tomfoolery the good
governor began getting a lot of pressure to own up to his involvement. (We knew
he was working with the Fish and Game Commissioner in helping the UN get
control of a massive amount of private and public property. We actually had a
copy of a letter Huckabee had sent to the commissioner instructing him to
assist the UN and environmental groups to actually turn over a huge section of
the land and inhabitants of his own state to international control. But I get
ahead of myself.)

Upon finding out about the UN scheme we were naïve enough to think that a
letter to the office of the huckster would call his attention to what was
happening and he would, of course, put an immediate stop to the land grab. His
response? Silence. We persisted, however, and managed – as I state above – to
bring a lot of pressure on the governor’s office and the members of the state
legislature. (At the time I hosted a local radio program which was, needless to
say, a great help. (More on that later.)

Having no choice but break his cover-up-by-silence efforts, Huckabee came out
and vociferously denied that the plan existed and that those who were saying it
did exist were a bunch of “black helicopter”, anti-UN types who were trying to
scare the good citizens of Arkansas. I am sure I remember him saying something
to the fact that if any such effort as described by we scaremongers was ongoing
he would have stopped it long ago.

So there was the governor of the State of Arkansas, effortlessly lying to his
own citizens about a life-shattering event that would change their lives in a
devastating manner. And in so doing he gleefully tried to destroy the
reputations of other Arkansans. Typical acts of a true Christian? I’ll leave
that for the reader to decide.

It was at this time that we released the letter –signed by Huckabee – wherein
he had instructed the Arkansas Fish and Game Commissioner to proceed with
assisting in the implementation of the “plan that didn’t exist”. Well, needless
to say, the barnyard filler hit the fan. Huckabee, acting like a kid with his
hand in the cookie jar, began a barrage of denials, blame shifting and
scapegoating that would have done Bill Clinton proud. We had managed to drag
him kicking and screaming into the realm of truth. A realm in which, I’m sure,
he did not recognize as familiar surroundings. Much to his discomfort he had to
confront his deceit and openly put a stop to Arkansas’ cooperation in the UN
invasion and the Biosphere plans were abandoned. Read Defeating
the Biosphere by Henry Lamb

My second up front and personal experience with Huckabee happened during an
interview with him on live radio. I couldn’t entice the man with the mutating
mouth to be a guest on my show but a friend of mine who had a show following
mine managed to land him and invited me to take part.

Many questions were asked covering a multitude of subjects. As is his wont,
Huckabee danced around the difficult ones in a manner that would make Bo
Jangles proud. I wanted desperately to get him on the subject of property rights
and finally my chance came. I asked him for his opinion on regulatory takings
and the property loss of individuals without just recompense by the government
as called for in the Constitution.

I could see the anger in his face when I confronted him this subject. His
answer? He stated that the taking of property by the government without paying
for it had to be considered on a “case by case” basis. I thought I had him
there and went in for the kill. Or at least I tried to. I began a question
about how he could justify his position that the Fifth Amendment could be
ignored on a “case by case” rationale. Half way through the question his face
became livid and he interrupted me and changed the subject.

There you have it. The governor of an American state was on record as a liberal
“the Constitution is a living document” adherent. So much for Huckabee’s
adherence to the law of the land. He actually thinks the Constitution of the
United States is his to play with to further his insatiable thirst for power over
the people. Not a standard for conservatism, that.

Now add the following to his resume: (It may serve the reader well to remember
that Huckabee was propped up by support and financial help by several corporate
tycoons who made a great deal of profit off the backs of exploited captive
labor.)

*Huckabee tried to give
scholarships for criminal aliens to attend Arkansas state colleges

*Huckabee increased the
average Arkansan’s tax burden
by 47 percent, boosting the levies on gasoline and cigarettes
.

*Quin Hillyer, a former
Arkansas journalist writing in the conservative American Spectator was quoted
by Greg Peirce in the Washington Times as saying, “[Huckabee] used public
money for family restaurant meals, boat expenses, and other personal uses. He
tried to claim as his own some $70,000 of furniture donated to the governor’s
mansion. He repeatedly, and obstinately, against the pleadings even from
conservative columnists and editorials, refused to divulge the names of donors
to a ‘charitable’ organization he set up while lieutenant governor–an outfit
whose main charitable purpose seemed to be to pay Huckabee to make speeches.
Then, as a kicker, he misreported the income itself from the suspicious
‘charity.'”

*Roy Beck, president of
NumbersUSA said the following about Huckabee’s record on illegal immigration: “He
was an absolute disaster on immigration as governor; Every time there was any
enforcement in his state, he took the side of the illegal aliens.”

*Article 1 Section 10 of the
US Constitution reads as follows: “No State shall enter into any Treaty,
Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money;
emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in
Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law
impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility”.
And
yet, Jerome Corsi, author of the best seller “The Late Great
USA.”
w
riting for Worldnetdaily , exposed the fact that Mike
Huckabee “worked with some of the state’s most prominent and politically
powerful businesses to establish the [Mexican] consulate as a magnet for
drawing illegal immigrants to the state to accept low-paying jobs.” Corsi
also writes that “Robert Trevino, commissioner of Arkansas Rehabilitation
Services, told Worldnetdaily
he and Huckabee helped arrange state and private financial support to induce
Mexico to establish the consulate as a business development ‘quid pro quo.’
“Trevino signed on July 7, 2006, a ‘Facilities Use Agreement’ with Mexican
consular officials to rent state government office space for $1 a year on the
second floor of the Arkansas Rehabilitation Services building at 26 Corporate
Hills in Little Rock.”

* Mike Huckabee ordered the
destruction of a number of computer hard drives before leaving office. Hard
drives in 83 computers and four servers were destroyed,

Mike Huckabee has proven over and over again that the rule of law & the
Constitution are meaningless, and that he will say & do anything to promote
himself….the republic be damned.

So BYVMHCO. You
have been warned.

 
TO
DAY’S ROMP

With syrupy words and witty quips
preacher Mike covers his flips.
Believe him if you will,
but I won’t until,
I see some sutures crossing his lips.





The Demise of the Minutemen & another Huc kabee Huckster

 

 

Jim Gilchrist                                                                                                                        December
11, 2007

As the founder of the Minuteman Project and as I have said
on many occasions, it was the greatest opportunity to take back our weak and
sick Constitutional Republic.

Tonight on the Wolf Blitzer program, you not only lost the
last vestiges of credibility, and more importantly, you betrayed our collective
cause.

You obviously have no idea what a treasonous man Mike
Huckabee is, or you have been bought by evangelicals and/or the neocons.  As you may recall, I offered a number of
tried and true experiences to you and Simcox on the border in “05 and
unfortunately neither of you listened and have irreversibly betrayed the
movement.

I believe you to be a man of courage, but you just seem to
have a knack for following the wrong trails. 
Having said this, you could use your media sources to exclaim you have
made a terrible mistake in endorsing Huckabee.

Go to our website arkansasfreedom.net
for facts and truth regarding the 10 year terroristic reign of Huckabee.

Barbara and I have spent considerable amounts of time in
smoking out this rat, beginning with his clandestine meeting in Mexico with
then President Vicente Fox….bringing a Mexican Consulate to Little Rock,
Arkansas without the state legislature or people’s knowledge to serve as a
clearing house for illegals into the Arkansas workforce, i.e. Tyson’s, Georges,
Carlisle, OK Foods, etc.  The consulate
was subsidized by at least $60,000 taxpayer dollars that we can prove.

Jim, not only was this a treacherous attack against
middleclass taxpayers, but it was in violation of Article 1, Section 10 of the
U.S. Constitution.  The FOI’s we filed,
and the private investigator we hired will document all of the above and much
more, and will allow you to see the criminal activities Huckabee has been and
is involved in.

Semper Fi  Jim…Do the
right thing and denounce this snake!

Kindest regards,

Joe McCutchen

Fort Smith, Arkansas

 

Huckabee outrageous lies re illegal immigration


Huckabee outrageous lies…see explanations in red.

ttp://www2.arkansasonline.com/news/2007/dec/07/huckabee-plan-supports-fines-hiring-illeg-20071207/     

Huckabee plan supports fines for hiring illegals

By Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

LITTLE ROCK — Mike Huckabee’s
immigration plan would make it easier for highly educated and highly skilled
foreigners to get visas and harder for illegal aliens to get jobs.

The Republican presidential
candidate’s “Secure America Plan,” announced Thursday, is modeled after a
proposal by Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration
Studies, a Washington group that advocates tougher immigration laws.

Huckabee’s Web site,
mikehuckabee.com, calls it “a broad-based strategy that commits the resources
of the federal government to the enforcement of our immigration laws and
results in the attrition of the illegal immigrant population.”

His plan calls for “a universal, mandatory citizenship verification
system as part of the normal hiring process.” It would impose “steep fines and
penalties” on those who hire illegal aliens. (See
existing
Federal Law

8
USC Sec 1325 – Illegal Entry

Any alien who enters U.S. other than at A port of entry
by false or misleading representation shall be subject to civil and criminal
penalties can be fined and imprisoned)

It would not recognize the matricula
consular identification card issued by the Mexican government through its
consulate offices.

 (See arkansasfreedom.net for documents proving
Huckabee defied the Constitution by going to Mexico to cut a deal with Vicente
Fox to bring a Mexican Consulate to Little Rock, Arkansas, subsidized by
American citizen taxpayers, in order to give Matricula Consular cards to
illegals and attract more cheap slave labor for the poultry and other
industries, as well as government programs such as Arkids 1st ,
Prenatal care, and tried to give illegals in-state tuition &
scholarships.  All of which is subsidized
by taxpayers, including education and scores of benefits. This is his biggest
lie yet.)

Other elements of the plan:

Complete a fence and
surveillance-camera system along the Mexican border by July 2010.

Increase the number of border-patrol
units.

Train local police in immigration
laws.

(See Federal Law 8USC  Section 1324c Law
officers have authority to make arrests…

All officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws
shall have authority to make arrests for
violation of any provision of this section
(affirmed US vs. Perez-Gonzalez 2002 Fed App 0360, 6th Circ.) Section 1324a
Hiring – Harboring – Transporting any illegal alien.

Section 1644

No local ordinance, rule, or measure shall stop law enforcement
officers from enforcement of this
section  
(affirmed Southern District Court of NY, US vs. Rudy Giuliani, 1996.)

 

Give illegal aliens 120 days to
register with the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services and leave the
country. Those who do not do so would be barred from re-entering the country
for 10 years.

This article was published Friday,
December 7, 2007
.

Front Section, Pages 11 on
12/07/2007

 

Huckabee on Scholarships for Illegals: Lies, Deceit & misrepresentation



Download critical document for viewing 

In the You Tube Debate held last week, Mike Huckabee was asked

the following question about sponsoring a bill proposing tuition cuts

to illegal aliens graduating from Arkansas high schools:

“Governor Huckabee, while governor of Arkansas, you gave illegal

aliens a discount for college in Arkansas by allow them to pay lower

in-state tuition rates. However, we have thousands of military

members currently serving our country in Iraq with children at

home. If these children chose to move to Arkansas to attend college,

they would have to pay three times the tuition rate that illegal aliens

pay. Would you support a federal law which would require any

state that gives these tuition rates to illegal aliens to give the same

rates to the children of our military members?”

Huckabee answered:

“Thank you very much. Ashley, first of all, let me just express that

you’re a little misinformed. We never passed a bill that gave special

privileges to the children of illegals to go to college.

Now, let me tell you what I did do. I supported the bill that would’ve

allowed those children who had been in our schools their entire

school life the opportunity to have the same scholarship that their

peers had, who had also gone to high school with them and sat in

the same classrooms.

They couldn’t just move in in their senior year and go to college. It

wasn’t about out of state tuition. It was an academic, meritorious

scholarship called the Academic Challenge Scholarship.

Now, let me tell you a couple of provisions of it. And, by the way, it

didn’t pass. It passed the House but got in the Senate and got caught

up in the same kind of controversy that this country is caught up in.

And here’s what happened. This bill would’ve said that if you came

here, not because you made the choice but because your parents did,

that we’re not going to punish a child because the parent committed

a crime.

That’s not what we typically do in this country.

It said that if you’d sat in our schools from the time you’re five or

six-years old and you had become an A-plus student, you’d

completed the core curriculum, you were an exceptional student,

and you also had to be drug and alcohol-free — and the other

provision, you had to be applying for citizenship.

It accomplished two things that we knew we wanted to do, and that

is, number one, bring people from illegal status to legal status.

And the second thing, we wanted people to be taxpayers, not taxtakers.

And that’s what that provision did.

And finally, would we give that provision to the children of

veterans, personally? What we’ve done with not just the children of

veterans, but most importantly, veterans is disgraceful in this

country.

And that’s why I proposed a veterans bill of rights that, if anything,

would give our veterans the most exceptional privileges of all,

because they are the ones who have earned all of our freedom —

every single one of them.”

Discussion of Huckabee’s Lies, Deceit and Misrepresentation

Instead of being candid, Huckabee tried to confuse the issue by

interjecting information about the Arkansas Academic Challenge

Program, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 6-82-1001, et seq. (a copy of

which is enclosed). The Academic Challenge Program is based on

being an Arkansas resident and makes no mention of the children of

illegal aliens. In addition, the truth is that Huckabee played no part

in the Academic Challenge Program and that it was enacted with the

passing of Arkansas Act 352 of 1991, becoming law more than four

years before Huckabee began his first time as Arkansas Governor in

1996.

Mr. Huckabee sought to avoid questions about the bill that he was

really asked about, the Access to Postsecondary Education Act of

2005, HB1525. A full copy of that bill is attached. Huckabee can

be viewed promoting HB1525 during his State of the State Address

at http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=5193.

A mere perusal of HB1525 reveals that Huckabee was deceptive in

giving his response. For example, Huckabee indicated that the bill

required children to attend schools in Arkansas their “entire school

life,” or “from the time you’re five or six-years old.” However,

Section 1(b) of HB1525 only required three years of attendance in

an Arkansas school.

Huckabee claimed that students had to be an “a A-plus student” and

that they must have “completed the core curriculum,” and “be drug

and alcohol free.” The truth is that not even a single one of these

requirements is contained in HB1525. HB1525 was not a merit

based bill.

Huckabee also was untruthful when he said that the bill would

“bring people from illegal status to legal status.” The bill did not

require legal status. Rather, it only required filing an affidavit

saying that you intend to legalize your immigration status. Contrary

to what Huckabee said, HB1525 did not even require proof of even

attempting to obtain legal status. Huckabee also tried to deflect

attention away from his actions by saying that the bill would make

people taxpayers. Again, the bill contained no such requirement

because proof of legal status was not part of HB1525.

Summary of Huckabee’s Lies, Deceit and Misrepresentation

In sum, a total of five statements made by Huckabee in his response

to one single question were lies.

The lies were (as emphasized below):

(1) “I supported the bill that would’ve allowed those children who

had been in our schools their entire school life the opportunity t
o

have the same scholarship that their peers had, who had also gone to

high school with them and sat in the same classrooms.”

(2) “It was an academic, meritorious scholarship called the

Academic Challenge Scholarship.”

(3) “It said that if you’d sat in our schools from the time you’re

five or six-years old and you had become an A-plus student, you’d

completed the core curriculum, you were an exceptional student,

and you also had to be drug and alcohol-free — and the other

provision, you had to be applying for citizenship.”

(4) “It accomplished two things that we knew we wanted to do, and

that is, number one, bring people from illegal status to legal

status.”

(5) “And the second thing, we wanted people to be taxpayers, not

tax-takers. And that’s what that provision did.”

It’s one thing to flip flop on a position that is the most important

issue in the campaign.

It’s a vastly different thing to tell millions of Americans numerous

lies about your record on the issue.

In the You Tube Debate held last week, Mike Huckabee was

asked the following question about sponsoring a bill proposing

tuition cuts to illegal aliens graduating from Arkansas high

schools:

Governor Huckabee, while governor of Arkansas, you gave illegal

aliens a discount for college in Arkansas by allow them to pay lower

in-state tuition rates. However, we have thousands of military

members currently serving our country in Iraq with children at

home. If these children chose to move to Arkansas to attend college,

they would have to pay three times the tuition rate that illegal aliens

pay. Would you support a federal law which would require any

state that gives these tuition rates to illegal aliens to give the same

rates to the children of our military members?”

Huckabee answered:

“Thank you very much. Ashley, first of all, let me just express that

you’re a little misinformed. We never passed a bill that gave special

privileges to the children of illegals to go to college.

Now, let me tell you what I did do. I supported the bill that would’ve

allowed those children who had been in our schools their entire

school life the opportunity to have the same scholarship that their

peers had, who had also gone to high school with them and sat in

the same classrooms.

They couldn’t just move in in their senior year and go to college. It

wasn’t about out of state tuition. It was an academic, meritorious

scholarship called the Academic Challenge Scholarship.

Now, let me tell you a couple of provisions of it. And, by the way, it

didn’t pass. It passed the House but got in the Senate and got caught

up in the same kind of controversy that this country is caught up in.

And here’s what happened. This bill would’ve said that if you came

here, not because you made the choice but because your parents did,

that we’re not going to punish a child because the parent committed

a crime.

That’s not what we typically do in this country.

It said that if you’d sat in our schools from the time you’re five or

six-years old and you had become an A-plus student, you’d

completed the core curriculum, you were an exceptional student,

and you also had to be drug and alcohol-free — and the other

provision, you had to be applying for citizenship.

It accomplished two things that we knew we wanted to do, and that

is, number one, bring people from illegal status to legal status.

And the second thing, we wanted people to be taxpayers, not taxtakers.

And that’s what that provision did.

And finally, would we give that provision to the children of

veterans, personally? What we’ve done with not just the children of

veterans, but most importantly, veterans is disgraceful in this

country.

And that’s why I proposed a veterans bill of rights that, if anything,

would give our veterans the most exceptional privileges of all,

because they are the ones who have earned all of our freedom —

every single one of them.”

Instead of being candid, Huckabee tried to confuse the issue by

interjecting information about the Arkansas Academic Challenge

Program, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 6-82-1001, et seq. (a copy of

which is enclosed). Truth is that Huckabee played no part in the

Academic Challenge Program and that it was enacted by Arkansas

Act 352 of 1991, becoming law more than four years before

Huckabee began his first time as Arkansas Governor in 1996.

Mr. Huckabee sought to avoid questions about the bill that he was

really asked about, HB1525. A full copy of that bill is attached.

Huckabee can be viewed promoting HB1525 during his State of the

State Address at http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=5193.

A mere perusal of HB1525 reveals that Huckabee was deceptive in

giving his response. For example, Huckabee indicated that the bill

required children to attend schools in Arkansas their “entire school

life,” or “from the time you’re five or six-years old.” However,

Section 1(b) of HB1525 only required three years of attendance in

an Arkansas school.

Huckabee claimed that students had to be an “a A-plus student” and

that they must have “completed the core curriculum,” and “be drug

and alcohol free.” The truth is that not even a single one of these

requirements is contained in HB1525. HB1525 was not a merit

based bill.

Huckabee also was untruthful when he said that the bill would

“bring people from illegal status to legal status.” The bill did not

require legal status. Rather, it only required filing an affidavit

saying that you intend to legalize your immigration status. Contrary

to what Huckabee said, HB
1525 did not even require proof of even

attempting to obtain legal status. Huckabee also tried to deflect

attention away from his actions by saying that the bill would make

people taxpayers. Again, the bill contained no such requirement

because proof of legal status was not part of HB1525.

In sum, a total of five statements made by Huckabee in his response

to one single question were lies.

The lies were (as emphasized below):

(1) “I supported the bill that would’ve allowed those children who

had been in our schools their entire school life the opportunity to

have the same scholarship that their peers had, who had also gone to

high school with them and sat in the same classrooms.”

(2) “It was an academic, meritorious scholarship called the

Academic Challenge Scholarship.”

(3) “It said that if you’d sat in our schools from the time you’re

five or six-years old and you had become an A-plus student, you’d

completed the core curriculum, you were an exceptional student,

and you also had to be drug and alcohol-free — and the other

provision, you had to be applying for citizenship.”

(4) “It accomplished two things that we knew we wanted to do, and

that is, number one, bring people from illegal status to legal

status.”

(5) “And the second thing, we wanted people to be taxpayers, not

tax-takers. And that’s what that provision did.”

It’s one thing to flip flop on a position that is the most important

issue in the campaign.

It’s a vastly different thing to tell millions of Americans numerous

lies about your record on the issue.

6-82-1001. Legislative findings and declarations of public necessity.

The General Assembly hereby recognizes that taking the proper

course work in high school is essential for success in college.

Arkansas high school students who complete the recommended

precollegiate or technical preparation core curriculum score

significantly higher on standardized preadmissions tests and are

more likely to be successful in college. Because the State of

Arkansas also benefits from the academic success of well-prepared

college students, there is hereby established the Arkansas Academic

Challenge Scholarship Program, a college scholarship plan to

promote academic achievement and encourage academically

prepared Arkansas high school graduates to enroll in the state’s

colleges and universities and to encourage students to enter the field

of teaching for the purpose of teaching in subject matter areas of

critical teacher shortage or in geographical areas of critical teacher

shortage in the state.

History. Acts 1991, No. 352, § 1; 1991, No. 362, § 1; 1993, No.

1170, § 1; 1997, No. 977, § 4; 1999, No. 858, § 11; 2003, No. 1798,

§ 1. 6-82-1005. Eligibility.

(a) Eligibility for the Arkansas Academic Challenge Scholarship

Program shall be based on the criteria set forth in this section as

well as program rules and regulations adopted pursuant to this

subchapter by the Department of Higher Education.

(b) An applicant shall be eligible for an award from this program

if the applicant meets all of these criteria:

(1) The applicant graduated from an Arkansas high school on or

after March 5, 1991;

(2) The applicant has been a resident of the State of Arkansas for

at least twelve (12) months prior to graduation from an Arkansas

high school, and the applicant’s parent or parents or guardian or

guardians have maintained Arkansas residency for the same period

of time;

(3) The applicant is a citizen of the United States or is a permanent

resident alien;

(4) The applicant is accepted for admission at an approved

institution of higher education as a full-time first-time freshman as

defined by the department and enrolls in an approved institution

within twelve (12) months of the applicant’s high school graduation;

(5)(A)(i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(5)( of this section,

the applicant has successfully completed the core curriculum

established by the State Board of Education and the Arkansas

Higher Education Coordinating Board pursuant to § 6-61-217.

(ii) An applicant who graduates from an Arkansas high school

after December 31, 2001, but before December 1, 2009, and who

meets the provisions of subdivisions (b)(1)-(4) of this section but

who has not completed the core curriculum defined in this

subdivision (b)(5)(A) by the end of the senior year of high school

due to the unavailability of the courses in the applicant’s high school

shall have a grace period of twelve (12) months from the date of

high school graduation in which to make up any course deficiencies

required for program eligibility.

An applicant who graduates from an Arkansas high school after

December 31, 2009, shall have:

(i) Successfully completed the Smart Core Curriculum as

established by the Department of Education; and

(ii)(a) Demonstrated proficiency in the application of knowledge

and skills in reading and writing literacy and mathematics by

passing the end-of-course examinations as may be developed by the

Department of Education and as may be designated by the

Department of Higher Education for this purpose.

(b) “End-of-course” examinations means those examinations

defined in § 6-15-419;

(6)(A) The applicant who graduates from an Arkansas high school

after December 31, 2001, must have achieved the following:

(i) A grade point average of 3.0 on a 4.0 scale in the set of core

curriculum courses if enrolling at an approved four-year institution;

or

(ii) A grade point average of 2.75 on a 4.0 scale in the set of core

curriculum courses if enrolling at an approved two-year institution;

and

(iii)(a) These revised grade point average requirements may be

reduced to no lower than a 2.5 on a 4.0 scale by a rules change by

the Department of Higher Education if it is determined by the

department, based on the most recent evaluation of the program’s

operation, that the change to a 3.0 or 2.75 grade point average on a

4.0 scale would unduly reduce the number of low-income or

disadvantaged students who would therwise be eligible for the

program.

(b) At the Department of Higher Education’s discretion, the

Department of Higher Education may make such a reduction for

admissions to institutions with a high percentage of students

receiving full Pell Grants upon petition to the Department of Higher

Education by the institution.

(The applicant scored nineteen (19) or above on the American

College Test composite or the equivalent as defined by the

Department of Higher Education.

(C)(i) The Department of Higher Education is authorized to

develop selection criteria through program rules and regulations that

combine an applicant’s American College Test or equivalent score

and grade point average in the core curriculum into a selection

index.

(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions (b)(6)(A) and

(b)(6)( of this section, this selection index shall be employed as an

alternative selection process for applicants who achieve a grade

point average above 2.75 if attending an approved two-year

institution or 3.0 if attending a four-year institution on a 4.0 scale in

the set of core curriculum courses defined in subdivision (b)(5)(A)

of this section or for applicants who have an American College Test

composite or equivalent score greater than nineteen (19).

(D)(i) The applicant demonstrates financial need as defined by the

department.

(i) In calculating financial need for applicants who graduate from

an Arkansas high school after December 31, 1998, but before

January 1, 2001, the following criteria shall be used:

(a) An applicant whose family includes one (1) unemancipated

child shall have average family adjusted gross income over the

previous two (2) years not exceeding seventy thousand dollars

($70,000) per year at the time of application to the program;

(b) An applicant whose family includes two (2) unemancipated

children shall have average family adjusted gross income over the

previous two (2) years not exceeding seventy-five thousand dollars

($75,000) per year at the time of application to the program;

(c) An applicant whose family includes three (3) or more

unemancipated children shall have average family adjusted gross

income over the previous two (2) years not exceeding eighty

thousand dollars ($80,000) per year at the time of application to the

program, plus for families with more than three (3) unemancipated

children, an additional five thousand

dollars ($5,000) per year for each additional child;

(d) Any applicant whose family includes more than one (1)

unemancipated child enrolled full time at an approved institution of

higher education shall be entitled to an additional ten thousand

dollars ($10,000) of adjusted gross income for each additional child

when the department calculates financial need; and

(e) If the applicant is an adopted child who was at least twelve

(12) years of age at the time of adoption and if the applicant’s family

includes unemancipated adopted children who were at least twelve

(12) years of age at the time of adoption, the adoptive family shall

be entitled to an additional ten thousand dollars ($10,000) of

adjusted gross income per adopted unemancipated child.

(iii) In calculating financial need for applicants who graduated

from an Arkansas high school after December 31, 2000, but before

December 31, 2004, the following criteria shall be used:

(a) An applicant whose family includes one (1) unemancipated

child shall have average family adjusted gross income over the

previous two (2) years not exceeding fifty thousand dollars

($50,000) per year at the time of application to the program;

(b) An applicant whose family includes two (2) unemancipated

children shall have average family adjusted gross income over the

previous two (2) years not exceeding fifty-five thousand dollars

($55,000) per year at the time of application to the program;

(c) An applicant whose family includes three (3) or more

unemancipated children shall have average family adjusted gross

income over the previous two (2) years not exceeding sixty

thousand dollars ($60,000) per year at the time of application to the

program, plus for families with more than three (3) unemancipated

children an additional five thousand

dollars ($5,000) per year for each additional child; and

(d) Any applicant whose family includes more than one (1)

unemancipated child enrolled full time at an approved institution of

higher education shall be entitled to an additional ten thousand

dollars ($10,000) of adjusted gross income for each additional

unemancipated child enrolled full time at an approved institution of

higher education when the Department of Higher Education

calculates financial need.

(iv) In calculating financial need for applicants who graduate from

an Arkansas high school after December 31, 2006, a Free

Application for Federal Student Aid or a subsequent application

required by the United States Department of Education for federal

financial aid shall be filed by the applicant or other proof of family

income as defined by the Department of Higher Education. The

following criteria shall be used:

(a) An applicant whose family includes one (1) unemancipated

child shall have an average family adjusted gross income over the

previous two (2) years not exceeding sixty-five thousand dollars

($65,000) per year at the time of application to the program;

(b) An applicant whose family includes two (2) unemancipated

children shall have an average family adjusted gross income over

the previous two (2) years not exceeding seventy thousand dollars

($70,000) per year at the time of application to the program;

(c) An applicant whose family includes three (3) or more

unemancipated children shall have an average family adjusted gross

income over the previous two (2) years not exceeding seventy-five

thousand dollars ($75,000) per year at the time of application to the

program, plus for families with more than three (3) unemancipated

children, an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000) per
year for

each additional child; and

(d) Any applicant whose family includes more than one (1)

unemancipated child enrolled full time at an approved institution of

higher education shall be entitled to an additional ten thousand

dollars ($10,000) of adjusted gross income for each additional

unemancipated child enrolled full time at an approved institution of

higher education when the Department of Higher Education

calculates financial need.

(c)(1) The Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board shall

have the authority to increase these financial need family income

limitations if sufficient additional funds become available.

(2) Financial need criteria necessary for the selection of recipients,

including those defined as emancipated or independent by federal

student aid regulations, shall be established through rules and

regulations issued by the department.

(d) Recipients of Arkansas Governor’s Distinguished Scholarships

are prohibited from receiving Arkansas Academic Challenge

Scholarships.

(e) As an additional component to the Arkansas Academic

Challenge Scholarship:

(1) Each applicant for the scholarship shall agree that for each

year the scholarship is awarded he or she may volunteer to serve as

a literacy tutor for a minimum of twenty (20) clock hours each

semester in a public school or a faith-based educational institution

serving students in prekindergarten through grade six (PreK-6);

(2) A recipient who agrees to volunteer as a literacy tutor:

(A) Shall complete the prerequisite training in literacy and college

readiness skills provided under § 6-82-1006(d) before he or she

begins tutoring; and

( May receive college credit for the tutoring as determined by the

institution of higher education awarding the scholarship; and

(3) An enrolled college student who participates in the tutorial

program and fails to meet the Arkansas Academic Challenge

Scholarship academic eligibility requirement for the fall or spring

semester shall be given the probationary opportunity during the

subsequent spring or summer term to continue his or her education

and improve academic performance prior to losing scholarship

funding in the subsequent semester.

History. Acts 1991, No. 352, § 4; 1991, No. 362, § 4; 1991, No.

733, §§ 1, 2; 1992 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 47, §§ 2, 3; 1993, No. 1170, §

3; 1993, No. 1244, §§ 1, 2; 1995, No. 1296, § 38; 1997, No. 977, §

5; 1999, No. 858, §§ 4-9; 2001, No. 1836, § 3; 2005, No. 2011, §§

2, 3; 2005, No. 2197, § 3; 2005, No. 2214, §§ 2, 3; 2007, No. 341, §

2; No. 840, § 1.