{"id":820,"date":"2007-03-07T22:53:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-07T22:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arkansasfreedom.net\/?p=820"},"modified":"2007-03-07T22:53:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-07T22:53:00","slug":"a-dishonest-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/?p=820","title":{"rendered":"A Dishonest Man"},"content":{"rendered":"

A DISHONEST MAN
\n<\/span><\/i><\/b>By Don A. Bright<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n

U.S. District Judge Jimm Larry Hendren is a dishonest man. 
\nHendren practices dishonesty in the most devious and destructive form there
\nis.  Hendren lies for the State.  Hendren lies in order to keep the
\nbenefits of power:  Power for himself and power for others of his ilk who
\nuse their power to strip others of their freedom.  It takes a powerfully
\nwarped ego to make a person so arrogant as to lead that person into the
\ncorruptness that is manifested in Hendren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s judicial vacuousness.  <\/p>\n

Jimm Hendren is the antithesis of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153honorable\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, a term that is attached to his
\nblack robe and, in this case, not the man.  I have been in many courtrooms
\nin my life and have always performed as instructed by the phrase \u00e2\u20ac\u0153all
\nrise!\u00e2\u20ac\u009d  On January 12, 2007 I stayed in my seat when that call came to
\nannounce the judge\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s leaving the courtroom.  I did that because after
\nbeing exposed to the gangrenous demagoguery and arrogance that flowed so
\neloquently from the lips of this man I felt no need to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153rise!\u00e2\u20ac\u009d.  It felt
\ngood. <\/p>\n

What I had just witnessed was the behavior of the generic target of our
\nforefathers when they defined the danger of the state without boundaries. 
\nOur Constitution was written for the sole purpose of stopping men like
\nHendren.  Most troubling is the fact that Hendren is well aware of
\nthat.  His fear of being exposed as the power groping statist he is was, I
\nam sure, the very reason he took the actions and made the declarations he did
\nduring the trial I witnessed. <\/p>\n

The trial I am writing of was The United States vs. Hollis Wayne Fincher. 
\nMr. Fincher was subjected to a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153no knock\u00e2\u20ac\u009d assault from the minions of the
\nfederal, state, county and municipal law enforcement agencies and arrested for
\nhaving \u00e2\u20ac\u0153illegal\u00e2\u20ac\u009d guns in his possession.  The raids (there were warrants
\nfor 13 other friends of Wayne) themselves were of little note here. 
\nAlthough more \u00e2\u20ac\u0153illegal\u00e2\u20ac\u009d guns were confiscated from others who were raided, only
\nWayne was arrested.  Why?  I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll let the officer that was part of one
\nof the raids where the person involved was not placed under arrest speak on
\nthat.  That officer, when asked by the victim of the raid why he (the
\nvictim) was not being arrested, made the following statement, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re after
\nWayne Fincher\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. <\/p>\n

This startling revelation made the reasons behind the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153get Wayne Fincher\u00e2\u20ac\u009d raids
\nvery clear to all of us who follow local politics in the Washington County
\narea.  Wayne was a very brilliant and formidable opponent of those in
\npower in the area.  His imposition of constitutional guidelines and laws
\ninto the give and take of Washington County politics frightened his
\nopponents.  It made sense that they would stop at nothing to get rid of
\nthis man.  They did.  I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll let the reader fill in the blanks here\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 I
\nwant to get back to that Hendren fellow. <\/p>\n

It is no secret that our federal government is exercising more and more power
\nover the individual is the last half of this century, give or take.  And
\none does not need to have an IQ in 3 digits to know that the Constitution is an
\noffense to those whose thinking is statist. <\/p>\n

They hate it.  Thus it has become necessary for these elitists to make the
\nConstitution irrelevant. How best to do that?  Simple.  Instruct the
\njudiciary to exercise control of it.<\/p>\n

This they have done.  The simple exerting of two fictions is all that is
\nnecessary for this task.  (1.) Instruct the populace that only they (the
\njudiciary) can interpret the meaning of the Constitution, and (2.) buttress
\nthat fiction by excising the Constitution from the courtroom. <\/p>\n

That is how we end up with lapdogs the likes of Hendren.  He will resort
\nto any kind frightening rhetoric and gavel thumping arrogation to protect his
\nnaked regalia and that of his fellow travelers.  To exercise control over
\nthe commons is commonplace in these exalted waters. <\/p>\n

Let\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s take a look at how Hendren did just that in ruling over the Fincher
\ntrial.  With inordinate comfort and a hubristic smile \u00e2\u20ac\u0153judge\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Hendren did
\nthe following: <\/p>\n

* Refused to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153allow\u00e2\u20ac\u009d the use of Fincher\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s ultimate and necessary defense, i.e.
\nthe Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of
\nArkansas. <\/p>\n

* Refused to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153allow\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Fincher his inalienable and constitutional right (6th<\/sup>
\nAmendment) to be tried by a jury. Hendren would only \u00e2\u20ac\u0153allow\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Fincher to give
\ntestimony in front of Hendren, himself, and then denied Fincher the right to be
\nheard by a jury of his peers. <\/p>\n

* Intimidated the jury by telling the jury it could not think outside the box
\nthe judge defined. <\/p>\n

To back up these charges, I offer the following quotes from Hendren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s
\ninstructions to the jury: <\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153You are the sole judges of the facts: but you must follow the law as stated
\nin my instructions, whether you agree with it or not.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/i>  (Editor\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s
\nnote: Simply a lie.  All jurors in the United States have the right to
\nacquit if they think the judge is incorrect in his definition of the law, if
\nthey think the law is a bad law, or if their conscience tells them the
\ndefendant is being abused by the prosecution or judge. http:\/\/www.fija.org\/) <\/p>\n

<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153It is your duty to find from the evidence what the facts are.  You
\nwill then apply the law, as I give it to you, to those facts.  You must
\nfollow my instructions on the law, even if you thought  the law was
\ndifferent or should be different.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d  <\/i>(Editor\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s note:  See above
\nnotation.)  <\/p>\n

 Compare the above quote from earlier ones in his instructions to the
\njury:  <\/p>\n

“Each of you must make your own conscientious decision<\/u><\/b>, but
\nonly after you have considered all the evidence, discussed it fully with your
\nfellow jurors, and listened to the views of your fellow jurors.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153You are entitled to consider that evidence in the light of your own
\nobservations and experiences in the affairs of life<\/u><\/b>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d). <\/i>Emphasis is
\nmine. <\/p>\n

About the defense introducing and interpreting the Second Amendment as evidence
\nHendren had this to say:  \u00e2\u20ac\u0153\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6and I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know that I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve got a problem
\nwith that, but I think that there would be a problem if the matter were going
\nto be submitted to the jury about whether they think that is what the First
\nAmendment \u00e2\u20ac\u201c the Second Amendment \u00e2\u20ac\u201c says or not, because that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not a matter for
\nthe jury to decide.  The Court will tell it what the law is, the
\napplicable law.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d  <\/p>\n

<\/i>On the role of the judge and that of the jury Hendren makes this arrogant
\nand errant barrage of affluent: <\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153The judge, being myself in this case, is tasked with determining issues of
\nlaw, evidence, (sic) and procedure.  Those matters are not for the
\nconsideration of the jury.  It would be unfair to put it to them. 
\nThey are not legally trained.  They\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not judges.  They\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not
\ntrained and hopefully experienced (sic).  They\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not experienced in such
\nthings.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n

<\/i>In other words, according to Hendren, American citizens who sit on a jury
\nare too stupid to be there.  Why, then, I ask, do we even have
\njuries?  Hendren, obviously, considers juries one of life\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s burdens put
\nupon judges. <\/p>\n

So what to think? <\/p>\n

I think that Hendren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s chicanery, evasion and ambivalent stratagem points to
\nthe existence today of the very thing that our forefathers sought to avoid
\nthrough the Constitution \u00e2\u20ac\u201c a dictatorial judiciary that sets the rules for the
\nother two \u00e2\u20ac\u0153co-equal\u00e2\u20ac\u009d  branches of government and the citizenry a large. <\/p>\n

I think that there are men who are so unlimited in ego and self delusion that
\nthey not only break the rules and laws of society\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6they indeed break the bonds
\nof humility that must govern civilized society.  <\/p>\n

Jimm Hendren does not judge\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6he cheats.<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A DISHONEST MAN By Don A. Bright U.S. District Judge Jimm Larry Hendren is a dishonest man.  Hendren practices dishonesty in the most devious and destructive form there is.  Hendren lies for the State.  Hendren lies in order to keep the benefits of power:  Power for himself and power for others of his ilk who … Continue reading A Dishonest Man<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fincher"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arkansasfreedom.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}