Was the unconstitutional arrest of Hollis Wayne Fincher intended
\nto be another Ruby Ridge, Waco or the travesty of Border Patrol agents Ramos
\nand Campean\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s trumped-up arrest and conviction.<\/p>\n
The arraignment of Fincher so indicated: BATFE agent Wade Vittatow It appears Vittatow and the other 7 enforcement agencies The order to ensnare Fincher came from New Orleans via \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Jury perjury\u00e2\u20ac\u009d is a practice of the BATFE. <\/span>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Star Chamber\u00e2\u20ac\u009d tactics were employed: <\/span>the person on trial is not allowed to present Prosecutor Balfe\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s response to Motion for Arrest of Judgment Balfe\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s case rested on a violation of the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Commerce Clause\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, The Feds, like children, change the rules of the game, and Joe McCutchen<\/p>\n Fort Smith<\/p>\n 479-646-8261<\/p>\n Was the unconstitutional arrest of Hollis Wayne Fincher intended to be another Ruby Ridge, Waco or the travesty of Border Patrol agents Ramos and Campean\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s trumped-up arrest and conviction. The arraignment of Fincher so indicated: BATFE agent Wade Vittatow spouted venom vilifying Fincher stating Fincher\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s home was in the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153boondocks\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, implying Fincher was hiding from … Continue reading Fincher another Ruby Ridge?<\/span>
\nspouted venom vilifying Fincher <\/span>stating
\nFincher\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s home was in the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153boondocks\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, implying
\n<\/span>Fincher was <\/span>hiding from federal
\njackboots, then an admonition that the road was so bad leading to the Fincher
\nhomestead that an attack on Fincher could produce casualties. <\/p>\n
\nwere set on provoking a shootout with Fincher.
\n<\/span>What explanation can be ascertained from 8 law enforcement agencies, one
\nsnitch (entrapment that produced nothing) and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer
\ndollars to illegally snare one patriot? Judge Hendren and Congressman Boozman
\nstated Fincher is a patriot. Why conviction and incarceration?<\/p>\n
\ndual-citizen Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.<\/p>\n
\ntheir defense to the jury and the jury is not allowed to hear the statements of
\nthe defendant, which is \u00e2\u20ac\u0153jury tampering\u00e2\u20ac\u009d. <\/span>Both unconstitutional.<\/p>\n
\nfailed to prove their case. Fincher was not allowed to use the 2nd<\/sup>
\nAmendment in his defense, yet Balfe selectively used the Constitution in his Arrest
\nof Judgment response, citing two federal statutes he claimed were within the authority
\ngranted to Congress by the Constitution.
\n<\/span>Where ? The Constitution is not subservient to Federal statutes.<\/p>\n
\nmaking it incumbent on him to prove, he failed. <\/p>\n
\nin so doing have made the Constitution irrelevant.<\/p>\n