Category Archives: Presidential Candidates

Republican Whores Attack Republican Representative for being Politically Incorrect


Republican Whores in Full Retreat. (See article below)                October 7, 2012

It’s not Politically correct but the U.S. is a racial jungle and a tinderbox that can explode at any time. The hordes of 3rd World immigrants, legal & illegal, are not here to embrace the Constitution.  Proof of this lies in the fact that each of the myriads of ethnic invaders bring with them their failed cultures and philosophies.  The invasions are by design compliments of the corrupt federal government.

The questions, opinions, and facts published in Rep. Jon Hubbard’s book are legitimate.  The question he poses which is paraphrased…are Blacks better off under the government welfare system, the cotton plantation system, or their homes in Africa?

Blacks, due to much needed Civil Rights legislation, have enjoyed more freedoms and more entitlements (which ultimately brought them down) than any other racial group in the history of man…ponder the results—crime, illegitimacy, welfare, unemployment, education, ad infinitum. The racial whores, both Democrat & Republican are refusing to bring this scandalous crisis to the table for debate so some peaceful and constructive resolution can be achieved. Evidently, it’s all about the spoils.

There is no concern about stability in our state or nation, racial harmony, adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law…it is about politicians & bureaucrats wrapping their greedy greasy arms around the spoils.

The Republican whores (make no mistake there are Democrat whores) have no problem trampling Rep. Jon Hubbard’s First Amendment rights which pose questions and opinions and if not addressed will further erode our republic in the near term.
 
Like all hurlers of expletives and incendiaries they never logically defend their positions.
I recently sent out a 4 page piece headlining that the Republican Party would be irrelevant after Nov. 6, 2012, regardless of which candidate wins the presidency. Here is a graphic example: GOP Chairman Doyle Webb call Hubbard’s book highly offensive.  Chairman Webb, detail what you find offensive.  U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford called the writings divisive and racially inflammatory.  Rep. Crawford, how so? Crawford went on to make a libelous statement “The statements that have been reported portray attitudes and beliefs that would return our state and country to a harmful and regrettable past”.  Rep. Crawford, your statement is a bald-faced lie…and I believe you are running for re-election.  U.S. Congressman Tim Griffin came forth with this piece of emotionalism, “Statements of Hubbard are ridiculous, outrageous, and have no place in the civil discourse of either party”. Congressman, please explain why it has no place in civil discourse. Your piety is overwhelming. You too are running for re-election and aren’t you the same boy that Bush put in as a Federal Prosecutor in the Little Rock district after his notorious purge?

Back to Webb, who has wallowed in the State House for decades.  Webb stated the writings “were highly offensive to many Americans”.  Not much allegiance to truth Webb…P.C. remains supreme.

Mr. Webb: May I tell you what I find highly offensive:
1.    Political cowardice.
2.    Presidential candidate Romney, a 4 time draft dodger.
3.    Romney’s five sons refuse to serve in the military.
4.    Neocon warmonger Candidate Romney stated he did not have to have congressional authority to attack Iran.
5.    Romney is the progenitor of Obamacare and states on a regular basis he will retain most of it that he likes.
6.    Candidate Romney will authorize the continuation of Obama’s amnesty pact which will further exacerbate the ills of Black & White America.
7.    Romney’s foreign policy is totally controlled by dual citizen Israelis.
8.    Only a tip of the iceberg.

The three have demonstrated they have no regard for the Constitution, the ideals it gives rise to, the truth, the rule of law, and sovereignty.  It’s all about the Spoils.

Rep. Jon Hubbard dared to bring up a very troubling aspect of America today…the state of Black America, which no government entity dares to discuss or bring some resolution.
So again, are Black Americans better off today with all their unearned largesse, coupled with all their failures and being paid for by hard pressed White America in the main or were they better off in their native Africa or later on the cotton plantations? Until the advent of Civil Rights legislation Blacks had the most cohesive family relationships and were extremely religious.  Observe the statistics.

The question is legitimate and a very difficult one, but must be discussed & debated without fear or intimidation before it destroys the republic.  I believe neither party has the honesty or the courage.

Our elected officials should be men & women of honor & courage, not political whores. Lies dominate every political decision.

Our thanks to Rep. Hubbard for addressing highly charged racial questions with honesty and courage.

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net   

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ARKANSAS_REPUBLICANS_RACE?SITE=NCAGW&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-10-06-19-03-17 />
 

WORLD | Today’s News, Christian Views

Ark. GOP calls candidates’ statements ‘offensive’

By CHUCK BARTELS
Associated Press
 
AP Photo/Lori McElroy

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Arkansas Republicans tried to distance themselves Saturday from a Republican state representative’s assertion that slavery was a “blessing in disguise” and a Republican state House candidate who advocates deporting all Muslims.

The claims were made in books written, respectively, by Rep. Jon Hubbard of Jonesboro and House candidate Charlie Fuqua of Batesville. Those books received attention on Internet news sites Friday.

On Saturday, state GOP Chairman Doyle Webb called the books “highly offensive.” And U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford, a Republican who represents northeast Arkansas, called the writings “divisive and racially inflammatory.”

Hubbard wrote in his 2009 self-published book, “Letters To The Editor: Confessions Of A Frustrated Conservative,” that “the institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise.” He also wrote that African-Americans were better off than they would have been had they not been captured and shipped to the United States.

Fuqua, who served in the Arkansas House from 1996 to 1998, wrote there is “no solution to the Muslim problem short of expelling all followers of the religion from the United States,” in his 2012 book, titled “God’s Law.”

Fuqua said Saturday that he hadn’t realized he’d become a target within his own party, which he said surprised him.

“I think my views are fairly well-accepted by most people,” Fuqua said before hanging up, saying he was busy knocking on voters’ doors. The attorney is running against incumbent Democratic Rep. James McLean in House District 63.

Hubbard, a marketing representative, didn’t return voicemail messages seeking comment Saturday. He is running against Democrat Harold Copenhaver in House District 58.

The November elections could be a crucial turning point in Arkansas politics. Democrats hold narrow majorities in both chambers, but the GOP has been working hard to swing the Legislature its way for the first time since the end of the Civil War, buoyed by picking up three congressional seats in 2010. Their efforts have also been backed by an influx of money from national political action committees.

Rep. Crawford said Saturday he was “disappointed and disturbed.”

“The statements that have been reported portray attitudes and beliefs that would return our state and country to a harmful and regrettable past,” Crawford said.

U.S. Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark., kicked off the GOP’s response Saturday by issuing a release, saying the “statements of Hubbard and Fuqua are ridiculous, outrageous and have no place in the civil discourse of either party.”

“Had I known of these statements, I would not have contributed to their campaigns. I am requesting that they give my contributions to charity,” said Griffin, who donated $100 to each candidate.

The Arkansas Republican House Caucus followed, saying the views of Hubbard and Fuqua “are in no way reflective of, or endorsed by, the Republican caucus. The constituencies they are seeking to represent will ultimately judge these statements at the ballot box.”

Then Webb, who has spearheaded the party’s attempt to control the Legislature, said the writings “were highly offensive to many Americans and do not reflect the viewpoints of the Republican Party of Arkansas. While we respect their right to freedom of expression and thought, we strongly disagree with those ideas.”

Webb, though, accused state Democrats of using the issue as a distraction.

Democrats themselves have been largely silent, aside from the state party’s tweet and Facebook post calling attention to the writings. A Democratic Party spokesman didn’t immediately return a call for comment Saturday.

The two candidates share other political and religious views on their campaign websites.

Hubbard, who sponsored a failed bill in 2011 that would have severely restricted immigration, wrote on his website that the issue is still among his priorities, as is doing “whatever I can to defend, protect and preserve our Christian heritage.”

Fuqua blogs on his website. One post is titled, “Christianity in Retreat,” and says “there is a strange alliance between the liberal left and the Muslim religion.”

“Both are antichrist in that they both deny that Jesus is God in the flesh of man, and the savior of mankind. They both also hold that their cause should take over the entire world through violent, bloody, revolution,” the post says.

In a separate passage, Fuqua wrote “we now have a president that has a well documented history with both the Muslim religion and Communism.”

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CONCEPT OF PEACE?


THE REAL STATE OF AFFAIRS—PEACE IS NOT ON THE HORIZON

PEACE, WAR, 2 FRAUDULENT, UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES & COME NOV. 2012 THE IRRELEVANCY OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY REGARDLESS OF WHO WINS.    October 1, 2012

Peace, the word that has been removed from the American lexicon, i.e. the transformation of the Republic of the USA, formerly the bastion of peace and opportunity, to a now murderous juggernaut running on empty. Speaking of the American lexicon, note the word ILLEGAL is being axed and replaced with UNDOCUMENTED  as it relates to illegal immigration, more governmental political correctness, i.e. government prescribing what language it deems allowable.  Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editor Paul Greenberg evidently agrees.

Americans, for whatever the reasons, continue to wallow in the shallowness of the criminally corrupt Democrat & Republican parties, one offers redistribution of wealth and the other, eternal war.

Neither presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama or Republican Mitt Romney offers any substance in their respective candidacies, why should they, most Americans are willing to make their presidential choices on lies, hot air, spin and a marriage to one or the other aforementioned two political parties, America’ death knell. Proof of the above lies in the fact that Americans foolishly return incumbents to office for decades and seemingly do not understand that incumbents are responsible for the present sordid and critical state of affairs in which our nation finds itself.  Look no further than Arkansas: 3rd  political generation Senator Mark Pryor, 25 years in the trough; Senator John Boozman, 12 years; and Governor Mike Beebe, 35 years on the taxpayer teat.  Suppression of new and/or dissenting ideas?

Critiquing one of the major causes of the American collapse we need not go back any further than the administration of former president Bill Clinton, upon whose order, without a declaration of war and without cause, militarily destroyed the former Yugoslavian republic, with emphasis on Serbia and Kosovo.  The preemptive strike was murderous savagery and posed many questions and no answers.

Moving forward to the late ‘90’s a plan was formulated, by neoconservative Jewish & American Zionists that mandated an attack on Iraq. All that was needed was an excuse, 911 presented the excuse, and the murderous depraved carnage served as propaganda to ignite the attack on Iraq built on lies spewed by the U.S. government and Israel Firsters.  Who’s to say how many Americans believe the savagery was produced by only 19 Saudi Arabians?  If the Trade Towers, and I emphasize IF , were destroyed by 19 Saudis why attack Iraq and not Saudi Arabia? Why were the 19 not located and executed as opposed to attacking a sovereign nation which was certainly no threat to the U.S. and in fact was considered a friend and factually possessed no weapons of mass destruction? Same goes for Iran. The Iranian nuke is a grand hoax, designed to hide Israel’s real agenda. The International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspectors and the CIA have stated on numerous occasions there is no Iranian engagement in developing a nuclear weapon.  The attack on Iraq resulting in 5,000 U.S. military deaths coupled with 40,000 wounded and maimed, alongside 100,000+ Iraqis killed was a heinous criminal act orchestrated by Pres. G.W. Bush and his administration.  Relate this to the 2,000 U.S. military killed in Afghanistan.  Saddam Hussein/Iraq was an asset of the U.S government and vividly portrays when a human U.S. asset has outlived its usefulness they are summarily executed mafia style. Other Mideastern leaders who have met the same destiny were Osama bin Laden/Afghanistan, President Muammar Quadaffi/Libya, Hosni Mubarrak/Egypt…all U.S. assets, to name a few.  The vile attack on Iraq led to 6 more preemptive attacks on sovereign nations, accompanied by U.S. stealth attacks in Pakistan.  We are engaged in no-win 11+ year illegal wars labeled euphemistically a “war on terrorism” and still evolving, built on lies, subterfuge, and murder resulting in zero accomplishments, using and abusing the U.S. military serving only as cannon fodder at a cost of $1 Trillion (part & parcel of the $16 Trillion debt), while satisfying U.S. neoconservative Republicans & Israeli War Lords’ ambitions for Mideast hegemony, oil, e.g. a pipeline from Iraq to Haifa, Israel, and water from southern Lebanon.  As this is being written, Benjamin Netanyahu, accompanied by theatrics and lies, is fanning the flames of war at the U.N. to be instituted against Iran, urging Republican neocons to take the lead in another illegal, unnecessary war doing Israel’s dirty work. Israel has over 800 nuclear warheads and never signed the non-nuclear proliferation treaty.  Iran has signed.

Many Americans are gullible, ignorant, emotional, lazy and/or just plain stupid to swallow the lies and attacks on the U.S.  Constitution, most of which emanate from the seat of U.S. government, brought to us by both Democrat & Republican parties.  There are 535 (excluding the Pauls) identifiable elected traitors in D.C. with crimes ranging from dereliction of duty to outright complicity in interventionism, and everything in between… the definition of a systemically corrupt country.

Enter Barack Hussein Obama, who said if elected president he would “fundamentally change America”, that he has done, directly to a Marxist regime.

Obama has installed Marxism in every facet of American government. The major contributing factor with the ease that he has ‘fundamentally changed America” is the result of unbridled mass immigration, legal and illegal, most of whom are 3rd World nationals who have no understanding of the U.S. Constitution and its demands. The 3rd World intruders have shown no desire to acculturate or adopt Western culture but have an insatiable appetite for welfare spoils, which is unconstitutional and can be expected to vote overwhelmingly Democrat.  The federal government, by design, has no intention of securing our national borders and deporting the illegal population which is now estimated to be 25-35 million, back to their homeland. It’s the vote stupid for  the democrat’s and cheap labor for the Republicans. And the Democrats win the day & the country. Both political parties are campaigning on the notion that middleclass America must be resuscitated while at the same time the hordes of Hispanic and OTM invaders are overrunning white middleclass Americans. A deadly oxymoron?  2-3 million legal & illegal aliens penetrate our borders on a yearly basis and both parties have underwritten the death of middleclass America and the Republican Party.  Our former preeminent republic has disintegrated from within…from a majority White Founding population to a now evolving 3rd World dumping ground, a nation now home to hundreds of ethnic groups fighting for their individual slices of the welfare pie, giving rise to a smug Collectivist Barack Hussein Obama garnering the majority vote of the 3rd World invaders while displacing the productive middleclass who built and have sustained the American republic. November 6, 2012, due to a 3rd World dominance will signify the demise of the Republican Party and in all likelihood America.  The national Republican Party becomes irrelevant.  Aside from the 3rd World population shift, Republican cowardice, a quest for power, and a nexus with corporations all prevent the Republican leadership from securing of our sovereign borders. Bush II’s administration, had all the tools & refused to act, precisely why Democrat Marxism will outflank Republican neo-conservatism.  Illegal & legal invasions are intensifying, e.g. Arkansas Rep. Tim Griffin pushed a measure that would expand immigration for high-tech graduates by 55,000 & grant permanent status, no citizenship required.  To magnify the crisis: data reported by the Fort Smith, AR. School district noted that white population dropped from 56.5% during 2004-05 school year to a low of 45.6%. In that same period the district containing 14,000 students increased by 1,000 whose home language was not English. 70% of the district’s students are on “free meals”, therefore; what is the endgame? Minority Whites are paying the tariff for the 70% on welfare, most of which are the majority “minorities”. This scenario is growing exponentially, all by design, compliments of the 535 identifiable elected D.C. traitors. What has just been described is the national tapestry.

What ethnic group is responsible and fuels mass immigration, legal & illegal?

Reverting back to the statement regarding incumbents. The incumbents American citizens reelect for decades is another major reason the U.S. in is the quandary it finds itself resulting from corrupt self-serving politicians/bureaucrats who refuse to abide by the Constitution, the rule of law and their sworn obligations to the people. They are our real enemies.

March 12, 2011, Barack Obama unilaterally and on his personal order called for stealth bombing and rocketry to be launched against the sovereign nation of Libya.  In the first few days of Obama’s intervention over 1,000 U.S. predator drones were launched at Tripoli and Benghazi, while at the same time the U.S. government was arming Israel with 30,000# Bunker Busters. Why?  On March 19, 2011 Obama stated that U.S. involvement in Libya would last “days, not weeks”.  The U.S. is now 1 ½ years enmeshed in Obama’s self-proclaimed war with the loss of unknown numbers of U.S. military and one Ambassador. Another blatant, preemptive attack on another non-threatening sovereign nation, orchestrated this time by Obama and his minions. The $16 Trillion national debt, compliments of both political regimes, and Obamacare are more highways to the national abyss.

The Republicans are all so quiet about Obama’s murderous Libyan thuggery.  How could Republicans chastise Obama when they have their neoconservative crosses to bear, i.e. Afghanistan & Iraq?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is consumed by arrogance and hubris, spewing his hatred of Iran and Syria and is commanding & demanding the U.S. attack the two immediately unilaterally.  Americans hear the constant drumbeat that “Israel is our friend”.  Again, I challenge Americans to show one instance that Israel has demonstrated she is a friend of the U.S.  Recall Israel attacking the USS Liberty slaughtering 34 U.S. seamen, wounding 171 out of a crew of 297; allowing the Mossad to maintain a huge spy network within our borders; stealing & selling our most sensitive commercial & military secrets to China, etc.   Washington, D.C. has become Tel Aviv South. The American congress is mortally fearful of Jewish organizations, e.g. AIPAC, ADL, AJL, JINSA, SPLC, and a host of hundreds and does their bidding without questions. Note: AIPAC is an illegal foreign national lobbying and spy organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a “consultant” if you can believe it for the FBI & the DHS!  Our decade’s long wars are principally at the behest of Jewish interests. Examine if you will the inner sanctorum of D.C. politics.  Our nation, in spite of Israel’s transgressions, dispenses billions to the Postage Stamp country, which receives more U.S. foreign aid than all the rest of the countries around the globe combined.  What fools we are. The global Jewish population controls & owns international finance, therefore; the question is again posed…why are hardworking middleclass American taxpayers’ dollars subsidizing Israel, or any other foreign nation?  Recall our $16 Trillion national debt and $75 Trillion in unfunded mandates (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid).

It is written that many Republicans are holding their collective noses and will vote for presidential candidate Mitt Romney, i.e. the lesser of two evils. Who’s to say which of the two is most evil or less evil?  Republicans deserve what they are going to get for their barbarous treatment of the real American Constitutional candidate, Congressman Ron Paul.

A topical examination of the Republican neoconservative presidential candidate:  Examine Romney’s foreign policy team…Dov Zakheim, Robert Kagan, Michael Chertoff, Elliot Cohen, Eric Edelman, John Lehman, Evan Feigenbaum, Aaron Friedberg, Kent Lucken, Kristen Silverberg, Cofer Black, Paula Dobriansky…all dual-citizen Israelis.   Question: Where does their allegiance lie? Again, American stupidity reigns supreme.  How many of these are not Sayanim? The above dual-citizen individuals are only a tip of the iceberg.

Romney’s best friend, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is demanding the U.S. attack Iran.  The Jewish influence in Washington continues on & on & on. Question: Why is the U.S. dancing attendance to Jewish interests interminably instead of our own rational best self- interests?

Mitt Romney is a rapacious, imperialist wrapped in the American flag.  An inside supporter of a NEW WORLD ORDER.  Romney advocates more global meddling and more wars. Note: diplomacy and dialogue are absent and Romney’s battle cry “eternal war for eternal peace” beckons.

Recall if you will, former governor Romney stated May, 2012 why none of his 5 sons—all perfect candidates for military service—had come forward to serve in the wars Romney supports enthusiastically?  Romney’s response was “My sons are adults. They chose not to serve in the military in active duty, and I respect their decision in that regard…And one of the ways my sons is showing support for our nation is helping me get elected, because they think I’d be a great president”.  Furthermore; presidential candidate Romney received 4 deferrals in the Viet Nam war.  This is the candidate who stated in June, 2012 that he did not need congressional authority to attack Syria & Iran…and in all likelihood that would be accomplished in 2013 if he’s elected president. The warmongering, Republican neoconservative Romney is more than willing to send my grandchildren and yours to the phony “war on terrorism” while he and his family personify cowardice in opulence.  Note: those who cry loudest for war are never those battling on the front lines. Founding Father Ben Franklin stated when queried by a woman asking what type of government the Founders had provided…Franklin’s answer was “A Republic, if you can keep it’. Most Americans have betrayed the Founders.

Let it be said that huge numbers of Orthodox Jews do not support the warlike Zionists and have warm relationships and high regard for President Ahmadinejad and have not fallen for the cascade of D.C. lies.

A real American patriot will refrain from voting for either one of the two. Both candidates are growing the crisis.   It is the only way citizens can demonstrate their absolute abhorrence and revulsion for the two presidential candidates and the two political parties.

This piece is meant to chronicle recent and past events that put our republic in harm’s way. For those who have political & religious positions that may differ from the facts that have been presented here, please do not hurl one-word incendiaries, e.g. anti-Semite, bigot, racist, xenophobe, etc.  Emotional diatribes solve nothing; civil debate is what is needed, without a fear factor.  Currently those folks hurling the incendiaries never defend their positions.

In this case you do not have to choose your poison, write in a 3rd party candidate or refuse to vote for either.  In this way you show your contempt for the traitorous candidates and Parties.

It’s the Republic.  What happened to the preeminent republic who championed peace, individual responsibilities and liberties?

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

Republican Whores Attack Republican Representative for being Politically Incorrect


Republican Whores in Full Retreat. (See article below)                October 7, 2012

It’s not Politically correct but the U.S. is a racial jungle and a tinderbox that can explode at any time. The hordes of 3rd World immigrants, legal & illegal, are not here to embrace the Constitution.  Proof of this lies in the fact that each of the myriads of ethnic invaders bring with them their failed cultures and philosophies.  The invasions are by design compliments of the corrupt federal government.

The questions, opinions, and facts published in Rep. Jon Hubbard’s book are legitimate.  The question he poses which is paraphrased…are Blacks better off under the government welfare system, the cotton plantation system, or their homes in Africa?

Blacks, due to much needed Civil Rights legislation, have enjoyed more freedoms and more entitlements (which ultimately brought them down) than any other racial group in the history of man…ponder the results—crime, illegitimacy, welfare, unemployment, education, ad infinitum. The racial whores, both Democrat & Republican are refusing to bring this scandalous crisis to the table for debate so some peaceful and constructive resolution can be achieved. Evidently, it’s all about the spoils.

There is no concern about stability in our state or nation, racial harmony, adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law…it is about politicians & bureaucrats wrapping their greedy greasy arms around the spoils.

The Republican whores (make no mistake there are Democrat whores) have no problem trampling Rep. Jon Hubbard’s First Amendment rights which pose questions and opinions and if not addressed will further erode our republic in the near term.
 
Like all hurlers of expletives and incendiaries they never logically defend their positions.
I recently sent out a 4 page piece headlining that the Republican Party would be irrelevant after Nov. 6, 2012, regardless of which candidate wins the presidency. Here is a graphic example: GOP Chairman Doyle Webb call Hubbard’s book highly offensive.  Chairman Webb, detail what you find offensive.  U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford called the writings divisive and racially inflammatory.  Rep. Crawford, how so? Crawford went on to make a libelous statement “The statements that have been reported portray attitudes and beliefs that would return our state and country to a harmful and regrettable past”.  Rep. Crawford, your statement is a bald-faced lie…and I believe you are running for re-election.  U.S. Congressman Tim Griffin came forth with this piece of emotionalism, “Statements of Hubbard are ridiculous, outrageous, and have no place in the civil discourse of either party”. Congressman, please explain why it has no place in civil discourse. Your piety is overwhelming. You too are running for re-election and aren’t you the same boy that Bush put in as a Federal Prosecutor in the Little Rock district after his notorious purge?

Back to Webb, who has wallowed in the State House for decades.  Webb stated the writings “were highly offensive to many Americans”.  Not much allegiance to truth Webb…P.C. remains supreme.

Mr. Webb: May I tell you what I find highly offensive:
1.    Political cowardice.
2.    Presidential candidate Romney, a 4 time draft dodger.
3.    Romney’s five sons refuse to serve in the military.
4.    Neocon warmonger Candidate Romney stated he did not have to have congressional authority to attack Iran.
5.    Romney is the progenitor of Obamacare and states on a regular basis he will retain most of it that he likes.
6.    Candidate Romney will authorize the continuation of Obama’s amnesty pact which will further exacerbate the ills of Black & White America.
7.    Romney’s foreign policy is totally controlled by dual citizen Israelis.
8.    Only a tip of the iceberg.

The three have demonstrated they have no regard for the Constitution, the ideals it gives rise to, the truth, the rule of law, and sovereignty.  It’s all about the Spoils.

Rep. Jon Hubbard dared to bring up a very troubling aspect of America today…the state of Black America, which no government entity dares to discuss or bring some resolution.
So again, are Black Americans better off today with all their unearned largesse, coupled with all their failures and being paid for by hard pressed White America in the main or were they better off in their native Africa or later on the cotton plantations? Until the advent of Civil Rights legislation Blacks had the most cohesive family relationships and were extremely religious.  Observe the statistics.

The question is legitimate and a very difficult one, but must be discussed & debated without fear or intimidation before it destroys the republic.  I believe neither party has the honesty or the courage.

Our elected officials should be men & women of honor & courage, not political whores. Lies dominate every political decision.

Our thanks to Rep. Hubbard for addressing highly charged racial questions with honesty and courage.

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net   

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ARKANSAS_REPUBLICANS_RACE?SITE=NCAGW&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-10-06-19-03-17 />
 

WORLD | Today’s News, Christian Views

Ark. GOP calls candidates’ statements ‘offensive’

By CHUCK BARTELS
Associated Press
 
AP Photo/Lori McElroy

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Arkansas Republicans tried to distance themselves Saturday from a Republican state representative’s assertion that slavery was a “blessing in disguise” and a Republican state House candidate who advocates deporting all Muslims.

The claims were made in books written, respectively, by Rep. Jon Hubbard of Jonesboro and House candidate Charlie Fuqua of Batesville. Those books received attention on Internet news sites Friday.

On Saturday, state GOP Chairman Doyle Webb called the books “highly offensive.” And U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford, a Republican who represents northeast Arkansas, called the writings “divisive and racially inflammatory.”

Hubbard wrote in his 2009 self-published book, “Letters To The Editor: Confessions Of A Frustrated Conservative,” that “the institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise.” He also wrote that African-Americans were better off than they would have been had they not been captured and shipped to the United States.

Fuqua, who served in the Arkansas House from 1996 to 1998, wrote there is “no solution to the Muslim problem short of expelling all followers of the religion from the United States,” in his 2012 book, titled “God’s Law.”

Fuqua said Saturday that he hadn’t realized he’d become a target within his own party, which he said surprised him.

“I think my views are fairly well-accepted by most people,” Fuqua said before hanging up, saying he was busy knocking on voters’ doors. The attorney is running against incumbent Democratic Rep. James McLean in House District 63.

Hubbard, a marketing representative, didn’t return voicemail messages seeking comment Saturday. He is running against Democrat Harold Copenhaver in House District 58.

The November elections could be a crucial turning point in Arkansas politics. Democrats hold narrow majorities in both chambers, but the GOP has been working hard to swing the Legislature its way for the first time since the end of the Civil War, buoyed by picking up three congressional seats in 2010. Their efforts have also been backed by an influx of money from national political action committees.

Rep. Crawford said Saturday he was “disappointed and disturbed.”

“The statements that have been reported portray attitudes and beliefs that would return our state and country to a harmful and regrettable past,” Crawford said.

U.S. Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark., kicked off the GOP’s response Saturday by issuing a release, saying the “statements of Hubbard and Fuqua are ridiculous, outrageous and have no place in the civil discourse of either party.”

“Had I known of these statements, I would not have contributed to their campaigns. I am requesting that they give my contributions to charity,” said Griffin, who donated $100 to each candidate.

The Arkansas Republican House Caucus followed, saying the views of Hubbard and Fuqua “are in no way reflective of, or endorsed by, the Republican caucus. The constituencies they are seeking to represent will ultimately judge these statements at the ballot box.”

Then Webb, who has spearheaded the party’s attempt to control the Legislature, said the writings “were highly offensive to many Americans and do not reflect the viewpoints of the Republican Party of Arkansas. While we respect their right to freedom of expression and thought, we strongly disagree with those ideas.”

Webb, though, accused state Democrats of using the issue as a distraction.

Democrats themselves have been largely silent, aside from the state party’s tweet and Facebook post calling attention to the writings. A Democratic Party spokesman didn’t immediately return a call for comment Saturday.

The two candidates share other political and religious views on their campaign websites.

Hubbard, who sponsored a failed bill in 2011 that would have severely restricted immigration, wrote on his website that the issue is still among his priorities, as is doing “whatever I can to defend, protect and preserve our Christian heritage.”

Fuqua blogs on his website. One post is titled, “Christianity in Retreat,” and says “there is a strange alliance between the liberal left and the Muslim religion.”

“Both are antichrist in that they both deny that Jesus is God in the flesh of man, and the savior of mankind. They both also hold that their cause should take over the entire world through violent, bloody, revolution,” the post says.

In a separate passage, Fuqua wrote “we now have a president that has a well documented history with both the Muslim religion and Communism.”

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

Party of Lincoln vs. Tea Party

Republican Party…The Party of Lincoln? 

If you haven’t read The Real Lincoln by Thomas Dilorenzo or done real investigation you do not know the truth about what Abe Lincoln actually did to accomplish his goals.

Now that the truth is out about his Dictatorship: his actions to crush all opposition; his imprisonment of dissenters including legislators, newsmen, leaders of all sorts; his disdain for blacks & desire to ship them back to Africa (the war was not about slavery but about expanding the union and taxes to subsidize the north) ; his unfairly heavy-handed taxation on the South; his ruthless policies of wiping out not only soldiers, but women, children, old folks (white & black) and of destroying their property and their ability to grow their food. He sent Grant, Sherman & Sheridan to rape, murder, rob, burn crops, kill livestock and otherwise devastate the South. They were so successful in this horrific endeavor it literally took the South at least 100 yrs to recover from their genocidal actions. It is important to note that since the South’s finest young men were killed, there were none of their ancestors to carry forth their fire for liberty.  Lincoln made war on his own people who had every constitutional right to secede from an oppressive central government.

After the war Lincoln sent Sheridan & Sherman west to execute another genocide, this time on the American Indians.  Again, these ghastly ghouls were successful.   Again, “man’s inhumanity to man” (Robert Burns, 1784) is painted vividly on the canvas of history.

To the victor go the spoils and the ability to propagandize history, and that has successfully been accomplished.

Such is the Republican Party of today. Loudly pontificating on subjects of patriotism and religion…a Kabuki Dance, if you will, in order to placate and entertain their followers. Posing as the defenders of freedom against “maniacal” middle-easterners…yet, they have not secured our borders or deported significant numbers of invaders of any stripe.  Making war makes lots of money for some folks and protects certain special interests, foreign and domestic. The neoconservative’s Icon Leo Strauss advocated “eternal war for eternal peace”, i.e. war forever.  What a horrific oxymoron and only morons/madmen would advocate it.

Notice the sudden return of George Bush, the main reason we are saddled with the likes of Obama. Hopefully that will be a tactical mistake by the neoconservative Republicans who are poised for a return to power.  Neo-conservatism has been defined by so many and myriads of times…if anyone still doesn’t understand please go to arkansasfreedom.net to the Neocon category or research the writings of Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan, Paul Craig Roberts, et al.

Lincoln wanted national hegemony, the Neocons want global hegemony.  Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus and Posse Comitatus…so did Bush and the Neocons.  Lincoln engaged in genocide…so are the Neocons in the Balkans and the Mid-East (not to mention our own troops), with the Lib/Communists along for the ride with their own twisted agenda.  Lincoln’s cruelty and callous disregard for individual lives & rights are being repeated by the Neocons.  Lincoln gave no quarter…the Neocons sanction torture, rendition and other uncivilized, unspeakable acts….sneering & smearing outraged dissenters.

Lincoln was eloquent and spoke many high sounding words…the Neocons preach religion and patriotism…both disguising their true, dark agendas. Lincoln striped dissidents of their citizenship and freedoms…the neocons and now Obama have instigated executive orders which authorize the president to have any person executed whom the president deems a “terrorist” or danger to the government.

Lincoln had his conscripts, mercenaries, indentured servants & prisoners, etc….the Neocons have their duped patriots & dregs looking for a living off the system, serving as cannon fodder.  Lincoln eventually justified his actions with a rallying cry for the ending of “Slavery”…the Neocons have their contrived, convoluted, unconscionable, bloody “War on Terror” as their justification.

Many of the newspapers and publications of Lincoln’s day tried to tell the true facts and were punished severely for it….burned out, destroyed, imprisoned. Virtually all mainstream media today are controlled by spin & puppet masters, most of which desire global tyranny in some form over the masses and destruction of Western civilization…which of course means the end of the middleclass, of innovation, of property rights, and all other individual rights, freedoms and responsibilities.

Lincoln set the stage for dictatorship in the United StateS of America (states, not state) by defying our Founding Documents….subsequent presidents did little to stop that wave, in fact most facilitated the annihilation of those principles to the best of their abilities.  Bush, who stated that our Constitution was “just a G-D scrap of paper”, activated a pre-planned, undeclared, unconstitutional war on Iraq and Afghanistan, based on lies and deception. Interesting that he did not attack the country of the officially alleged terrorists who supposedly caused 9/11…Saudi Arabia. Why? And why does Obama continue in Bush’s bloody footsteps?  Answer: Qui Bono (who benefits)?.  The military/industrial complex, Israel, and the U.S. government/academia/media’s goal of a police state/tyranny.

Who or what stands in the way of the “Neoconservative” Republicans or the Cultural Marxist/Communist/Democrats?  At the moment it appears to be the Tea Party movement of true patriots who are in a struggle for their very existence, culture, heritage, rule of law and Founding Documents.

The Lincolnesque Republicans are struggling to coopt and control the Tea Party…the Marxist Democrats are struggling to smear, intimidate, silence, and wipe it out.  Both are salivating, fearful, anxious, mentally dysfunctional and extremely dangerous…and ironically the Republicans still call themselves the party of Lincoln.  Do they know how true that is?

The Neocon, Rino, Republicans are already vacillating and reneging.  For instance, first they were going to permanently ban earmarks, then some decided earmarks were valuable, e.g. Inhofe & McConnell, then they decided they wouldn’t ban them for more than 2 years (in time for 2012 elections).  Thanks guys for a perfect example. The only things we need from them is to defund and repeal all unconstitutional laws, acts, programs, agencies, treaties, agreements, et al.

Now they are trotting out old Neos, some to run for president, e.g. Newty, Romney, Huckabee, Barbour, Giuliani, Rick Perry, Jeb Bush, Thune, Cornyn.  Palin may not be “old”, but still a diehard neocon.

Hopefully the Tea Party can resist and reject both parties. Time is short and will soon tell.

~Barbara McCutchen

arkansasfreedom.net 

 

 

 

From Washington to Obama…a catastrophic attack on freedom.


From George Washington to Barak Hussein Obama. 

That sums up what our country has become.  From a gentleman schooled in such
Enlightenment concepts as individual freedom and rights and prepared to lead
the battle against tyranny in order to establish the first real Constitutional
Republic; now we have a Communist activist intent on “redistribution of wealth”…stealing
from the producers by force to disperse as “government” desires.

Washington fought and endured great privation with dignity,
impeccable ethics, and fierce loyalty to justice against those who would subdue
the new nation.  Obama is a self-serving,
power-hungry politician/activist, ego-maniac, eager to do anything it takes to
attain his collectivist goals. 

Washington conquered the enemy through courage and
dedication. Obama, probably not a legal citizen, works for and with known Communist,
anti-American activists dedicated to the destruction of all Western
Civilization, most of all the United States.

America once was the hope of the world, but no nations
followed our beginnings due to powerful, greedy “leaders”…their people too
ignorant or fearful…all by design…just as in our country.  As a people we have lost sight of justice,
truth, and the value of a single individual and allowed the Barbarians not only
within the Gates, but to remake our rugged individual philosophy into a sorry,
pathetic, tragic mess of victimhood, rule by the elite not law, brutality and
as Ayn Rand said ” punishment of the good for being good”.

Obama seeks to force us back to the jungle, out of which men
like George Washington led us. 

 

Barbara McCutchen

Ft. Smith


Where did the “Messiah” come from & whence endless money?

The Cloistered Messiah

By Don A. Bright

“Since the Bush Administration launched a misguided war in Iraq, its policy in
the Americas has been negligent toward our friends, ineffective with our
adversaries, disinterested in the challenges that matter in peoples’ lives, and
incapable of advancing our interests in the region. No wonder, then, that
demagogues like Hugo Chavez have stepped into this vacuum.” – Barack Obama,

“…it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion
or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or
anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” – Barack
Obama

…. we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling
if everybody was just inflating their tires.” – Barack Obama

“Part of what the next president has to do is not just tell the American people
what they want to hear, but what they need to hear.” – Barack Obama

What on earth would cause an intelligent and worldly (after he has been to all
57 states) person like Barack Obama to utter the above inanities? All the
rhetorical and myopic declarations by the fawning mainstream media to the
contrary, I have come to the conclusion that Obama is neither intelligent nor
is he that well-rounded. Indeed the man has led a very cloistered life and has
no real understanding of non-leftist thinking.

Obama’s life to this point has been one of almost monastic training and
experience. Vivid examples of his nescient elitism can be gleaned from his
telling references to the outside world. Phrases like the “common people”, the
“ordinary Americans” and “the working class” proclaim his cultist world view.
“I am not one of you”, he is saying. “I am going to “educate” you “other
people” and, if possible, elevate you to my caste” is the true thinking of this
man who has been taught that he is what the masses clamor for.

When Barack Obama makes these aristocratic references to the “people” he has no
idea of their inauthenticity and lack of reason. He confuses the non-reactionary
mainstream with his limited and reactionary cultism.

Barack Obama’s background has been limited by the tutorage of Chicago’s liberal
underground, the Messianic clamoring of the political waifs of moveon.org and
the misguided inculcating of black “liberation” theology hatred. His
protestations of being asleep during over 20 years of Wright’s sermons
notwithstanding, Obama heard those sermons and considered them mainstream. His
arrested response to the outrage over Wright’s manifesto-thumping was one of
surprise. “So, what’s their problem?” was his view of the outcry.

The idolizing cultists that make up the majority of Obama’s camp followers are
well aware of his wishful thinking about change. They know the reality of his
cloistered world view. The “change” that they are so in hopes of, coincides
with their dreams. They drool over the possibility of their long-sought
destruction of independent thinking and the resurrection of the cap-in-hand
servility of socialist conformity.

Obama has changed his “position” on almost every issue he has espoused. Obama
and his groupies harbor the patronizing conceit all too common to those on the
radical left. They, like all elitists, actually believe that the rest of us are
too stupid to see through their pettyfoggery. (With the undisguised help of the
dominant liberal medias there exists, unfortunately, a large portion of true
believers who don’t want to confront themselves with the obvious.)

As I stated above, Obama has changed his position on almost all of the issues
he has addressed. Please note that I said he has changed his “position” on
issues. That he has done. But he has not changed his mind on any
of them. When he’s dancing his jig on his past decrees his defenders like to
say he is “growing”. Malarkey! He is lying>

Whose side of the Mideast struggle for freedom from Islamic fascism? I have
never heard any the following words used by Barack on the misbehavior of
Islamists: Terrorists, murderers, tragic, vile, sinister, destructive or even
misguided. He has, however, repeatedly used these or similar epithets when
referring to Americans and in particular, Christians. Obama is a committed
believer in the teachings of Mohammed and is as accepting of Christianity as
Madeline Murray O’Hare.

Even worse than his Muslimism is Obama’s dedication to socialism. From
socialized health care to central control of private enterprise and wealth
re-distribution, Obama has run the gamut of collectivist fantasy.

Obama is nothing more than a modern day Huey Long who once said, “”I’m a
small fish here in Washington. But I’m the Kingfish to the folks down in
Louisiana.” Replace “folks down in Louisiana” with “the rest of you” and
you have Barack Obama in a nutshell.  



REAL CHANGE? OR THE STATUS QUO….by Don Bright

REAL CHANGE?
Or the Status Quo.
By Don A. Bright

My Microsoft Bookshelf dictionary defines “change” in
the following way:  Change: 1. a. To cause to be
different: b. To give a completely different form or appearance to;
transform: 

All three candidates running for the 2008 nomination for President (Barrack
Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain.) have been singing from the oldest
hymnal in the church of liberalism since the beginning of the campaign.
“We need change.” they sing. This piece of political rhetoric has
been around since voting began.  Let’s take a closer look at what is
really the status quo in the United States and what would truly “cause (our
government) to be different”.
Just so we know we’re on the same page as to “change” and “status quo” I
will add here the same dictionary’s definition of “status quo”:  status
quo: noun  The existing condition or state of affairs.
 
Currently in the United States our status quo is socialism.  (a
stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and
communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according
to work done. –
Merriam-Webster online dictionary).  “Change”, then,
would consist of a transposition from “a stage in government theory of
socialism to capitalism, distinguished by freedom, private property and equal
rights for all and pay according to productivity. –
Bright’s on demand
Common Sense Dictionary.)
 
Do any of the three candidates I have listed above truly want
change?   On a comparative test the only answer would of course be
“none of the above”.  Let’s take a look at who’s calling for what kind of
change:

Clinton:  Hillary is campaigning on promises to socialize our entire
medical system (1/6 of our economy) by putting it under the control of mindless
bureaucrats which will triple the cost and reduce the quality of the
system.  She will work to grant immunity from prosecution for such
organizations as the Black Panthers, Weather Underground, (which she championed
during the sixties) Cair, and Moveon.org.  She also promises to raise
taxes and place more and more commerce under the heavy hand of government with
further regulation and corporate taxes.  Hillary calls this change…I call
it the status quo.

Obama:  Barrack is running on promises to expand racial quotas, government
controlled wages based on racial and gender, giving gestapoist agencies of the
federal government the sole power to define individual thought through “hate”
crime legislation, remove children from parental guidance by dictate and put
the government in charge of children at birth, (read his “0 to 5” plan for
early brainwashing on the glories of government dependency) and the banning of
the Pledge of Allegiance and National Anthem.  (He turns his back on the
flag when either is in play.)  Barrack calls this change…I call it the
status quo.

McCain:  By and large, John has very socialist longings.  His disdain
for our Constitution … specifically freedom of speech (McCain-Feingold Campaign
Reform Act) and religion (he refers to religious leaders as “agents of
intolerance.”) …, his call for more government control of our property and
activities through the use of global warming scaremongering, his pursuit of
governmental designation of marital status, his pre-emption of the
congressional power to declare war and his one-worldism (elimination of nation
state sovereignty through open borders and bowing to United Nation dictates.)
are significant proof of a socialist bent.  He calls that change.  I
call it the status quo.

Ironically, true change would be returning the United States to the original
intent of the freedom-fighters – our founding heroes.  After all, it was
an escape from the policies of the three liberals above and their ilk that was
the cause – indeed, the reason – for the United States and its
enlightened revolution.
Probably the most often repeated phrase in human history is “the struggle
for
freedom”.
And that does not mean the freedom from individualism.  It means the
freedom from collectivism. In other words, the struggle has been freedom from
government and the historic record of its innate evils. 

In order to secure this enlightened thought of the proper form of government –
that of a contained government – our forefathers were intelligent enough to
realize that a historic anti-government contract between the governed and the
governing was necessary and thus the greatest document in the annals of humanity
was written; the Constitution of the United States.  Today, those of us
that still honor the incontrovertible rational of this noble document are
called “anti-government”…well duh!  I proudly wear the title of
“anti-government”.  I could name a whole list of other “anti-government”
heroes but it would take to much time and space to do so.  My suggestion,
if the reader wants a partial list of these enlightened anti-government men, is
for the reader to turn to the signers of the Constitution.

For Clinton, Obama and McCain, then, to harbor a desire for the maintaining of
our present paradigm of slavery to a megalithic despotism and call it “change”
is a grotesque abuse of the word.

In the words of the writer, Philip K. Dick “The basic tool for the manipulation
of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of
words, you can control the people who must use the words.
( “What’s a
Word Worth?
)

Don Bright is a radio talk
show host, poet and editorialist.  He can be contacted through his
website: 
Brightremarks.com .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



The 3 STOOGES for president.

The presidential race is down to the last 3 Stooges, unfortunately
not the foolish, funny movie Stooges, but the stooges for open-borders,
multiple anti-Constitutional organization puppets of the one-world dictatorship
puppeteers.

No candidate stooge differs from the other unethical,
empty-suit stooges dedicated to the demise of America. Truth is their enemy.  All except Congressman Ron Paul.

Hillary is a proven Communist, e.g. socialized national
healthcare, promising cradle to grave programs for everyone.

Obama=same, e.g. he & Hillary studied and served under
the same Communist Saul Alinsky of the “Industrial Areas Foundation” on how to
infiltrate institutions and manipulate the public into a collectivist police
state.

McCain=Neoconservative Fascist’s “eternal war for eternal peace”
insanity e.g. 100 year war on Iraq, outsourcing 
security industry, favoring one world elitist rule over all…the ultimate
Manchurian Candidate.

America, under any one of these 3 Stooges…kiss your children
goodbye into government school indoctrination centers which transform them into
the cannon fodder mandated by “national public service”, kiss goodbye our Constitution
and all your individual “antiquated” rights of yesteryear.

Unfortunately, most can’t or won’t comprehend the intent of
such stratagem…a combination of pure evil, lust for power/money, and a return
to dictatorship of the elite over the “ignorant masses”.

The 3 Stooges say “Gotcha!” 
 Patrick Henry would call them “Rapacious
Harpies”.

 Not a shot was fired,
how politically correct! Just as Soviet Dictator Khrushchev predicted.  Put on your dull grey uniform and get in the
long lines for permission to do or have anything, or go anywhere. The Founders
knew what would happen if we traded freedom for perceived security and how
right they were!

Back to the Dark Ages, thanks to the Stooge leaders and
followers.

Vote Ron Paul.

Barbara McCutchen

arkansasfreedom.net

 

 

We’ll get the president we deserve by Mary Starrett


http://www.newswithviews.com/Mary/starrett80.htm

WE’LL GET THE
PRESIDENT WE DESERVE

By Mary Starrett
January 31, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

Try
this. Ask fellow “conservatives” who our next president should be. After you
hear the candidate’s name ask: “Why?”

Nine
times out of ten, you’ll hear some mutterings like: “He’s really conservative” or
“We need a Christian in the White House” or “He’s the best qualified.” Ask for
some specifics and you’re likely to see eyes shift downward as the subject is
changed.

The
truth of the matter is, most people are woefully uninformed and are buying the
lying of ‘front-runner’ candidates and their media sock puppets.

Last
weekend at a department store, I heard two sales women mention Ron Paul. I
listened to the following comments as I poked through the sweater racks.

Woman
#1: “He’s so creepy, I just kept taking that poll online ‘til it finally showed
I was for someone else.”

Woman
#2:” I know, he’s really a weirdo. It came up for Ron Paul for me, too, but I
would never vote for him.”

For
one moment, I questioned the wisdom of women’s suffrage.

Along
with the media embargo on Congressman Ron Paul’s silver medal showing in the silver state
as well as his unprecedented fund-raising, many Americans refuse to acknowledge
the one, true constitutionalist in the GOP presidential race. Many folks twist
themselves into pretzels trying to defend candidates who do not represent them
at all on the major issues and whose track records should be cause for serious concern.

Take
the recent New York Times Story which details the
ruthlessness with which former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani dispensed with
his those who dared to cross him.

Why
was this information just now revealed? The time for this frightening expose’
of the lengths “America’s Mayor” went to in destroying those who got in his way
was when Rudy was riding high in the polls. It would have served to let people
know just whom they were considering for leader of the free world. The
gutlessness of the New York Times in sitting on this story speaks volumes about
media’s complicity in covering up the crimes of the political “chosen”. Could
it be the NYT was afraid of retribution should this man actually become
president? Was it only when it became apparent he’d soon be dropping out of the
race that they had the guts to expose him? You decide.

Add
to this information the facts that Giuliani covered for a large pharmaceutical
company while its billion dollar selling drug Oxycontin was ravaging lives all across America.

People
who supported Rudy up till the bitter end, apparently weren’t aware of, or
didn’t understand the gravity of his work with a foreign corporation, which is
currently hell-bent on taking over vast portions of America’s countryside for
use as a giant transcontinental toll road. The so-called ‘NAFTA Superhighway’
is designed to make transporting foreign goods easier for Chinese and Mexican
corporations. Mercifully, Giuliani is out of the running, but that doesn’t put
us in the clear by any means.

Some
voters will bemoan the problem of illegal immigration in one breath and in the
next breath tell you they want former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee to be
president.

Obviously,
these people have not done any homework on their candidate of choice or they
would know Huckabee created a veritable sanctuary state in Arkansas. While
governor, he courted a cheap, illegal workforce for corporate cronies at Tyson
Foods and WalMart, thus lowering the pay scale for legal residents of that
state who then found jobs harder than ever to come by.

At
the same time, Huckabee provided taxpayer-funded office space to the Mexican
government, pushed healthcare jackpots for illegals and likened the current
population of illegal aliens to slaves brought here from Africa, all the while
suggesting that those who had a problem with the onslaught might be “racist.”

Huckabee’s
presidential “immigration reform” plan is to have those here illegally go back
to their home countries for one day and then come back lickety- split all
legal-like. The so-called ‘touch-back” program is nothing less than amnesty.
This, Huckabee touts as “tough” immigration policy.

If
your fellow “conservative” should tell you he’s a Mitt Romney supporter, again,
ask him “why?” When he mutters that Mitt has what it takes to lead our country
back to a more constitutional track ask him if he has any fondness for the
provisions of the 2nd amendment. Chances are he will ask what amendment that
is. You can then remind him (or her) that it is the gun one- up there near the
top of the list.

Now
would also be a good time to remind your fellow “conservative” that while he
was governor of Massachusetts Romney presided over a state, which has among the
most restrictive gun control laws in the country. When asked about those
restrictions Romney said “We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I
support them. I won’t chip away at them; I believe they protect us and provide for our safety.”

Or
maybe you’re hearing Romney is a real ‘family values’ candidate. This would be
a good time to mention Romney’s new found ‘family’ values don’t exactly square
up with some items on his ‘to-do’ list while he was governor such as:

1)
Supporting and promoting legalizing homosexual civil unions
2) Opposing the Boy Scouts’ ban on homosexual scoutmasters
3) Refusing to endorse original Massachusetts constitutional amendment defining
marriage as between one man and one woman.

Folks
who heard Romney speak during the Michigan primary heard him say “I’ll work
every day to change Washington and bring us back, because Michigan is personal
to me.”

What
Romney neglected to add was that unconstitutional ‘free-trade’ agreements have
choked the life out of manufacturing, and given unfair advantage to foreign
corporations at the expense of our national economy. In a state beleaguered by
a 7.4% unemployment rate, this is where the ‘free trade’ rubber meets the road.
At no time did Romney discuss working to end those trade agreements.

If
the conversation turns to McCain as a viable candidate, again ask “Why?” They
might point to McCain’s honesty during the Michigan primary when he said auto
jobs weren’t coming back to the state. Sadly, McCain was right, but he didn’t
mention that he has been the only GOP candidate to say the country needs to
fight ‘global warming’ by accepting higher fuel efficiency standards- surely
the final nail in the Motor City’s coffin. Even Romney admits that would be a
bad idea, calling a bill McCain supported to require vehicle manufacturers to
improve fuel efficiency by 40 percent an “anvil” around the neck of a sinking
industry.

Starting
with the First-Amendment-busting McCain-Feingold “campaign finance” bill he
championed, John McCain essentially muzzled advocacy groups like pro-life and
pro-2nd amendment organizations, with legislation that shut down ‘issue ads’ in
the last days of political campaigns. McCain called Pat Robertson and Jerry
Falwell “agents of intolerance” comparing them to Louis
Farrakhan and Al Sharpton.

Now
you can segue into McCain’s votes on taxes. When you’re told the senator is
“fiscally conservative” mention McCain voted against President Bush’s 2001 and
2003 tax cuts.

Maybe
you’d like to throw in that McCain, the “conservative” was behind anti-gun
legislation to restrict sales at gun shows at both federal and state levels.
The pro- 2nd amendment group Gun Owners of America says:

“This year it
appears (McCain) is seeking to ‘come home’ to the pro-gun community, but the
wounds are deep
.”

Perhaps
now would be a good time to add that McCain supported amnesty legislation.

Folks
in Arizona and the rest of the country who are worried about the illegal influx
don’t think he’s so “conservative” on the issue. Roy Beck, executive director
of the anti-illegal immigration group NumbersUSA (www.numbersusa.com) had this
to say after John McCain won the New Hampshire primary:

“I
can tell you every single immigration activist and organization is terrified by
the New Hampshire results.”

According
to a recent New York Times/CBS News poll none of the
Republican candidates is viewed favorably by even half the Republican
electorate. By contrast the D’s like their lineup just fine.

Seventy-six
percent of Republicans asked said they might still change their minds on a
candidate compared with 23 percent who say their decision is firm. Among
Democrats, 59 percent said they could change their minds, and 40 percent said
they’re firm on their decision.

These
statistics are another indication of why so many life-long Republicans are
registering dissatisfaction with their party. If they wanted liberal democrats
to vote for they could choose Hillary or Obama or Edwards. Instead, holding
their nose and voting for yet another R who has abandoned the core principles
of the Grand Old Party is frankly, wearing thin.

This
election year’s unparalleled voter dissatisfaction- especially among the
Republicans can’t be ignored. With the release of the study showing the Bush
administration lied over 900 times in justifying the Iraq war
, it’s
getting harder for the pro-war set to justify the bloodletting, much less
ignore “Bomb, bomb Iran”-type statements from candidates like McCain.

Voters
who have done their homework know that Congressman Ron Paul is the only
candidate in either “big box” party who is against the unconstitutional war in
Iraq and against pre-emptive strikes against Iran.

Our
Republic will surely not survive another election at the hands of an
ill-informed electorate. That is why it is imperative we get the facts and put
principles above party politics. Should the GOP deliver anyone besides
Congressman Ron Paul, we must be ready to take the initiative and vote for a
third party candidate.

American
poet Paul Goodman summed it all up when he wrote; “The organization of American
society is an interlocking system of…an electorate notoriously unenlightened,
misled by a mass media notoriously phony”

Unenlightened
and phony…a combination that will prove deadly for our future.

For
a comprehensive overview of all the presidential candidates from a
constitutionalist standpoint click here.

©
2008 Mary Starrett – All Rights Reserved


Mary
Starrett was the Constitution Party candidate for Oregon governor in November,
2006, a TV news anchor and talk show host for 25 years and a radio talk show
host for 5 years.

Executive
Director, Oregonians for Life, Board of Directors, Christian Family Adoptions.

She
is currently the Communications Director for the Constitution Party. The Constitution
Party
is the fastest-growing minor political party (www.ballot-access.org)
and is made up of Americans who believe a return to constitutional government
is imperative.

 



McCain & Obama dedicated to our destruction


http://opensourceactivist.org/2008/02/06/bill-to-improve-health-care-in-mexico/#more-30

Bill to
improve health care…in Mexico!

February
6th, 2008 ·

The health care mess in the United States is a top concern of voters.
Too many Americans find that, despite their best efforts, they are unable to
provide quality health care for their families. Too many Americans live in fear
that an illness might leave them destitute. Too many Americans spend years
sacrificing to pay skyrocketing premiums only to discover that, when the need
arises, their policies offer protections that are next to worthless.

Most of us agree that it’s simply
not right that so many Americans, sincerely trying their best to provide for
their families, are at the mercy of a phalanx of greedy insurance companies,
medical malpractice lawyers, health care corporations, and other profiteers
that have used decades of influence in Washington to institutionalize their
chomp hold on the public jugular.

What would Americans think, then, of
a member of Congress who introduced legislation, not to improve health care in
the United States, but to improve health care in Mexico?

Insane? Drunk? Unworthy of public
office?

What would Americans think, then, of
a bill introduced in Congress that required federal agencies to come up with a
plan, not to expand health coverage in the United States, but to expand health
coverage in Mexico?

Impossible? Unthinkable? Wildly
irresponsible?

What would Americans think, then, of
the motives of a senator, who not only introduced a bill to improve Mexico’s
health care system and extend coverage to a growing population of 120 million
people, but gave health insurance companies the right to help devise the plan?

Blatantly corrupt? Grossly
indifferent to the well-being of the American people? Downright treasonous?

Unbelievable as it may seem, the
Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act of 2005 contained a provision giving
insurance companies the right to help devise a plan for extending US health
care to Mexico (Sec. 1004. BINATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH
INFRASTRUCTURE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
).

Even more unbelievable, the senator
who sponsored the bill is not on the verge of being thrown out of office for
this odious piece of legislation. No, the senator who introduced the bill,
Senator John McCain of Arizona, is on the verge of locking up the Republican
nomination to be our next president.

Damn! How come you didn’t know that before
you voted for John McCain on Tuesday, you ask?

You’ve been watching the
all-day-every-day TV news coverage of the primaries.

You’ve been reading your local
newspaper’s daily coverage of the races for the parties’ nominations.

You are an above-average-informed
voter.

You know that

  • large
    majorities of young people and black people support Barack Obama,
  • a
    majority of white women over the age of 40 support Hillary Clinton,
  • a
    majority of Christian evangelicals support Mike Huckabee,
  • John
    McCain’s Republican supporters are moderates,
  • Barack
    Obama has doubled his support among southern white males since South Carolina,
  • Mitt
    Romney has financed much of his own campaign,
  • Iowa
    is lily-white,
  • Fox
    News cable television didn’t have enough room in its studio to include
    Republican candidate Ron Paul in a debate between the Republican
    candidates it televised,
  • Republicans
    hope Hillary wins,
  • McCain
    is the only Republican who can win in November, and everyone, even
    Democrats, respects his history as a POW,
  • Rudy
    Giuliani’s strategy to skip the first few primaries and focus on Florida
    was a bad one,
  • Oprah
    Winfrey supports Barack Obama, and not just because he’s African-American,
  • Arnold
    Schwarzenegger supports John McCain, but his wife supports Barack Obama,
  • Robert
    DeNiro supports Barack Obama because Obama makes him “believe,”
  • Ron
    Paul raised a record amount of money one day a couple of months ago,
  • large
    majorities of Latinos support Hillary Clinton,
  • Mitt
    Romney unhiply riffed on “Who Let the Dogs Out,” and
  • the
    top vote-getting position for an American presidential candidate this year
    is to be for “change.”

But you didn’t know that the
only clear front-runner in the race to be our next president proposed, in the
last session of congress, a bi-national health care system to be devised by
insurance companies. To be devised by insurance companies, for crying
out loud
.

Eight years of George W. Bush, Karl
Rove, and the Wall Street Journal’s “GOP stalwart,” Jack Abramoff, have left the Republican Party in such a tattered mess
that its future is in doubt. But (and you’ll know this if you are a
well-informed voter), anti-Bush Republicans are supporting…John McCain!

I don’t know. Maybe we’re too stupid
to have a democracy.

Oh, and, by the way, all you Barack
Obama supporters—before you start feeling all superior: while no one can deny
how exceedingly important it is to elect a president who supports
change—especially one that has the ability to make Robert DeNiro believe—there
may be one characteristic Senator Obama possesses even more salient, if you can
imagine, than the incidental fact of his father’s skin color: Barack Obama
co-sponsored John McCain’s health care for Mexico legislation