Was the unconstitutional arrest of Hollis Wayne Fincher intended
to be another Ruby Ridge, Waco or the travesty of Border Patrol agents Ramos
and Campean’s trumped-up arrest and conviction.

The arraignment of Fincher so indicated: BATFE agent Wade Vittatow
spouted venom vilifying Fincher  stating
Fincher’s home was in the “boondocks”, implying 
Fincher was  hiding from federal
jackboots, then an admonition that the road was so bad leading to the Fincher
homestead that an attack on Fincher could produce casualties.

It appears Vittatow and the other 7 enforcement agencies
were set on provoking a shootout with Fincher. 
What explanation can be ascertained from 8 law enforcement agencies, one
snitch (entrapment that produced nothing) and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer
dollars to illegally snare one patriot? Judge Hendren and Congressman Boozman
stated Fincher is a patriot. Why conviction and incarceration?

The order to ensnare Fincher came from New Orleans via
dual-citizen Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

“Jury perjury” is a practice of the BATFE.  “Star Chamber” tactics were employed:  the person on trial is not allowed to present
their defense to the jury and the jury is not allowed to hear the statements of
the defendant, which is “jury tampering”.  Both unconstitutional.

Prosecutor Balfe’s response to Motion for Arrest of Judgment
failed to prove their case. Fincher was not allowed to use the 2^nd
Amendment in his defense, yet Balfe selectively used the Constitution in his Arrest
of Judgment response, citing two federal statutes he claimed were within the authority
granted to Congress by the Constitution. 
Where ? The Constitution is not subservient to Federal statutes.

Balfe’s case rested on a violation of the “Commerce Clause”,
making it incumbent on him to prove, he failed.

The Feds, like children, change the rules of the game, and
in so doing have made the Constitution irrelevant.

 

Joe McCutchen

Fort Smith

479-646-8261