|
(Please note that the
book ‘1984’ was not just some fiction writing that appears to be
coming true but the revelation of a multigenerational plan exposed by Wells
as Cuddy tells you in this important article.
“…..George
Orwellâs 1984 (published 1949) as fiction, but Orwell had been a Fabian
Socialist and was actually warning people about a planned future dictatorship
under Big Brother. ” and “Another work
most view as fiction is Aldous Huxleyâs BRAVE NEW WORLD (1932).”
Jan)
YOU WILL COME TO
LOVE BIG BROTHER
By Dennis L.
Cuddy, Ph.D.
March 10, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
[Note:
In my last article,
I indicated that the power elite at the most recent Bilderberg meeting may
have âdirected a
pullbackâ (at least
temporarily) of an attack on Iran,â given Russiaâs
and Chinaâs objections. It
would be much easier to attack Iranâs oil ally,
Venezuela, with its troublesome leader Hugo Chavez. But the U.S., couldnât
just attack Venezuela without an incident. What if U.S. ally Colombia just
happened to have an incursion into Venezuela, and Venezuela responded with
military action? The U.S. would then militarily have to come to the aid of
Colombia and oust Chavez, wouldnât it? The
question is whether anyone would be gullible enough to believe such a
scenario would happen just by accident!]
Most
people see George Orwellâs 1984 (published
1949) as fiction, but Orwell had been a Fabian Socialist and was actually
warning people about a planned future dictatorship under Big Brother. When
Big Brotherâs agent OâBrien
is torturing Winston, who eventually reluctantly submits, OâBrien
tortures him again and Winston is bewildered because he has already
submitted. However, OâBrien explains
that the goal is to have people submit not out of fear, but because they have
actually come to love Big Brother and his rule over them.
Another
work most view as fiction is Aldous Huxleyâs BRAVE NEW WORLD
(1932). However, it too was about a real future we will face. On March 20,
1962, Huxley at U.C.-Berkeley revealed there will be âscientific
dictatorships of the future.â He stated: âIf
you can get people to assent to the state of affairs in which they are
living, the state of servitude,⦠it seems to me
that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is
precisely thisâthat we are in
process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the
controlling oligarchy, who have always existed and presumably always will
exist, to get people actually to love their servitude. People can be made to
enjoy a state of affairs which by any decent standard they ought not to
enjoy. And these methods, I think, are a real refinement on the older methods
of terror, because they combine methods of terror with methods of acceptance.
Among the various other methods which one can think of, there is, for
example, the pharmacological method,⦠and the result
would be that you can imagine a euphoric which would make people thoroughly
happy even in the most abominable circumstances. I mean these things are
possible!â
Before
a single Big Brother, or the Antichrist, is in place, those who are executing
the plan of control over us are called by myself the power elite.
Historically, they include people such as John D. Rockefeller and Andrew
Carnegie. More recently, they include notables such as David Rockefeller and
international financier George Soros (head of Soros Fund Management). Iâve
already written about David Rockefellerâs admission in
his MEMOIRS (2002) that heâs part of a
secret cabal moving us toward world government. Iâve
also referred to historical power elite member (and Skull & Bones member)
William Whitneyâs plan to
contribute heavily to both major parties, and then alternate power so the
stupid public thinks itâs had a choice
when it actually doesnât. The power
elite really controls our choices.
Regarding
the 2008 presidential race, U.S. Senator (and CFR member) John McCain now has
the Republican nomination sewed up. But if McCain is a real conservative, why
is he chairman of the Reform Institute (to which ultra-liberal Senator John
Kerryâs wife also
belongs), which has received a great deal of funding from leftist George
Soros?
In
Richard Poeâs and David
Horowitzâs THE SHADOW
PARTY (2006), they describe how Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties radicals
seized control of the Democratic Party. Soros has been very close to Hillary
Clinton for a long time, but heâs also
contributed heavily to her chief Democratic presidential rival Barack Obama.
At
this point, it may be worth mentioning other interesting connections. During
Bill Clintonâs presidency,
Hillary was in charge of a large health-care task force dominated by people
connected with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). One of the RWJFâs
primary concerns is mental health services for youth. There is a new
diagnostic method (created by Zero to Three) that determines youthâs
predisposition to a mental health problem called âreduced
neuronal plasticity.â Cortex
Pharmaceuticals manufactures a new chemical compound called Ampakine, which ârestores
neuronal plasticity.â Cortexâs
largest shareholder is Quantum Partners (QP) in the Cayman Islands, and QP is
controlled by Soros Fund Management.
Both
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have acknowledged admiration for Saul
Alinsky (Clinton wrote her college senior thesis about him), who asserted in
RULES FOR RADICALS (1971) that âany revolutionary
change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude
toward change among the masses of people.â He continued to
say that the radical organizer âdedicated to
changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the
resentments of the people of a community, fan the latent hostilities of many
of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out
controversy and issuesâ¦. An organizer
must stir up dissatisfaction and discontentmentâ¦.
He knows that all values are relativeâ¦. Truth to him is
relative and changing.â Alinsky even
included an acknowledgment to Lucifer at the front of this book.
To
show how the power elite operates, Alinsky in 1940 founded the Industrial
Areas Foundation (IAF). John D. Rockefellerâs Rockefeller
Foundation and Andrew Carnegieâs Carnegie
Corporation have given a great deal of money to these IAF, which works with
organizations, schools, and in churches in most states of the U.S. and uses
the Alinsky Method (otherwise called the Delphi Technique) to accomplish its
objectives. This method uses facilitators asking questions designed to push
for consensus toward outcomes designed or predetermined by the facilitators.
Whatâs
all this got to do with the power eliteâs global
objectives? The Alinsky Method has been used to promote school-to-work
programs. âEngaging the
Public: One Way to Organizeâ is a Concept
Paper produced by the IAF for the National Alliance for Restructuring
Education. And in this document, one reads that âschools
face the challenges of preparing students for a labor market in an economy
that is increasingly mobile in nature, and requires of its workers the
ability⦠to be âlifelong
learnersâ.â
The IAF holds meetings âdesigned to
enable individuals to develop an awareness of their interdependency with
others.â In other words,
workers are being prepared to work in an interdependent global economy.
Notice
how the power elite often stays one step removed from the entities executing
their plan. This is to hide their involvement and deflect any public ire or
blame.
Another
area in which this is evident is the oil industry. Before Dick Cheney became
Vice-President he was head of Halliburton. Addressing the CFR some time ago,
he said âitâs
good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations. Iâve
been a member for a long time and was actually director for some period of
time. I never mentioned that when I was campaigning for re-election back home
in Wyoming.â In other words,
keep hidden from the people of his state that heâs
a member of the CFR. Following his statement, CFR members in attendance
laughed knowingly.
During
his leadership of Halliburton, Cheney forecasted that gasoline prices would
rise to above $2.00 per gallon. This seemed unbelievably high at that time,
but proved extremely accurate. How would Cheney know what was going to
happen? Itâs because the
rise in oil prices was manufactured by the power elite. However, in order to
keep this hidden and divert blame, the power elite used the following
strategy.
Their
foundations heavily subsidized the environmental movement, which pressured
federal, state and local governments to enact stringent rules and regulations
that resulted in restrictions on the construction of oil refineries. In my
February 6, 2006 NewsWithViews column titled âMental Health,
Education and Social Control, Part 25,â I noted that âthe
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights has on its website internal memos
from Chevron, Mobil and Texaco years ago showing their desire to limit oil
refining in order to increase prices.â
Not
only does the lack of construction of any new oil refineries increase the
price of gasoline, but the lack of any increased refinery capacity allows oil
reserves to remain in the ground longer, thus insuring even higher prices for
it later. In addition, environmentally imposed regulations also add to the
cost of producing anything, thus providing an incentive to any company to
move overseas wherever (e.g., China) such regulations donât
exist. This also is part of the power eliteâs plan. And who
gets the blame? Itâs the
environmentalists, not the hidden power elite who planned it.
The
power elite also uses coercive tactics in which the people actually consent
to their power grab. For example, the power elite planned the TransTexas
Corridor (TTC) as part of a TransAmerican Superhighway to connect the U.S.,
Canada, and Mexico in a North American Union. Obviously, the people of
Oklahoma have objected to the TTC coming into their state, so what will the
power elite do? Author Jerome Corsi has suggested they might have the Federal
Highway Administration threaten to withhold federal highway funds from
Oklahoma unless they consent. Because of Americansâ
great dependency on the federal highway system for transporting people, food,
building supplies, etc., the elected Oklahoma legislature will probably
reluctantly consent.
I
believe if the public in general complains about this tactic, they will be
reminded that they have already consented to it in principle when their
elected members of Congress passed No Child Left Behind. This federal law
requires each state to submit its education plan to the federal U.S.
Secretary of Education for approval before the state can receive federal
education funds under this legislation. Because state governments greatly
desire these funds, most states have consented to submit their plans for
approval.
In
other words, the people âhave come to love
Big Brother,â just as Big
Brotherâs agent OâBrien
said they would in George Orwellâs 1984.
As
Iâve written many times before, the
power eliteâs plan is to
bring about a World Socialist Government, and in my books I have reproduced a
1911 cartoon showing Rockefeller, Carnegie, etc. welcoming Karl Marx and his âSocialismâ
to Wall Street. Todayâs upper class in
the U.S. is furthering this process by sending their children to universities
such as Duke, known as the Ivy League school of the South.
Duke
students are primarily the sons and daughters of oil, banking, insurance,
etc., executives and Duke is very proud of the number of Marxist professors
there. In Accuracy in Academiaâs April 1987
CAMPUS REPORT, one reads: âDr. Malcolm
Gillis, vice-provost of Duke University, thanked some 100 Marxist professors,
graduate students and activists for gathering at Duke on March 13-15. Dr.
Gillis said that by holding the Southeast Marxist Scholars Conference there,
they were âhelping us to
increase the visibility of Marxist programs on this campus.â
Gillis said, âWhen I left this
campus 20 years ago, there were very few Marxists here. When I returned in
1984, I saw Marxists in many parts of the social science faculty.ââ¦
Professor Allen Zagarell, professor of anthropology at Duke, organized the
conference. Professor Zagarell refused to confirm or deny that he is the Al
Zagarell who is the brother of Mike Zagarell, editor of the PEOPLEâS
DAILY WORLD, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, U.S.Aâ¦.
In a (conference) seminar on Marxism and religion, Toby Terrar of the
National Lawyers Guild declared, âthe United States
is the enemy.ââ
Many
people today look at this type of Marxist influence on society as coming from
the Frankfurt School. While that is true, itâs important to
remember that itâs the elite who
conceptualized Marxism in order to develop a dialectical process with
capitalism in order to achieve a World Socialist Government. Karl Marx was
taught the collectivist socialism of Saint-Simon by Marxâs
father-in-law Ludwig von Westphalen, and Marx was actually paid by the League
of the Just to write the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. The League was not comprised of
poor workers but rather the intellectual and some business elites who were
descendants of the Illuminati vision of Weishaupt, Goethe, Pestalozzi, etc.
They saw themselves as the new âphilosopher
kings,â who would rule
over the masses.
At
the beginning of the 20th century, the business elite teamed with the
intellectual elite in the field of education to pursue their dream. John D.
Rockefeller hired Baptist minister Frederick Gates to direct Rockefellerâs
General Education Board, Rockefeller Foundation, International Health Board,
and to be chairman of the board of trustees of the Rockefeller Institute for
Medical Research (involved in eugenics). The year after the 1911 cartoon I
mentioned earlier, Gates authored âThe Country
School of To-morrowâ (THE WORLDâS
WORK, August 1912), in which he revealed the eliteâs
plan by writing: âIn our dream, we
have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect
docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from
our minds; and, unfettered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a
grateful and responsive rural folk.â In other words,
these people âwill come to love
Big Brother.â
©
2008 Dennis Cuddy – All Rights Reserved
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst,
received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major
in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the
university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an
international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S.
Department of Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf
of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty
books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in
newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles
Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in
various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has
also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS’s
Nightwatch.
E-Mail: Not Available
|