Category Archives: False history

Education Morass, False history

The IMMENSE POWER OF PROPAGANDA

Leave a comment

The Problem With Lincoln

By Thomas DiLorenzo on Jun 29, 2020

“The problem with Lincoln is the problem with America,” said my friend Clyde Wilson when I asked him for a blurb for my new book, The Problem with Lincoln (Regnery, 2020).  That in fact is the theme of the book, written seventeen years after my first book on the subject, The Real Lincoln (TRL), as I shall explain.  A secondary theme comes from something that an academic reviewer of The Real Lincoln wrote at the end of his review seventeen years ago:  “Lincoln was even worse” than I portrayed him as being. 

How was Lincoln “worse”; let us count the ways.  Lincoln was in fact an even more extreme racist and white supremacist (a typical man of the North, in other words) than I argued in TRL.  This speaks volumes not just of Lincoln but of the Lincoln cult in academe that has covered up these truths for generations.  In The Problem with Lincoln I document page after page of his own statements and declarations demonstrating this point, something that should inspire the current crop of left-wing “protesters,” arsonists, and vandals to begin dismantling all the Lincoln statues that scar the land. 

For generations, the Lincoln cult has attempted to cover these plain historical facts up by saying that slick old Abe was simply pandering to the pervasively-racist white Northern electorate when he opposed making citizens of black people, or allowing them to intermarry with whites, and to deport them to Africa, Central America — anywhere but the U.S.  “Honest Abe” was obsessively lying through his teeth his entire adult life, in other words.  That is their defense. 

This argument was discredited forever with the publication of the book Colonization After Emancipation by Phil Magness and Sebastian Page, in which they prove that Lincoln was plotting with William Seward until his dying day to deport all black people, including the soon-to-be-freed-slaves, to various locations in the tropics and in Africa.  These authors uncovered correspondence between Lincoln and various foreign governments regarding the purchase of land for the deported black people from America that dates almost to the day of the assassination.  I tell the story in my new book.   

Magness and Page also debunk the Lincoln cult’s century-old tale that Lincoln suddenly gave up on his lifelong advocacy of “colonization” (a.k.a. deportation) in 1863.  Lincoln made racist and white supremacist statements all through his life, whether he was running for political office or not because they were his true beliefs. He was “a man of his times,” as the saying goes, and anything but the racial saint that the Lincoln cult has falsely portrayed him as being.

The Problem with Lincoln goes much further than TRL in showing that the War to Prevent Southern Independence, like all wars in human history, was primarily about money and political power, not humanitarianism.  All of the corruption of the British empire with its corporate welfare subsidies, protectionist tariffs (“protecting” consumers from lower prices, as John C. Calhoun once remarked), a corrupt, politicized national banking system, and the vast waste of blood and treasure on imperialistic wars was the result of Lincoln’s Americanized version of the French Revolution.  That, in fact, was always the dream of the “nationalist” tradition in American politics, beginning with Hamilton and the Yankee Federalists.

Comparing the first inaugural addresses of Jefferson Davis and Abraham Lincoln, I think I prove conclusively that both men knew – and stated publicly for all the world to hear – that there would likely be a war over tax collection if the South refused to continue to pay a tariff tribute to Washington, D.C.  Of course, the South would not do so any more than the American colonists wanted to continue to pay taxes to King George III.  In his first inaugural address Lincoln essentially drew a line in the sand and effectively said:  Pay up or die. “There needs to be no invasion of any state,” he said, as long as Southerners continued to be good little obedient taxpaying serfs to Washington, D.C.   It was basically a colossal act of Mafia-style extortion a million times worse than anything the largest criminal gang in the world has even dreamed of doing.  I say this as a student of Murray Rothbard, who once pointed out that states that behave in such a manner are little different in their purpose than any criminal gang; the only difference is that it is a much, much bigger and better-armed criminal gang. 

Lincoln and the Republican Party obviously committed treason by invading the free and independent states of the South.  That is, if one defines treason as the U.S. Constitution does, as “levying war upon the United States” or “giving Aid and Comfort to their Enemies” (Article 3, Section 3).  “United States” is in the plural here, as it is on all the founding documents, indicating the individual states, not something called “the United States government in Washington, D.C.”  I show how Lincoln behaved like a tyrannical dictator when he took it upon himself to redefine treason to mean any criticism of himself and his policies, and to have the military arrest and imprison thousands of Northern critics.  This was what George Washington called “usurpation” of the Constitution in his Farewell Address, something that he believed could destroy the Constitution itself and render it meaningless.  That of course is what Lincoln did, along with destroying the voluntary union of the founders and replacing it with a coerced union held together by extreme violence, much more like the old Soviet union than the original American union. 

To this day, we hear the ignorant voices at places like National Review making the perverted Lincoln argument about treasonous Southerners with their never-ending displays of hatred for the South of past generations as well as the current one.   It really is a sickness, fueled by the mumbo jumbo of faux “scholars” associated with “the Straussian school” of political rhetoric, a school that I make quite a few choice comments about in The Problem with Lincoln.

The Problem with Lincoln also goes much further than TRL in showing what a savage psychopath Lincoln was in waging total war against people who he claimed to be his own fellow American citizens.  I make use of the work of Brian Cisco and several “mainstream” writers on the subject whose facts I invoke without including their voluminous excuses, rationales, and lies and diversions about the subject.  Reading “mainstream” books about Lincoln’s war is like reading a compendium of legal defense briefs for The War Crimes Trial of Abraham Lincoln.   My writings drive the Lincoln cult so mad because I state the historical facts without the “spin” of lies and deceptions that they have spent generations cultivating.

After TRL was published there were several good books that appeared on how the West ended slavery peacefully, especially one by Jim Powell entitled Greatest Emancipations.  Hardly any Americans know a single thing about this – that the whole world, including the Northern states in the U.S., ended slavery peacefully without a major “war of emancipation” or of any other kind.  They falsely believe that a war that led to the death of as many as 850,000 Americans, according to the latest forensic research, was necessary to end slavery.  I call this Lincoln’s biggest failure. 

All state power is based on an avalanche of lies about the morality, superiority, grandiosity, and wisdom of the state, and the alleged failures, dangers, and evil of individual freedom, the civil society, private property, decentralization, and constitutionalism.  Throughout the book I discuss how “Honest Abe” was no different from so many other tyrants, in that he was a skilled liar, conniver, and manipulator, the three defining traits of a “master politician” according to the late Murray Rothbard.  I also demonstrate how the academic Lincoln cult has really done little more over the past 150 years than amplify and expand upon Lincoln’s lying ways, so much so that it is virtually impossible for the average citizen to known anything about the real Lincoln.

Other interesting research that emerged since the publication of TRL has to do with documentation about how Lincoln was arguably the most hated and reviled of all American presidents during his own lifetime.  (See The Unpopular Mr. Lincoln by Larry Tagg).  And not by the South but by the North.  I tell the story of how this hated and despised machine politician from Illinois was turned into a secular saint by the Republican Party propaganda machine (with significant help from the hyper-politicized New England clergy of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries).

The book includes ten appendices of primary documents that your Average American “educated” in government schools has probably never seen or even heard of:  The Crittenden-Johnson Resolution (a.k.a. War Aims Resolution) that denied the war was being fought over slavery; Lincoln’s letter to Horace Greeley in which he says the same thing; Jefferson Davis’ first inaugural address; Abraham Lincoln’s first inaugural address; the constitutional ratification documents of New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia, which declare the right to reclaim the powers delegated to the federal government should it fail to promote their happiness; the Corwin Amendment, promoted by Lincoln, that would have prohibited the federal government from ever interfering with Southern slavery; and the Emancipation Proclamation, with the sections highlighted where it says that it only applies to Confederate territory where it was, by definition, not possible for anyone to be emancipated by the U.S. government.

My hope is that at least some readers of The Problem with Lincoln will have thoughts of doing what Brion McClanahan suggests in his blurb for the book, and visit the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. not with Bibles, prayer rugs, or rosary beads in their hands, but “with sledgehammers.” 

Cultural Marxism destroying United States, False history, Globalization, Political Correctness - The Destroyer

1984 IS FINALLY HERE!

Leave a comment

July 16, 2020

This encounter with Black Lives Matter is not a fight to abolish racism, it’s a fight to abolish our existing culture, i.e. Western Civilization (including Law & Order) through fear, brute force, and raw violence.

Our government not acting in a proscribed manner simply means that they are complicit.

A friend offered these cogent words: “What we are noticing is the overthrow of free speech, most intensively through Google & Utube, both Jewish organs.  The ADL & SPLC are their managers”.

And I thought a protest was a peaceful group appearing before an appropriate body to rationally air their concerns about a specific issue, so says the First Amendment, in part “abridging the freedom of speech”, “the right of the people to peacefully assemble”, and to “petition the government for a redress of grievances”. 

The Bill of Rights has not been modified. It stands as written in 1791 and first ratified by Virginia on Dec. 15, 1791.

The uncivil/unlawful conduct of Blacks, strewn with Whites, must not be tolerated by the people or it’s governmental representatives.

When Black Lives Matter made their presence known I thought Blacks & Democrats (same) were pushing legislation that would bestow more unearned largesse to the hands of Blacks.  No not so! The stakes are far greater. It comes to pass they are emboldened to overthrow the U.S. national government. Surely you jest, no not for one minute. Cities, states and the federal government apparently have ceded their legislative powers, to whom remains to be seen. Huge corporations, professional athletic unions, Hollywood and billionaires like Elon Musk (builder of a rocket carrying 2 American astronauts now positioned on a planer_, Oprah Winfrey & others who made their money under Capitalism not Communism, etc. are funding the marauders who have launched a full frontal assault against our elected/appointed governments and law-abiding citizens,

Murder, thievery, arson, rape, destruction while laying claim to whole sections of cities, and destroying & removing our roadmap of history along with antiquities that cannot be replaced, while making the demonic/idiotic demand to defund the police, leaving the law-abiding citizens defenseless.

At this point our governments have betrayed our peace-loving population, while the BLM is bent on destroying civil society and Western Culture.  Most of the while citizens are no shows, waiting perhaps for November?

Strangely, I hear few protestations from we the people, why?  The simple answer indicates ignorance, intimidation/fear, and/or cowardice.  Our once vaunted Republic has become a citadel of Cultural Marxism. Meritocracy in our institutions of learning has dissipated, and can be explained in numerous ways—mass immigration of 3rd World nationals which makes our republic no more than a 3rd World dumping ground, all the while reducing citizens to the egalitarian status (the lowest common denominator).. The above coupled to the long presence of the Frankfort School which gave us political correctness—more effective than a surgeon’s scalpel.

The Frankfort School touched American soil in the 1930’s and immediately began to implement their destructive system. They understood that America could not be taken by force, therefore they cleverly understood the road to success was a philosophical “march through the institutions” with indoctrination which resulted in a magnificent success which has reduced Americans to mental automatons. Political Correctness and mass immigration has given us a scrambled population with no way of maintaining the growing multicultural miasma which will not and cannot be maintained.

Some of the major players in the Frankfort School’s ride to victory are German Jews, Horkheimer, Adorno, Frum, Marcuse, etc. It must be said here that Jews were responsible for the fascist Hate Crime legislation which as stated above nullified major parts of our language and will continue to do so.

Jews organize, fund, and sponsor minority non-white organizations that divide and set minorities against Whites, e.g. NAACP, Core, SNCC, La Raza (the race), Maldef, Mecha, CAIR.

Interwoven into our subject matter points out that Republican Senators James Lankford (OK), and Mike Lee (UT) have introduced legislation to bring in hundreds of thousands more foreign nationals to take American jobs.  In times of 40 million Americans jobless and the Corona virus and already 25-30 million illegal aliens nesting in our republic.  I count these two no more than traitors.

The Cultural Marxists of the Frankfort School (Communists) and the Global Elite controlled Deep State are winning the eternal war of the Collectivism vs. individualism…of tyranny vs. freedom. The lights of liberty are going out all over the world, most importantly the USA.

Ladies and Gentlemen, 1984 is here.  The “Ministry of Truth”, e.g. the Smithsonian, all public education, universities, media, entertainment, et al are erasing and rewriting history as we watch the censoring of what made Western Civilization the finest ever devised by man.

Pity the young.

Joe McCutchen

Arkansasfreedom.com  

Education Morass, False history

WHY WE KEEP FIGHTING

Leave a comment

“To the soldiers of the Southern Confederacy who died to repel an unconstitutional invasion, to protect the rights reserved to the people, to perpetuate forever the sovereignty of the states.” A tribute to the Confederate soldier written on a monument somewhere in the South

I cannot count the number of times over the years I have been criticized, cursed, and ridiculed for continuing to fight the “lost cause” of my Confederate ancestors. The wording on the Confederate monument mentioned above states in a most concise manner what the soldier of the South was willing to die for and it certainly was not for the perpetuation of chattel slavery.

Had those 7 states of the South who had voted to secede by the time Lincoln was inaugurated in March of 1861 seceded simply to continue slavery, all they would have had to do was to cancel their papers of secession and rejoin the Union for Lincoln had worked behind the scenes to arrange for a proposed amendment to the Constitution called the Corwin amendment. Said amendment would have made chattel slavery legal in perpetuity and outside the powers of Congress. Here is the wording of that amendment which had already been sent to the states for ratification.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

Lincoln’s support of this amendment can be found in Lincoln’s first inaugural address here. To wit:

“I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution–which amendment, however, I have not seen–has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service. To avoid misconstruction of what I have said, I depart from my purpose not to speak of particular amendments so far as to say that, holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”

Lincoln patently lied when he stated he had not seen the Corwin amendment, if fact it was William Seward who had been instructed by Lincoln himself to not only get the Corwin amendment written and ratified but to also get a federal law passed to repeal the personal Liberty laws of several Northern states which had been written to oppose the Fugitive Slave laws.*

Lies and treachery have been the parents of war throughout history. With the possible exception of the Revolutionary war, that has certainly been the case in every war in this country’s history. Lies and treachery by Lincoln and Stanton brought about the bombardment of Fort Sumter; lies about the sinking of the USS Maine was used to promote the Spanish-American war; lies about German soldiers bayoneting babies was used to promote the First World War; documents created by British agents and given to FDR were used to promote a war against Germany along with FDR keeping secret, even from the commanders at Pearl Harbor, the imminent attack by Japan on our forces there; there were the lies and propaganda that was the Gulf of Tonkin incident that lead to the debacle that was Vietnam; the false stories about babies being thrown from incubators in Kuwait was used to promote the First Desert Storm; the false and misleading stories of “weapons of mass destruction,” Saddam’s involvement in the events of 9/11, and yellow cake uranium led to the most horrific foreign affairs mistakes in the Middle East. Posted on Author michael.d.gaddy@gmail.com

False history, U.S. Constitution

Little Known Founders & Why

1 Comment

FOUNDERS SELDOM HEARD—AND WHY.

The vast majority of Americans have been taught by the Public Fool System, Leviathan’s historians and religious con-artists, that a group of devoutly religious men, the majority of whom were in total agreement on the tenets of government, got together in 1787 and came up with a constitution that was widely accepted and is exactly what our politicians, judges and law enforcement observe today as they go about their business.

We all have heard of James Madison who bears the title of “Father of the Constitution.” Strange indeed considering the plan of government Madison wrote and transmitted to George Washington in April of 1787 and was presented at the convention as the “Virginia Plan,” was overwhelmingly rejected at that convention. Perhaps Madison deserves the title because the proposal he wrote is almost exactly the form of government we live under today. A system of government where the central government is supreme over all and the States have been relegated to “mere corporations” with little to no say so in the conduct of the central government.
So, who were these virtually unknown founders and what did they have to say about what the constitution, if ratified, would lead to in our country? And more importantly were they correct in their predictions?

First, let us take a look at George Bryan of Pennsylvania. Is he a person that any high school graduate would be able to expound upon as a founder of our country? Would he/she even recognize the name? How many adults do you know who recognize this man? Considering he said the following might be why he is not popularly quoted.

“It is the opinion of the greatest writers, that a very extensive country cannot be governed on democratical principles, on any other plan, than a confederation of very small republics, possessing all the powers of internal government, but united in the management of their foreign and general concerns. It would not be difficult to prove, that anything short of despotism could not bind so great a country under one government; and whatever plan you might, at first setting out, establish, it would issue in a despotism.”

Please remember; the “extensive country” spoken of by George Bryan was only 13 States at the time of his statement. Now, who was correct, Bryan or Madison about what kind of government would issue from our Constitution? Who is more widely known?

Was George Bryan alone in his visionary outlook? Certainly not; he was joined by many more of our “founders” you have possibly never heard about.
There was of course John Dickinson of Delaware. Dickinson had this to say on the subject.

“We cannot have a limited monarchy…our situation will not allow it—Repubs. [Republics] are for awhile industrious but finally destroy themselves—they were badly constituted—I dread a consolidation of the States.”

Considering the passive acceptance of signing statements, executive orders and the prosecution of unconstitutional wars, who could deny that we have a full blown monarchy—not just a limited one? Certainly our early Republic was “industrious” until Abraham Lincoln, operating under the powers of a Monarch, completely discarding the Constitution along the way, destroyed the principles of consent of the governed and definitely instituted a “consolidation of the States” with bullets, cannons and bayonets.

So, we have Bryan and Dickinson—were they alone in their predictions?

I’m sure almost everyone is familiar with Theophilus Parsons of Massachusetts. Certainly he is mentioned right along with the Nationalists Madison and Hamilton. Parsons stated:

“Any law…of the United States, for securing to Congress more than a concurrent right with each state is usurpation and void.” ~1788
Wow. Is there any wonder we don’t hear men like Theophilus quoted in political debates, or cited in a Supreme Court ruling?

The above were joined in their political beliefs by none other than Archibald Maclaine of North Carolina, who stated in his state’s ratification convention:
“If the gentleman will attend, he will see this is a government for confederated states; that, consequently, it can never intemeddle where no power is given.” ~1788

Hmmm—try telling this to the Director of the BLM or those who implemented Obamacare!

What about the words of the very well known and often quoted in today’s political landscape, William Richardson Davie, also of North Carolina?

“If there were any seeds in this Constitution which might, one day, produce a consolidation [of the States] it would, sir, with me, be an insuperable objection, I am so perfectly convinced that so extensive a country as this can never be managed by one consolidated government…if the state governments vanish, the general government must vanish also…the state governments can put a veto, at any time, on the general government, by ceasing to continue the executive power.” ~1788
Well, again, Abraham Lincoln certainly destroyed this concept. Ever wonder why the Republican Party refers to themselves as the “Party of Lincoln?” They sure as hell can’t claim to be that and claim to support our Constitution at the same time!

Let’s move along to another well known authority on constitutional intent and what it would become in the future. You are right—-none other than the man mentioned by all candidates for public office and state and federal judges— Rawlins Lowndes of South Carolina, also in 1788:

“The Treaty of Peace [Treaty of Paris 1783] expressly agreed to acknowledge us as free, sovereign, and independent states, which privileges we lived at present in the exercise of. But this new constitution at once swept those privileges away, being sovereign over all; so that this state would dwindle into a mere skeleton of what it was; its legislative powers would be pared down to little more than those now vested in a corporation; and he would value the honor of a seat of the legislature no higher esteem than a seat in the city council.”

Could it be this country honors the wrong Lincoln? Perhaps we need a political party of Lincoln—founder James Lincoln of South Carolina—who said:
“What does this proposed Constitution do? It changes, totally changes, the form of your present government. What have you been contending for these ten years past? Liberty! What is Liberty? The power of governing yourselves. If you adopt this Constitution have you this power? No: you give it into the hands of a set of men who live one thousand miles distant from you. Let the people but once trust their liberties out of their own hands, and what would be the consequence? First, a haughty, imperious aristocracy; and ultimately a tyrannical monarchy.”

Then, of course, there is John Lansing of New York; who, along with Robert Yates, walked out of the Philadelphia Convention because they felt the convention was exceeding the powers that had been granted to them by the people of New York. Wow—what a display of integrity. Perhaps that is why neither one of these men is widely quoted today—either by court historians or the general public. Here is what Lansing had to say about the proposed constitution at the New York State Ratification Convention. Was he right?
“Sir, if you do not give the states the power to protect themselves, if you leave them no
other check upon Congress than the power of appointing Senators, they will certainly be overcome.” (Note: the not properly amended 17th Amendment took away that check too.)

Edmund Pendleton of Virginia would state during his state’s ratification debates, while agreeing with Patrick Henry, the following:

“If this be such a government [consolidated] I will confess, with my worthy friend [Henry] that it is inadmissible over such a territory as this country. Let us consider whether it be such a government or not. I should understand a consolidated government to be that which would have the sole and exclusive power, legislative, executive and judicial without any limitation. Is this such a government? Or can it be changed to such a one? It only extends to the general purposes of the Union. It does not intermeddle with the local particular affairs of the state.”

What we have in our country today is what Edmund Randolph described in the above—a completely consolidated government that claims “sole and exclusive power, legislative, executive and judicial, without any limitation.” That is not the government that was promised to those who ratified the Constitution in 1787-88!
It is the government of Alexander Hamilton, James Wilson, John Jay, Joseph Story, Daniel Webster, Abraham Lincoln, FDR, Lyndon Johnson, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, George W Bush, Barack Obama, the US Supreme Court, federal and state judges, the law enforcement community and everyone who is running for president from both political parties in 2016.

Could it be that is why the names in the above paragraph are recognized by almost everyone, but the names of Bryant, Dickinson, Lowndes, Davie, Parsons, Lansing, Pendleton and James Lincoln are virtually unknown today—especially among politicians, educators, judges and the population as a whole?

The powers of today’s government are stolen powers, taken from the States and the people, and have led to the current state of affairs in our country. We are beyond broke; presidents use unconstitutional powers of the monarch; congress has laid down like a scared puppy, wetting the floor at the feet of the military/industrial/banking complex; our children and grandchildren are taught the laws of the tyrant are sacrosanct; the culture that founded this country is ridiculed and demonized and our government has taken on the mantle of a religion to the masses.

This was not the form of government that was ratified by the founders most have never heard of. Believe me—the fact you don’t know who they are and what they said is no accident.

IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY

MG

Cultural Marxism destroying United States, False history, Political Correctness - The Destroyer

Editorial lies about “Civil War” foment violence & destroy our Constitutional liberties.

Leave a comment

To Greg Harton: Regarding todays editorial “Enslaved by the Past” in the Ardemgaz

Only one of your quotes (if you are indeed the writer) is necessary to expose and offer irrefutable evidence that your piece is one of lies, ignorance, or both. “That is our nation’s greatest shame, and Confederates fought to destroy the government established by the U.S. Constitution we so revere today.”

At the Treaty of Paris of 1783, King George III in his signing the Surrender Accords each state was awarded one of his signed accords stating that each of the colonies was a sovereign nation, and so held by the Founding Fathers.

Pertaining to secession, in the case the second one, erroneously called the Civil War, please read the Declaration of Independence and what it has to say re secession and the definition of a Civil War is when two bodies clash to take charge of the central government. The South had no such intention, they just wanted out of Lincoln’s tariff corruption and tyrannical issues.

“He, Lincoln instructed Seward to introduce proposals in the Senate Committee of Thirteen without indicating they came from Springfield. The first resolved that the Constitution should never be altered so as to authorize Congress to abolish or interfere with slavery in the states. Another recommendation that he instructed Seward to get through congress was that all state personal liberty laws in opposition to the Fugitive Slave Law be repealed.” (Doris Kearns-Goodwin)

This proves that the war had nothing to do with slavery, all about Lincoln’s tariffs and the South funding his government well over 70%.
Lincoln & The Corwin Amendment, available in the records of the U.S. House of Representatives, the 106th Congress, Second session, the Constitution of the United States of America, Doc. No. 106-214—slavery in perpetuity.

Individuals such as you are the ilk that is fomenting uncivilized behavior in our Republic. Editorials such as yours are tearing our country apart and you are complicit in the demise of the Constitution you claim to revere!

Slavery was on its way out, rightfully so, due to economics and abolitionist activities in a peaceful manner, there was no need for Lincoln to murder 700,000 during the war and the murder, rape & theft during “reconstruction” and the continuing of same by Grant, Sherman and Sheridan directed at a genocide of Western American Indian tribes.

If you are interested in in-depth documentable truth concerning the Constitution, what lay behind it and the Uncivil War, please contact a scholar named Michael Gaddy at montezumaconstitution@gmail.com

This is not intended as a letter to the editor, but if you want to print it, please do.

Joe McCutchen
Fort Smith
August 20, 2017
arkansasfreedom.net

False history, Federal Government, one world order dictatorship

Who owns you? (Rothschild Banking History)

Leave a comment

From: Michael Gaddy [mailto:montezumaconstitution@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 12:46 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: NEW RANT POSTED

www.rebelmadman.com/?p=658

WHO OWNS YOU??? (Part one)

Freedom and Liberty are words with different meanings to many; I suppose we could see, like beauty, freedom and liberty are in the eyes of the beholder. Millions sing along with the lyric “land of the free and home of the brave” even though we currently reside in a country where the masses are more enslaved economically than at any other time in history. We also hear repeatedly that our military is fighting for our freedoms, yet with the past 16 years of continuous warfare, conducted by our military, personal freedoms have evaporated at a rate never before seen in the history of this country.

The country promised by those of our founders known as the Federalists ended and the government predicted by our founders known as the Anti-federalists began on that fateful day of April 9, 1865 at a place known to history as Appomattox Court House. Then and there we all became economic and physical slaves on that great nationalist plantation known as the American Empire, for that is the day our country and its people became the property of the international bankers and their bought and paid for minions known as government employees.

“The funding systems are always based on public debts, for the purpose of transferring the control of the government into the hands of the bondholders as security for their obligations.

Whilst the funding systems last, the government is administered in the interest of the bondholders, who control its legislation. Every independent government is jealous of the rival power of those monied oligarchies, which dethrone monarchies and destroy governments by the transfer of the debt to strangers, who thereby secure a powerful and dangerous influence in the government and work its destruction.” Crimes of the Civil War and the Curse of the Funding System by Henry Clay Dean, published in 1867.

In April of 1865, America, because of its great indebtedness to the international banking cartel, debt incurred to prosecute a war, was no longer the home of freedom or liberty. Few are those who know, or even care for that matter, that the bankers of Europe financed both sides of the war history mistakenly calls the Civil War.

Why would anyone finance both sides in a war you might ask; the answer is obvious: regardless of who wins, the victors and the vanquished become the property of those who hold that debt. In this case, as in every war since, the owners are those known simply as the international banking cartel. Those same folks who own you, your home, your business and all the property you call your own. The only thing they cannot own is your soul, unless you become a worshiper of the entity known as government.

You really don’t have to openly worship government itself as long as government employees are viewed as entities worthy of praise and adoration in your eyes. Just ask yourself: who gathers more of your attention, those who teach the tenets of freedom and liberty or politicians and other “public servants?” If government owns and controls them, by default it owns and controls you.

In order to survey the country the international bankers sought to control, in 1859 they sent one of their own to America to survey the political and economic landscape in order to devise a plan to place this country into total subservience by miring it in oppressive debt which can logically and physically never be repaid.

Remember, the founder of the Bank of London, one William Paterson, said in 1694, “The bank hath benefit of interest on all monies it creates out of nothing.”

The person who came to this country in 1859 was the 24 year-old son of James Mayer de Rothschild, Salomon James de Rothschild, sent by his father to “help advance the families banking interests.” And help those banking interests he did; within 6 short years those banking interests owned this country and its government and continue to this day to do so.

Salomon James kept his family informed of his progress in several letters which described in detail current events occurring in America and how those events could be manipulated in order to gain control of the vast resources our country contained.

Salomon James de Rothschild saw through the character of Abraham Lincoln and also saw the true cause that was bringing this country to the brink of war—and it was not slavery. Lets look at Salomon James’ own words in a letter of Sunday, June 23, 1861:
“Now the struggle has been entered into between the North and the South, a struggle of giants, or rather of boule-dogues, in which no one will yield, and where-in, after months and perhaps years of implacable combat, the two sides will find themselves back at the very place from which started, both of them weakened, with their resources exhausted, their country ruined, and with the best of their blood sacrificed, and with no other result obtained than deepening the abyss between them…

I’ll come back later to the slavery question, which was the first pretext for secession, but which was just a pretext and is now secondary. The true reason which impelled the Southern states to secede is the question of tariffs. The South is simply a producer and consumer; the West and the North, and especially the East are most entirely manufacturers, but they need strong protection. The South could supply itself with all necessary items in Europe, at prices from twenty-five to forty percent lower than they have been paying up to now. It [the South] contends that these duties do it no good and that the money goes back into the pockets of the Northern manufacturers. Therefore it wants to escape from this tax. The suppression of , or even a strong reduction in, these duties would completely ruin the eastern states of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which could not compete with the cheap prices attained by England and even France. Thousands of men would find themselves unemployed and would therefore threaten the well-being and even the very existence of not only of their employers, but even of the merchants and producers in those areas, leading to an imminent danger of social revolution, which the North must avoid at all costs.

The question of tariffs has been discussed in the deliberative assemblies for more than twenty years, and despite the efforts of the South, despite the majority which its supporters in the North gave it, the country has leaned more toward protectionism than toward free trade. Since a Republican president was elected, the South felt its cause was lost, that the encroachments on its principles would become greater and greater each day under the protection of the federal government. It therefore preferred to fight at once rather than be paralyzed by the measures of the president.”

Here, in the words of an observer who sought only to advance the banking interests of his family, we have an unbiased view of the prelude to our Second War for Independence. Those men in Butternut and Gray took to the field of battle for the very same reason those men on Lexington Green stood in the face of the most powerful military on the planet: in defense of their personal freedoms and liberty, the right to consent of the governed and to avoid a crippling form of taxation— the theft of their own labor.

But, there is much more to this story as was revealed in other letters sent from Salomon James de Rothschild to his banking family in Europe. Letters we shall examine further in subsequent offerings on this subject.

IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY

Cultural Marxism destroying United States, Education Morass, False history

Where are the “Distressed Cavaliers” when we need them? (Hint: their gene pool has mostly been destroyed)

Leave a comment

resubmitted June 11, 2017

June 21, 2009 What the politicized institutions don’t want you to know.

The “Distressed Cavaliers”…….The best kept secret in our history, next to the truth about tyrant “Honest Abe”. (Read “The Real Lincoln” by Thomas DiLorenzo)

The Collectivists/Politically Correct purveyors’ worst nightmare would be for American citizens to learn of their true Founding history….from the establishment of Jamestown by adventurers and businessmen BEFORE the Pilgrim’s Plymouth Rock, the first Thanksgiving at Berkley Plantation, BEFORE the Pilgrims’, to the wonderment of the saga of the “Distressed Cavaliers”. (Such knowledge might give rise to the pride Americans once had in their heritage, something carefully destroyed by the Politically Correct method of Cultural Marxists.)

In the mid 1600’s Sir William Berkeley, Governor of Virginia, had the brilliant plan of recruiting the younger sons of English Noble families. He was able to entice them with promises of land and position because under the custom of the day, only the oldest son was allowed to inherit the family estate and fortune. Another contributing factor was the ascendency of the Puritans in England who persecuted the non-Puritans. Hence the name, “The Distressed Cavaliers”. (“Albion’s Seed”, by David Fischer)

From these ranks came young men of education, intelligence, bravery, honor, ambition, entrepreneurial ship, and leadership. Englishmen of breeding and substance. It was from this stock that the First Families of Virginia arose. They included names such as Custis, Harrison, Randolph, Mason, Madison, Washington, Lee, Jefferson, Jay, Carroll, etc.

Our beginnings and subsequent progress were not based on “Diversity”, a twisted concept at best. It was based on consistency, rule of law, honor, and a knowledge of the Enlightenment philosophy of Individualism. A man was judged by strict rules on conduct, which allowed those of lesser circumstances to function and succeed as well.

No wonder none of this is taught in the Collective Government Schools. Knowledge such as this might make for a citizenry schooled in merit and the fact that government’s only legitimate business is that of protecting the rights of the citizens and the Constitution.

A great country cannot grow based on ignorance, superstition, or anarchy, which is the result of multi-culturalism, (too many legal & illegal aliens from 3rd World cultures having little or no redeeming factors…in short all people are not the same; much depends on their achievements and values) leading to tyranny and dictatorship over the masses. Individual rights and freedoms are an anathema to Collectivists—whether Socialists, Fascists, Communists, or Monarchists.

Every aspect of Western Civilization is under attack and every other culture is being touted…all by design to destroy its very foundations. Some call it genocide.

Our Founders accomplished the most astonishing achievement in the history of the known world…they established a Constitutional Republic at the beginning of our nation, which differed drastically from Democracy (Mob Rule)which is how politicians, bureaucrats and other co-conspirators are fond of describing our system today, and all forms of Collectivism ever tried. The rights of the individual were held supreme, not the power of government. The Right to Life, Liberty, Property and the Pursuit of Happiness was not meant for government but for individual citizens.

Oh, how we need the Cavaliers today to vanquish the trolls and harpies who rule over us, demean and threaten our very existence.

Barbara McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

Education Morass, False history

The 156 year old “Civil War” cover-up continues…why?

Leave a comment

The 156 year old “Civil War” cover-up continues! Why? March 15, 2017

Throughout the South the assault on all things Southern continues. Why? The erasure of facts surrounding the War Between the States is the cover-up.

All government institutions, in one manner or another, are involved in this egregious counterfeit revision on the young. The fraudulent activities of the public school systems are the epicenter. Unfortunately, teachers are the purveyors and victims of the same system they are teaching, and they themselves for the most part are academically vacant on this subject, e.g. revisionism, conditioning, propagandizing, lying, taking the place of truth & honor.

The latest salvo launched against all things Southern rolled out of the Arkansas General Assembly stripping Lee from the Lee/King Holiday. Not that this is tragic, but what is tragic are the remarks of the head toxic weed himself, Gov. Asa Hutchinson who reckoned, “I think this does help unify our state”. Apparently the Governor thinks there is a meaningful breech between the black & white races. Explain.

Now to the tragedy, this Bill will have far reaching effects in the following manner. “The Bill also would require that Arkansas Public Schools provide instruction on American Civil Rights Leaders”, of course King would be the center piece. Followed by, “Schools also would be required to provide instruction on Arkansas and the Civil War with an emphasis on civilian & military leadership”, etc. Just imagine what the Dept of Ed will give them—more untruths to parade.

The lack of factual knowledge by a vast majority of Arkansas public school teachers borders on academic fraud which is being echoed by the Ark. Educational Assn. and the U.S. Dept. of Education—all corrupt to the core.

For all, a civil war is the result of one side trying to seize control of the central government. This was certainly not the case in the war for Southern Independence, again Independence. Both sides, if you are interested, were equally guilty of the sin of slavery, but the government’s 156 year old cover-up continues to prevail. The real Truths of the American Civil War are readily available & eye-opening in the archives in Washington DC & Richmond, VA, and others, not to mention the myriad of scholarly books on the subject such as “The Real Lincoln” by Thomas DiLorenzo—no PC in these writings and documents. The Yankees were a brutal lot.

To Mr. Rizelle Aaron, President of the Ark. Conference of the NAACP, please remove yourself from the scrolls of victimization. Blacks receive more unearned largesse (set-asides, quotas, and affirmative action), more political power & more freedoms than any ethnic group in the history of man. There are at least 3 Blacks in the Arkansas General Assembly who are well aware of the facts pertaining to the War Between the States.

It seems to me, as a leader in Black society and perhaps other areas, your group would best be served by engaging in genuine philosophical study and conversation that leads to a better quality of life across all fronts. Same should be said for U.S. government & most particularly for politicians & educators to indulge in truth & facts. Then a real free, functional society could be achieved.

Please see my article on this subject on arkansasfreedom.net entitled:
IN FACTUAL DEFENSE OF THE SOUTH August 17, 2015

Joe McCutchen

P.S. General R. E. Lee was a favorite of both the north & south in 1861—he earned that reputation through morality, honesty, brilliance, a real educator and always displayed himself as a gentleman. Same cannot said be said for Generals Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, etc.

False history

Happy Faux Thanksgiving!

Leave a comment

More Yankee revisionism November 23, 2016

Propagated by the former public schools system…now the government school system, other instruments of government and the media.
Most citizens are celebrating tomorrow November 24, 2016 as Thanksgiving Day.

The first official Thanksgiving Day was celebrated December 4, 1619 at the Berkeley Plantation located on the James River in the state of Virginia.

The Thanksgiving Day being celebrated tomorrow was held in October 1621 at Plymouth Rock, MA. 3 years after the real first Thanksgiving Day celebration.

Up the road a few miles from Berkeley is the Shirley Plantation, also on the banks of the James River. This is the location where Light Horse Harry Lee was married, the father of Union & more honorably Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Another significance is the fact that this was also the first birthplace of the symbol/image of the Pineapple which sends the message…friendship and safe passage.

Happy Faux Thanksgiving.

Joe & Barb McCutchen

arkansasfreedom.net

Education Morass, False history, Political Correctness - The Destroyer

HOODWINKED/”CIVIL WAR”

Leave a comment


HOODWINKED
At 79 years of age and the recipient of a B.A. from Baylor and an M.A. from Trinity, I believe I can testify as an expert witness against the institution called “Public Education”.

I have been incensed for numerous years at not only WHAT I was taught, but at what I was NOT taught…especially in the subject of American History.

If you think you are safe because you attended “back in the day”, think again!

Face it; we were lied to, whether intentionally or not, by our teachers. It’s a bitter pill to swallow. I once was a public school teacher, thank goodness not in American history where I might have been an unknowing purveyor of lies, distortions—revisionism.
Then you think about the unlucky young ones today when the entire system has sunk deeper & deeper into a collectivist cesspool—taking unsuspecting, innocent kids (& often parents) with it and lament.

A perfect example is the brouhaha encompassing the subject of the “Civil War” in recent times. Thanks to honest truth-seekers writing well-documented articles & books on the facts rather than the phantasmagoric tales told by the “victorious” Northern revisionist history writers, we are finally (after 150+ year Lincoln cover-up) able to understand what really happened and why. (See resource list below for some recommendations.)

The fact that the truth is finally making its way into public view is probably the true reason behind the resurgence & repetitive showings of the old TV series “Roots”.

According to numerous sources, Alex Haley’s “Roots” is pure fiction. (Here is one http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/6335-alex-haleys-fraudulent-roots )

Excerpts:
“In fact, to describe Roots merely as “fiction” is to treat Haley with more charity than he deserves. In at least three critical respects, Haley was downright dishonest.

Haley and the History of Slavery
Black commentator Stanley Crouch doesn’t mince words when it comes to Alex Haley. Haley, Crouch insists, was a “ruthless hustler” and “one of the biggest damn liars this country has ever seen.” Crouch likens Haley to Tawana Brawley, the young black woman who infamously lied about being raped and humiliated by a white police officer. Like the lie concocted by Brawley and abetted by the likes of Al Sharpton, Haley’s story is also a “hoax” that beautifully illustrates “how history and tragic fact can be pillaged by an individual willing to exploit whatever the naïve might consider sacred.”

“According to(Thomas) Sowell, Roots did more harm than good in fueling “the gross misconception that slavery was about white people enslaving black people.” In reality, “the tragedy of slavery was of a far greater magnitude than that.” Slavery knew no racial boundaries. “People of every race and color were both slaves and enslavers, for thousands of years, all around the world.” Sowell likens slavery to cancer in that it transcends time and place. He concludes: “If reparations were to be paid for slavery, everybody on this planet would owe everybody else.”

Haley and Plagiarism
“In the late 1960s, Harry Courlander — a white man — composed The African, a fictional work about a young African boy who is captured, made to endure the horrors of the mid-Atlantic passage, and eventually sold into slavery in America. In 1978 he sued Haley for plagiarism. Upon expressing regret that at least 81 passages were lifted virtually verbatim from Courlander’s novel and recast in Roots, and upon the Judge’s unambiguous finding that Haley was guilty of plagiarism, Haley agreed to an out of court settlement whereby he would pay Courlander $650,000 (roughly $2 million in today’s currency). “

Haley and his Roots

“Haley’s claims to the contrary aside, professional genealogists Gary B. and Elizabeth Shown Mills have demonstrated beyond a doubt that there is no formal documentation to corroborate “the oral tradition” regarding Haley’s family history. Moreover, the very documentation to which Haley refers — “plantation records, wills, census records” — repudiates this tradition. The Mills are to the point: “In truth, those same plantation records, wills, and censuses cited by Mr. Haley not only fail to document his story, but they contradict each and every pre-Civil War statement of Afro-American lineage in Roots.”

This merely demonstrates the tip of the lying iceberg behemoth of American history revisionism and the immense damage it has done to all Americans. Many Whites have taken on unnecessary, unearned guilt and many Blacks have been convinced that they are eternal “victims” of White oppression and use that as an excuse for bigotry, hatred, & sometimes criminal behavior. Ironically, mostly White politicians & bureaucrats have harmed more blacks (& other races) through the effects of the welfare state most likely than the institute of slavery in this country.

Conclusion: Virtually everything we have been told & taught regarding this particular period of time in our history, as well as the Founding & subsequent other periods of time have been skewed, twisted, revised and downright lied about. As a society, we have been hoodwinked, probably irreparably, into our own demise. The enlightened Founding Principles are lying at the bottom of the revisionist garbage heap, perhaps never to be rediscovered again.

~Barbara McCutchen

“The Real Lincoln” by Thomas DiLorenzo; “The South Was Right” by S.A. Steele; “Everything You Were Taught About the Civil War is Wrong” by Lochlainn Seabrook; “The Un-Civil War” by Leonard Scruggs

arkansasfreedom.net