Neo-Cons

Know your neoconservatives…esp. Tea Party Movement

Leave a comment


Arkansans—complicit, simpletons, or both?  Why do you not divorce yourselves from D.C. thugs, parasites, and criminals? You say you are going to take back this republic? No, you are not.  You do not have the courage, foresight, or wisdom.  Most of you are at sea with no compass.

All Tea Party Leaders, patriots, conservatives, etc. must be local and autonomous. (This statement taken from Luther)

Americans for Prosperity coming to Little Rock, June 12, 2010.

One of the Stars of this party is a fella by the name of Grover Norquist. So who is Grover Norquist?  He runs an organization called Americans for tax Reform—sounds good.  But who really is Grover Norquist? There is a triumvirate that the folks in Little Rock & environs should know about. Their names: Grover Norquist, Jack Abramoff, and Ralph Reed.

Grover Norquist is described in many circles, and with a good deal of evidence, that he was and may still be the conduit for millions of dollars that flowed from Abramoff clients through Norquist’s ATR. Norquist’s involvement with the 2nd group, Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy received $500,000 in Abramoff client funds.  Then comes Ralph Reed, the former Christian Coalition Executive Director and his involvement in Abramoff’s Tribal & Internet gambling clients. Norquist moved more than $1 million in Abramoff client money to Reed and the Christian Anti-gambling groups.

How deep are Norquist’s involvements with Muslims, particularly since he’s married to one?  The last account of Abramoff was that his residence was in barbed wire city.

Norquist advocates open borders and regulation of television.

By the way, Norquist, Reed, & Abramoff are old college buddies.

Enter Stephen Moore. Moore has bounced all over the political landscape (you can never get rid of one of these political parasites). Moore is presently on the editorial staff of the Wall Street Journal. The fact he is employed by the WSJ is proof positive he is a neocon embracing the neocon agenda, i.e. conquering the entire Mideast, except for Israel of course.  For those of you who missed the lecture on Neoconservatism, founded by the Russian immigrant Trotskyite, Irving Kristol, father of William (Weekly Standard) who are Isreal-firsters and are the consummate standard bearers for “eternal war for eternal peace”…..formerly known as the Republican Party.

He is founder of Club for Growth & Free Enterprise Fund, member of Cato Institute, Heritage Foundation, the Fair Tax, associate of Dick Armey, written for neoconservative National Review, WSJ, Human Events, Readers Digest…..all indicating a Fascist Pedigree.

Moore stated immigrants are a “self-selected elite” (just because they have uprooted themselves) The fact is “immigrants” are over represented in poverty & prisons.

In a 4/30/10 article by Kane & Johnson, they agreed with Moore’s position that “it is folly to blame immigrants for hurting the economy at a time when the economy is simply not hurting”.

These are just some of the many reasons you won’t “Take Back America”…you still do not comprehend the Neoconservatives who are hijacking the Republican Party and the Tea Party Movement.

Kindest regards,

Joe McCutchen

See “Beware the return of the Neocons”   arkansasfreedom.net  in order to connect the dots.

city government offenses, City Politics

All governments are canderous & expanding

Leave a comment


All governments are cancerous—unfortunately the only means these cancers can be eradicated is the application of chemo-therapy to the cancerous cells in all government—elected and unelected.

In the midst of an economic depression and a bankrupt federal government, politicians and bureaucrats continue their adulterous spending orgy, reinforced by selective law enforcement.

A topical examination of the city of Fort Smith, Arkansas.

  1. The city continues a blatant violation of an Arkansas statute which forbids government agencies from hiring illegals or those businesses who sub out to others who do hire illegals. The Fort city government turns a blind eye to said statute and violates the law with impunity. A city government insider opined the city didn’t have time to police businesses they hire. 
  2. In 1986 a law was passed in Arkansas making English the official language. Gov. Bill Clinton signed this law making it official in 1987. (Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-4-117: Official Language 1987)
    1. Fort Smith Ark. Mayor Ray Baker proclaims English as the official language in 2007.
    2. There are at least 4 different ethnicities in Fort Smith who demand their native language be utilized in government transactions, i.e. food, shelter, meds, hospitals, etc. Most not mandated by the federal government.
    3. To make the above statement ring in the ears of the deaf & stupid, Barbara and I were in the Sebastian County Courthouse to vote today where there were more Hispanics coming and going into the courthouse who could not speak English, than there were American citizens.  These uninvited nesters knew exactly where to go to get their criminal unearned largesse dispensed by the equally criminal government employees.  Who says they’re “hiding in the shadows”?
    4. In an exaggerated effort by the Fort Smith city government to pass a “Hamburger Tax” or “Employee Tax” to bailout the $33 million failed Convention Center, the city again attacks the economic producers of the city. An abbreviated assessment of city revenues reveals that income for the city from tax revenues was $106 million with $103 million expenditures…a $3 million surplus in 1998.  In year 2008 revenues were $247 million, with spending at $214 million leaving a surplus of $33 million for that year alone.  Where is it?
  3. Next comes another corrupted & bloated system, the Fort Smith school district, e.g. offering a “feeding program” for free breakfast & lunch for any child from 1 to 18 yrs of age.  Not one word from the self-serving, parasitic bureaucratic & political community.  Their mantra=Grow the Government! Printed “Free Food” invitations were offered in multiple languages.  Superintendent Benny Gooden allows that 70% of students qualify for “free” meals.  With illegal invasions and millions of Americans out of work, Gooden never challenges these outrages.  Question: On what authority does Gooden steal money by force from one group and dispense to another group? Particularly when many recipients are not legal citizens.  Remember, Gooden’s the guy who said “we’ll take all we can get” in reference to illegal aliens.  Why?  More expansion and funding. 
  4. Another in line at the trough is Chancellor Paul Beran, Fort Smith’s own fundraising clone of Pastor John Hagee.  Beran’s shill in the UAFS budget department is Mark Horn.  Beran and Horn have raised next year’s budget by $3.13 million.  Herein lies the fuzzy math.  Horn projects a 3% growth in the 2010-2011 fiscal period, yet he and Beran have increased the budget by 5.74% and they sign off on the robbery by stating “they won’t know the actual numbers until well into the year”.  What happens to the money if their fuzzy projections don’t materialize?

The Fort Smith city government, over the years, has inflated its budgets which produces huge surpluses at the end of each fiscal year.  As already pointed out, 2008 produced a $33 million surplus.  Why then is this city administration fanning the flames for another tax increase?

The Mayor’s projected slush-fund for FY 10 is $246, 330.00. 

What say the citizen Jury?

Kindest regards,

Joe McCutchen

Fort Smith

Boozman record, Neo-Cons, Representative Boozman

Americans for Prosperity & John Boozman

99 Comments


Arkansans—complicit—simpletons—or both?  Americans for Prosperity & Congressman John Boozman

First, Republicans/Conservatives/Patriots, etc. overwhelmingly chose Congressman John Boozman as their candidate for the U.S. Senate.  Why?  This man is inextricably tied to the mantra “eternal war for eternal peace” by his membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the military arm of the United Nations. His recent criminal acts against the Constitution and citizens are on arkansasfreedom.net  by viewing the paid political ad along with other articles.  More to come.

Second: Guess who’s coming to Arkansas on June 12th?  “Americans for Prosperity”. 

CFR member Grover Norquist jumps out, followed by the “courageous” ex-border & drug Czar, Asa Hutchinson, an abject failure.  Asa had the power and opportunity to secure our borders and stop the illegal drug and human trafficking…and squandered them, for whatever reason.

Why the concern?  The Council of Foreign Relations is the New York City arm of the Rothschild’s banking empire and much, much more. The Rothschild’s conglomerate is the major partner in the Washington Post organization. They manipulate the world’s currency and their huge in implementing global governance.

Grover Norquist has assumed the mantle of the behind the scenes “puller of strings” for the Tea Party Movement. Norquist is a counterfeit conservative.  In addition to his scurrilous so-called “conservative” tax movements he can only be described as a very successful fundraiser for the religious and/or patriotic issues of the day.

Major funding for “Americans for Prosperity” comes from such bigs as the murky “Koch Family Foundation”; ExxonMobil; the Cato Institute; and the secretive “Scaife Family Foundations”.  These organizations and their many satellites have never influenced a piece of Constitutional legislation and are devoid of any successes in the name of true “Conservatism”.

Follow the money and the power.

Kindest regards,

Joe McCutchen

Boozman record, Political Parties-the 2 headed snake

Boozman ad in Times Record 5/15/10

Leave a comment


CONGRESSMAN JOHN BOOZMAN

Congressman John Boozman


Should ask for forgiveness and apologize for his 10 year failed incumbency

His legislative chicanery has almost achieved fait accompli of the Republic.

I.     His attacks on the Constitution:

       1.    Voted for Patriot Acts twice

       2.    Voted for Military Commissions Act

       3.    Voted for No Child Left Behind…federal government

              takeover of public education

       4.    Supports rendition and torture

       5.    Voted funding for 3 preemptive undeclared wars

       6.    Voted for $700 billion TARP Bailout

       7.    Voted for Homegrown Terrorist Act…allowing

              government to declare any American citizen a “terrorist”

       8.    Voted for prescription drug bill (10 yr. cost $350 billion)

       9.    Voted billions in new taxes

       10.  Etc. etc, etc.

II.    Headline Times Record…2008…Boozman declares war on

       illegal aliens. Results: None

III.   Headline Times Record…March 2009…Boozman pushing

       economic development in Arkansas and Job production.

       Results: None

IV.    Front-page Times Record…May, 2010…(a year later)

       Boozman plans bus tour to push campaign, Jobs.

       He calls it “Driving for Jobs”…how asinine.

V.    Exorbitant international travel, wife often included. Usual

       excuse…”fact finding,” compliments of citizen taxpayers.

       Recently quoted, “my next trip will be throughout Arkansas.” For the citizens needs in the Third Congressional District Boozman is irrelevant, for their billfolds and liberties he is dangerous.

Documentation for the above and much more can be found at www.arkansasfreedom.com and scrolling down to Congressman John Boozman and his 10 year assault on the Constitution.

State Senator Gilbert Baker, also a candidate for the U.S. Senate, is a huge Tax & Spender, e.g. his votes for tax increases too numerous to list.

Political Advertisement – Paid for by Joe McCutchen

Arkansas Friendship Coalition, Illegal immigration facts

Who facilitates the illegal alien invasion? Arkansas Friendship Coalition

Leave a comment


The Arkansas Friendship Coalition….who, what, why?

What do billionaires, corporations, certain churches, academia, businesses, and anti-American ethnocentric organizations have in common? (See founding membership list below)

http://www.arfriendshipcoalition.org/images/header_foundingmembers.gif

Rev. Steve Copley, Chair of the of Arkansas Friendship Coalition and a United Methodist pastor (Collectivist/exploiter?)

Archie Schaffer, Government Affairs, Tyson Foods  (Exploiter?)

Randy Wilbourn, Alltel Corporation (Exploiter?)

Rita Sklar, Director of the Arkansas affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union (Collectivist)

Warren Stephens, Stephens Inc. (Exploiter?)

Rev. Gordon Garlington and Rev. Howard Gordon, Presbyterian pastors (Collectivist exploiters?)

Neal Sealy, ACORN (Communist organizers?)

Tommy Fish, Associated General Contractors (AGC) (Exploiter?)

Graham Catlett and Paul Charton, Catlett and Stodola Law Firm (Exploiters?)

Rev. Michael Mattox, Methodist minister (Collectivist?)

Bishop Larry Maze, retired Episcopal Bishop  (Collectivist exploiter?)

Stacy Sells and Michele Bond, Cranford Johnson Robinson Woods   (Exploiters?)

Mary Beth Ringgold, A restaurateur and owner of Cajun’s Wharf, Copper Grill and Capers (Exploiter?)

Rabbi Gene Levy, Reform Jewish leader in Little Rock (Collectivist exploiter?)

Rev. Lowell Grisham of Fayetteville, An Episcopalian priest (Collectivist exploiter?)

Skip Rutherford, Clinton School of Public Service (Collectivist?)

Rev. Joyce Hardy, An Episcopalian pastor (Collectivist exploiter?)

Penelope Sur, A graduate student at the Clinton School of Public Service (Collectivist?)

Alan Leveritt, Publisher of Arkansas Times and El Latino newspapers (Collectivist/Exploiter?)

Haskell Dickinson, President of McGeorge Contracting (Exploiter?)

Rev. Bob Klein, A Unitarian Universalist pastor  (Collectivist exploiter?)

Rev. Wendell Griffen, A Baptist pastor (Collectivist?)

Ruth Shepherd, Just Communites of Central Arkansas (Collectivist?)

Ana Hart, Just Communities of Northwest Arkansas (Collectivist?)

Jim Miranda, Community Activist Arkansas LULAC (Collectivist?)

Karla Bradley, ESL Educator, Fayetteville (Collectivist?)

John and Karen DiPippa, (Collectivist exploiters?)

The answer is simple.  Exploitation for profit and/or destruction of our Constitutional Republic in favor of complete redistribution of wealth, i.e. Socialism/Communism/Fascism, all forms of Collectivism.

Greedy businesses exploit illegal alien slave labor while saddling taxpayers with the costs of their education, healthcare, housing, food, penal, et al.  Great for their bottom lines!  Disaster for struggling taxpaying, law-abiding citizens.

Greedy churches exploit illegal aliens, by posturing as altruistic caretakers, in exchange for their membership, allegiance, donations, and government funding.  (Catholic Charities alone has received Billions of tax dollars)

Greedy organizations and ethnocentric groups receive generous funding from anti-American sources seeking ideological and/or financial goals.  Many also get government funding in the millions.

Exploiters and enablers are part of a gigantic protection racket, including government (program expansion), media, and academia (all ideological enemies of our Constitutional Republic & individual rights) .

Lowly taxpayers are to be used, abused and tossed aside, after all they aren’t worthy of real consideration, only exploitation via propaganda.  The Elite think they are above all that, but so did the royalty during the French Revolution.  See article below describing the call for non & anti-Americans to defy our laws and make demands on our government and citizens.

National Latino Congreso Conveners Call for Boycott of Arizona

View Article at LatinoCongreso.org                    (EXCERPT)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                       
May 10, 2010                           
                         

Contacts:                             Lillian Rodriguez Lopez, Hispanic Federation, 212-233-8955

Rosa Rosales, LULAC, 202-833-6130

Nativo Lopez, MAPA, 323-269-157

Angela Sanbrano, NALACC, 323-371-7305

 Antonio Gonzalez, SVREP & WCVI, 323-222-2217

 National Latino Congreso Conveners Call for Boycott of Arizona

“The National Latino Congreso (NLC) joins Congressman Raul Grijalva and a growing number of national, regional, and local organizations in calling for a boycott against the state of Arizona until SB1070 is repealed.

Retrograde and discriminatory (untrue) is how SB1070, signed into law on Friday, April 23, 2010 by Governor Jan Brewer, has been defined by organizations from across the country. Law enforcement agencies throughout Arizona will have the legal obligation, not discretion, to interrogate anyone regarding their legal immigration status and proceed to arrest and detain them if found to be unauthorized. (Untrue)The law also provides for a private right of action by the common citizen to pursue sanctions against any agency that does not enforce the law.

It is the equivalent of a statewide Sensenbrenner Bill, the infamous anti-immigrant legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in December 2005, which gave rise to massive opposition mega-marches nationally during 2006.

The NLC is mindful that a boycott of Arizona is a serious undertaking and takes this action only after thorough deliberation amongst its affiliates. As Congressman Grijalva stated recently, however, “such a historical action represented by this legislation requires consequences – legal, political, and economic.”

The NLC also recognizes that the Latino Community of Arizona (not the legals) has opposed the     enactment of S.B.1070 as well as other legislation with a similar intent and impact. It further recognizes and respects that resistance to these laws is most directly organized in Arizona and supported by allies throughout the country. The boycott, which NLC supports, was called for and is being guided by activists in Arizona. They have asked that we launch our efforts and continue them until Arizona repeals these reprehensible and xenophobic laws”…….(in other words, lawbreakers should be given carte blanche and law abiders condemned.)

The outrageous gall and behavior of these groups is breathtaking and demonstrates the size and scope of this outlaw movement.  They are of course emboldened by influential groups like the Arkansas Friendship Coalition and the lack of law enforcement.

Federal law 8 USC (1996) makes it a FELONY to hire, aid, abet, transport, or shelter any illegal alien, with heavy fines and imprisonment if convicted. (Can you imagine the millions in fines and years in prison the Tyson’s would get?) Also, all non-citizens in the country must carry their legal permission papers with them at all times.  The law also has provisions demanding ALL law enforcement have the authority to arrest both illegal aliens and those who aid them.

It is abundantly clear that certain rich and powerful individuals will literally do anything to promote their own interests, including the destruction of our nation.

What price money and power?  What must they think as they instigate and watch our standard of living disintegrate due to their handiwork?  Some no doubt rejoice in their collectivist ideology, but what of the Americans who were successful because of what our Republic used to be before their treasonous actions?  Such callousness is difficult to fathom.

An unchecked invasion of Third Worlders can accomplish nothing other than drag our country down to that status, with all its corruption, lawlessness, and degradation of our heritage, culture, and sovereignty.  They get away with actions they would never be able to facilitate in their own countries, yet they remain fiercely loyal to the places from which they fled, while hating the host nation….reminiscent of the barbarians sacking Rome.

The invaders power comes from the Communist mentality which invented the insidious tool of “Political Correctness/Diversity/Racism” and successfully inculcated it into our culture via all our important institutions, e.g. education, media, entertainment, financial, politics/government, etc.  Otherwise the illegals would be seen for the criminals they are and would not be allowed into the U.S. much less trample everything we hold dear.

Question: Will all the members of the AFC be allowed to keep their wealth or in the long run will they fall prey to the evil and brutality of forced redistribution they have helped unleash?  If justice were to prevail, the answer is a resounding YES.

Anyone who cares a fig about the U.S., rule of law, individual rights, responsibilities, freedoms must recognize who our enemies are, both foreign and domestic and their names exposed, repudiated, and punished.  Otherwise your children and your children’s children will live their lives in a dangerous, hostile, corrupt, tyrannical land.

Let the people named in this expose’ know that you know what they are doing and why, and that you abhor them for it.  Don’t let them keep smirking as they get away with offense after offense.  Whatever happened to decent, honest citizens??

~Barbara McCutchen

Cultural Marxism destroying United States, philosophy

Cradle of Civilization self-destructing

Leave a comment


The cradle of civilization, i.e. philosophy, logic, reason, science is in the chaos of self-destructing.  How ironic that the people of Greece cannot think their way out of the Collective trap into which they fell.

Big Government = tyranny.  Government has no way to acquire big money except by force.  The Collectivists have convinced many of illogical, insane concepts—that you can spend more than you earn and not go bankrupt; that unearned rewards are somehow justifiable; that something for nothing is desirable.

Results include irrationalities like some deserve “entitlements”, therefore taking by force from some to distribute to others is desirable…especially if you can play the “race card” and “victimization”.

The rioters in Greece feel victimized because their government can no longer afford them.  The majority of Grecians works for and/or receives government checks…and the U.S. is not far behind.

Governments’ goal is expansion.  Common sense, property rights, Bill of Rights, justice be damned.

Greece reduced its citizens to whining, inept, helpless people who expect to be taken care of, now they are an angry mob demanding their “rights”, not unlike the illegal aliens in the U.S.

Chaos, anarchy, police-state tyranny are logical consequences of such thinking/policies.

This country is galloping down that road, only differences are the size, scope, technology, and sheer power of the U.S. government versus Greece which makes it more dangerous.

Will the world learn from union rioters in Greece, Muslim riots in France, or the illegal alien protests in America?  The Third Worlders learn the West has been brought to its knees by “multiculturalism”, “diversity”, and unearned rewards.

Unless the West shakes loose from political correctness and returns to common sense meritocracy, rule of law and individual rights it will continue to sink into the morass of mankind’s dismal past…from Dark Ages to the jungle.

~Barbara McCutchen

Arkansas Six, Illegal immigration facts

Fax re illegal alien invasion + Puerto Rico statehood scam = Dim votes

1 Comment

To the Arkansas Six:         Lincoln, Pryor, Snyder, Ross, Boozman, Berry            April 28, 2010

Your silence reminds me of that beautiful old Christmas hymn, Silent Night. 

Your silence is deafening regarding the illegal Mexican and OTM invasion.  Do you six have any comprehension that the state of Arkansas is now being called a Border State?  Surely I do not have to tell you why. How many Arkansas workers have been displaced by illegal Mexican nationals and your failure to uphold your sworn Constitutional duties?  Let me tell you, at least ¼ million.

You six have sat on your self-serving parasitic butts through the totality of your terms and allowed our once preeminent republic to become nothing more than a balkanized, third world dumping ground—all by design.  Both parties, but most particularly the Democrat party. 

Obama, the cultural Marxist and displaced Kenyan has absolutely destroyed the best thing every created by mankind in a year and a half—our republic.   You 5 Democrats are indeed a pathetic lot that you would stand by and show reverence to the Marxist Democrat party and sellout your constituencies.

The Republican amongst you is no better, he is equally silent.  You are all owned by the Arkansas Friendship Coalition.

Tomorrow will be interesting to see if any of you will have the courage to vote against the Puerto Rican power grab.

Please don’t continue to destroy our republic.  Display some courage, honor, and integrity.

Kindest regards,

Joe McCutchen

Fort Smith

Illegal immigration facts

Arizona vs. corrupt government

Leave a comment


Arizona’s illegal immigration survival law and the criminal response from President Obama and certain elected Senators & Congressmen.

Analyze Obama’s criminal response to Arizona’s new anti-illegal immigration bill. 

  1. Obama says it is unconstitutional.  Ask the question…why is it unconstitutional?  Protecting our borders from invasion is one of the 17 responsibilities that the U.S. Constitution dictates.  The Mexican & OTM invasion has been in full stride since the 1960’s and many efforts have been made to stimulate the various presidents and congresses to uphold their sworn constitutional duties in the matter of illegal immigration/invasion.  These numbers have swelled to 25-35 million, not the 12 million the corrupt federal government parrots.
  2. Another question:  on what basis do Obama & certain members of Congress have in asserting that what Arizona has done is unconstitutional when the federal government has sold out the American people, particularly white middleclass citizens, by not securing our borders and upholding federal law which has been in place since 1966?  I refer to 8 USC and all its subsections dealing specifically with every minute detail regarding the illegal Mexican & OTM invasion. Therefore:  the president and federal government have been derelict in their constitutional duties by not securing our national borders and have forfeited any right to challenge Arizona or any other state as being involved in an unconstitutional act.
  3. We constantly hear corrupt politicians and media speak of our “broken” immigration system and reform is needed.  Another lie.  When these traitors speak of the system being broken and needing reform they are simply saying, award the 25-35 million illegals with amnesty and the right to bring in their family from the mother country.
  4. Another one of the open-borders sects parrots, we must bring the illegals “out of the shadows”…right out of Asa Hutchinson’s play book.  The fact is a citizen can go nowhere without stumbling over any number of illegal nesters. It is the traitorous politicians and bureaucrats who need to come out of the shadows.
  5. Brutal gang activity…MS-13, along with many others who have infiltrated the whole of our society.


This day Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made an absolutely incongruous statement regarding the national illegal immigration/invasion and the Arizona legislation.  “Now is certainly not the time to address illegal immigration, we have a 10% unemployment rate (actually 17%) and we need these undocumented workers for their income”.  Want to explain that Senator?  No regard for the millions of unemployed Americans.  Did I say McConnell’s statement is incongruous?  It is downright stupid and traitorous.  If there ever was a time to address the illegal invasion it is now!  By the way, McConnell is married to Elaine Chao, former Administrator of the Maritime Commission and Secretary of Labor and daughter of the owner of the Chinese Overseas Shipping Company. This represents a huge conflict of interests.


Another Republican traitor, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) has joined hands with the Marxist Democrats to award amnesty. 


According to the criminally corrupt Obama, what was formerly known as the Democrat Party…now known as the Progressive/Marxist/Communist party and some Republicans, now Neo-Conservatives/Fascists/Globalists want us to forget that we are a collection of sovereign states…not the United STATE of America, and we are obligated  to defend our sovereignty and integrity.   The mantra being used by the federal government and many state governments (exemplified by Ark. Governors Huckabee & Beebe) “if the feds don’t uphold its sworn duty then the citizens of the various states are to lie down and be overrun by the illegal Mexican nationals & OTM invaders”…not so, gentlemen.


Our own people are selling out the Republic for filthy lucre and power, coupled with anti-American groups such as AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, and ACLU. Also the rabblerousing Mexican organizations  La Raza (the Race), LULAC, Maldef, MeCha.  All these organizations have in their armentaraium is constantly yelling “Racist”, “Anti-Semite”, “Bigot”, and any number of other incendiaries.  These are the same people that today are fomenting unrest and hurling bottles at the Phoenix police officers.


Back to the political rubbish, Racial Profiling.  Obviously, the best tool to identify illegal Mexicans and OTM’s is racial profiling.   who makes up the majority of the illegal population?  Mexicans, of course.  So, why by any standard would you forfeit your most effective tool in rounding up illegals?  Illegals and their enablers cry “it violates Mexican illegals and Mexican American citizens’ civil rights”…..how?  Exactly what are the “civil rights” of illegal aliens?


The U.S. is patrolling the globe unconstitutionally by deploying 400,000 American troops defending the borders of 130 countries, yet the U.S. government refuses to defend the most important border of all…OURS!


ICE is a huge, toothless organization (by design) which is an embarrassment to hard-working American taxpaying citizens.  If they were worth their salt, they would enforce 8 USC and cuff Don & John Tyson, end of crisis.


Kindest regards,


Joe McCutchen


arkansasfreedom.net  


Boozman record, Candidates 2010

Boozman’s assault on the Constitution

7 Comments


Congressman John Boozman and his 10 year assault on the U.S. Constitution

Irrelevancy comes to mind, but if you have no regard for the Constitution, as is the case with Boozman, he is anything but irrelevant.

During his 8 years with Bush, he was nothing more than a rubber stamp. 

  1. He voted not once, but twice for the Patriot Acts which negated the 4th Amendment (protection against search & seizure, wiretapping, police brutality, etc.)
  2. He voted for the Military Commissions Act which negates Habeas Corpus (protection of the right to bring the accused before a court or judge to decide the legality of detention, in a reasonable time frame)
  3. He voted for the destruction of Posse Comitatus (designed to prevent the military from becoming involved in domestic affairs, as was the case in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.)
  4. Boozman voted for a $700 Billion TARP bailout…the Stabilization Act of 2008.
  5. Boozman is on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) committee.  NATO was created after WWII to reactivate Europe’s economy.  NATO is being kept alive by Globalists whose goals are to destroy national sovereignties by military interventions, and sometimes dubious peaceful means, e.g. the European Union & the Balkan Wars.
  6. The U.S. is bankrupt, yet we have 400,000 American troops patrolling and securing borders  globally with a military presence in 130 countries while refusing to secure our own national borders, 3 preemptive wars, and quite possibly engaging in a 4th  The mantra is “eternal war for eternal peace”.  He votes each time for subsidies for the military when the battle cry should be to return our troops home. The “War on Terror” is a cruel, inhumane hoax, while violence and murders occur daily on our borders, along with environmental destruction. debacle, all based on lies, while killing and maiming millions in the process—all sides. This all for the military/industrial complex and Israel; note the perpetual expansion and creation of new military bases, here and globally.
  7. Boozman voted for the federal government takeover of public schools, e.g. the odious No Child Left Behind scam.
  8. He voted for the Marxist prescription drug plan.
  9. He voted for the silencing of the 1st Amendment by voting for the “Homegrown Terroristic Act”, which empowers the government to declare ANYTHING they deem an “extremist belief system”, instantly making anyone a terrorist, resulting in stripping of U.S. citizenship, torture, and/or execution.  No ability to challenge even in the U.S. Supreme Court.
  10. The most dastardly act of Cong. John Boozman was to vote for and support Rendition/Torture.  The insane fools who perpetrate and support this heinous act have no regard for morality and/or ethics. These armchair generals have no experience in any regard concerning the brutality of rendition & torture.

Times Record headline (March, 2009) Boozman declares that he’s pushing for economic development in Arkansas and job production.  Results=none. 

Times Record headline, June, 2008 Boozman declares war on illegal immigration. Results=none.  As Boozman is enamored with international travel, he has never visited the southwestern border contiguous with Mexico where the REAL war is occurring…a murdering war and a cultural war. He has personally been invited on 3 occasions, expenses paid, to travel to the aforementioned border, which he declined. Could it be that Boozman is protecting the assets of Tyson’s, Simmons, OK Foods, ad infinitum?

Three particularly amusing quotes offered by Sarah Huckabee, Boozman’s campaign manager and daughter of former Ark. Gov. Mike Huckabee…she said “Arkansans are looking for a leader…who will take the country up, not tear others down”. (huh?)  “John Boozman doesn’t have a bit of DC…in him, not now, not today, not tomorrow, not ever”…(then why does he want to return for 6 more years?).   “John is the only guy with the experience that it’s going to take to lead this state and lead this country against people like Pelosi, Reid, & Obama”. I challenge Sarah to demonstrate one instance John Boozman has been in a leadership capacity or taken a courageous stand on any issue pertaining to the preservation of our Republic. Speaking of the Huckabees, their Constitutional records are appalling, e.g. pointing to Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, paraphrasing…no individual or compact shall make any kind of agreement with a foreign land without U.S. Congressional approval.

Former Gov. Huckabee did just that (without approval) in striking an agreement with former Mexican president Vicente Fox to establish a Mexican Consulate in Little Rock to aid and abet illegal Mexican nationals. (See www.arkanasfreedom.com for documentation of many offenses, “Arkansas own Trail of Tears”)

In Sarah Huckabee’s context and in the arena of legislation and statesmanship, Boozman is irrelevant, but in the arena of global travel he has no equal in Congress. With reference to our state delegation and other delegations, Boozman topped the list of well-travelled Congressmen.

In 2008 he was only in D.C. 39 days.

 For this purpose of making a point about “Travelin’ John” let’s look at 2009 only.   Congressman Boozman, in addition to his NATO involvement, is also a member of the “African Sub-committee”.  (Shows where the congressman’s priorities are). Note during the Bush years he never achieved the Chairmanship of any committee of which he was member.  Boozman’s 2009 travelling extravaganza began in February.  Boozman travelled to Belgium, France, Austria and Germany.  In April he went to Germany, Qatar, Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Afghanistan, Cape Verde, Djibouti, Rwanda and Ghana.  In November he went to Ireland and Scotland.  He has also made numerous trips to Iraq.  He is scheduled to attend another NATO Parliamentary Assembly to be held in May, 2010 in Riga, Latvia.

Recently he was quoted “my next trip will be throughout Arkansas”.  Hurrah for the Congressman.  It should be noted here that his wife accompanied him on a number of the Congressman’s safaris.

How many millions of the taxpayers’ hard earned money has he spent and what exactly has he accomplished for those citizens?

Kindest regards,

Joe & Barbara McCutchen

P.S.  Please distribute all over Arkansas for voters information

See Boozman’s tax voting record below….courtesy of Debbie Pelley.

Congressman John Boozman Voting Record

(Candidate for Arkansas US Senate)

by Women Action Group

 

With a national debt of $10 trillion, Boozman voted for the $700 million Bailout.

Bailout Bill – Stabilization Act of 2008, H.R. 1424 authorized the Treasury Department to use $700 billion of taxpayer money to purchase troubled mortgage-related securities from banks and other financial-related institutions, on terms set by the Treasury Secretary, who now has authority to manage and sell those assets.  This bill establishes an unconstitutional merger of government with banks and businesses.  Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424) passed 263-171 (Roll Call 681) on October 3, 2008. 171 other Representatives voted more conservatively than did Boozman on this bill.

 

Boozman voted against protecting taxpayers from bailing out banks in 2005.

A representative offered an amendment to “eliminate the ability of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to borrow from the Treasury.”  Rep Ron Paul stated on the floor, “I hope my colleagues join me in protecting taxpayers from having to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when the housing bubble bursts.”  The House rejected the amendment on October 26, 2005, by a  vote of 47-371 (Roll Call 544). 

 

With a national debt of $6 trillion, Boozman voted for the Prescription Drug Plan.

            Prescription Drug Plan H.R. 4954   – Ten Year Cost:  $350 Billion.  Uses taxpayer money to subsidize costs of prescription drugs for those on Medicare.  This was another step in the direction of socialized medicine.  Passed June 28, 2002 by 221-208.

 

Boozman voted to increase the national budget and debt ceiling year after year.

*Budget Resolution – House Concurrent Resolution 95 authorized federal spending for 2004 of $1,861 billion dollars with a deficit of $558 billion and an increase in the public debt ceiling of $984 billion, for a total of $7.4 trillion  This dwarfs the previous record federal deficit of  $290 billion in 1992.   Adopted April 11, 2003 by a vote of 216 to 211 (Roll Call 141)  211 Representatives voted more conservatively than Boozman.  During his nine years in office Boozman kept voting for increased budgets and spending bills, big and small for nine years, even when our national debt had reached $9 and $10 trillion, and stopped doing so only when Obama became President.

 

Boozman received an average score of only 43% by the Club for Growth for 2006-2008 compared to true conservatives like Rep. Michelle Bachman’s  94% average and Senator Jim DeMint 100% average. Club for Growth’s goal is to cut taxes and treat taxpayers equally.  

 

Boozman voted for NAIS (Animal ID) by refusing to vote for this Amendment:

Defunding the NAIS, also called Animal ID, in the 207 Agriculture Appropriations H.R.5384.  A representative introduced this amendment to bar the use of funds in the bill to implement the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), a government program supposedly for preventing the spread of disease.  The House rejected this Amendment on May 23, 2006, by a vote of 34-389 (Roll Call 184).   NAIS recommends, and some say mandates, attaching recommended tags with microchips for all animals that would allow the computerized recording of livestock movements from birth to the slaughterhouse. The extra cost of radio tags, scanners and filing reports when animals change premises would be crushing, some smaller producers say.

 

Boozman supports No Child Left Behind (NCL, a national education program.

On his website, Boozman praises No Child Left Behind, saying, “Like many of my colleagues in Congress, I am eager for the reauthorization of NCLB.”  Despite the billions of state and federal dollars that Congress added to spending on education through NCLB, this year’s National Assessment of Education Progress scores (the NAEP test that is referred to as the Nation’s Report Card) show no improvement this year nor any significant improvement for the past several years. 

 

Even worse, NCLB is the mechanism that has been used for the federal government to take over our educational systems and to basically control the curriculum in every state in the union. Through NCLB and with Stimulus money, Obama is now  implementing national/international curriculum (UN curriculum) in our schools. Janet Napolitano was chair of the international benchmarking advisory group over these standards.  Imagine our school curriculum being written by Napolitano. Napolitano is the one that sent out the DHS warning to law enforcement officials across the nation to be on alert for violent antigovernment groups like returning veterans, citizens opposing abortion, firearms restrictions, homosexuality, and out of control spending. 

 

With a national debt of $9 trillion, Boozman voted for the lst stimulus bill in 2008:

Economic Stimulus of 2008.  H.R. 5140.  Provided about  $150 billion in economic stimulus, including $101.1 billion in direct payments of rebate checks (typically $600) to most taxpayers in 2008 and temporary tax breaks for businesses.  H.R. 5140 passed 385-35 on January 29, 2008, (Roll Call 25).   Creating money out of thin air and then spending the newly created money cannot improve the economy, at least not in the long term.  (If it could, why not create even more money for rebates and make every American a millionaire?)

 

Boozman supported mandatory program to combat global warming.

Global Climate Change.  The House voted on an amendment to strike from the bill (H.R. 2643) a mandatory program to combat global warming.  H.R. 2643 specifically says, “the sense of the Congress that there should be enacted a comprehensive and effective national program of mandatory, market-based limits and incentives” to reduce global greenhouse- gas emissions. An example of so called “market-based limits” would be a cap and trade system.  The House (Boozman included)  rejected the Barton amendment, and thereby kept the global warming language in the bill, by a vote of 153-274  (Roll Call 555) on June 26,2007.

 

Boozman voted for several so-called Free Trade Agreements: 

These trade agreements have caused hundreds of  US companies to move to foreign countries in order to take advantage of cheap labor, causing millions of job losses in the United States. NAFTA alone has cost more than one million US job opportunities.

 

The loss of sovereignty is another problem with trade agreements. In the Peru Free Trade Agreement legislation of November 8, 2007, the Committee on Ways and Means reported that “the Peru FTA has become the first U.S. free trade agreement to include, in its core test fully enforceable commitments by the Parties to adopt, maintain, and enforce basic international labor standards, as stated in the 1988 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.”  The ILO, or International Labor Organization, is a UN agency. For a list of five free trade agreements for which Boozman voted see this link: http://www.wpaag.org/Boozman%20-%20Trade%20Agreements%20voted%20for.htm

 

Boozman voted to fund National Endowment of the Arts (NEA), HR5386

NEA received $129.41 million from this legislation.  NEA has funded such works as “Piss Christ, with a crucifix submerged in the artist’s urine,” and other anti-Christian and pornographic works. HR 5386 also included $145.96 million for National Endowment of the Humanities and $7.56 billion for the Environmental Protection Agency.  The title of this bill was “Interior Department FY 20007 Appropriations Bill.”  The total cost of the bill was $25.57 billion (Passed 5/18/2006 by 293-128 (Roll Call 172).  Our national debt at this time was $8.3 trillion.)

 

To compare the way you would vote with the way Congressman John Boozman voted on many more bills, see this link: http://www.wpaag.org/Boozman%20Voting%20Record%201.htm  or see below.

 

Compare Boozman Votes With The Way You Would Vote

 

These are the bills that we think conservatives would find controversial.

 

*H.R. 4954 Prescription Drug Plan – Ten Year Cost:  $350 Billion.  Uses taxpayer money to subsidize costs of prescription drugs for those on Medicare.  This was another step in the direction of socialized medicine.  Passed June 28, 2002 by 221-208.

 

Would you have voted for this bill when we had a national debt of  $6 trillion dollars?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*Budget Resolution – House Concurrent Resolution 95 authorized federal spending for fiscal 2004 of $1,861 billion dollars with a deficit of $558 billion and an increase in the public debt ceiling of $984 billion, for a total of $7.4 trillion  It  dwarfs the previous record federal deficit of  $290 billion in 1992.   Adopted April 11, 2003 by a vote of 216 to 211 (Roll Call 141) 

 

Would you have voted for yes or no on this bill with a national debt of  approximately $7.4 trillion?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*Global AIDS Initiative – H.R. 1298 authorized $15 billion to provide assistance to foreign countries for the years 2004 to 2008 for the purpose of combating HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.  Much of the funding was funneled through the Global AIDS Fund and other UN agencies and programs known for promoting abortion, as well as encouraging promiscuity through “sex education” courses supposedly aimed at preventing AIDS.  The House passed H.R. 1298 on May 1, 2003, 375 to 41  (RollCall 158).

 

On April 2, 2008 the $15 billion authorized in 2003 (abaove)  increased to $50 billion and shifted the program that had been established five years earlier to fill an “emergency” function to a long-term, sustainable plan including training 140,000 new healthcare workers. H.R. 5501 by a vote of 308-116 (Roll Call 158)

 

Considering we had a national debt of approximately  $7.4 trillion would you have voted for this bill that increased spending by $15 billion in 2003 and considering we had a national debt of  $9 trillion would you have voted for the $50 billion bill lin 2008?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*Labor – HHS – Education Appropriations.  Appropriated $470 billion for Labor, Health and Human Services & Education Departments for fiscal 2004, a 10 percent increase over fiscal 2003.  The United States Department of Education was only created during President Jimmy Carter’s administration and began operating on May 16, 1980.  Constitutionalists say the Constitution does not authorize a Department of Education and that education should be left to the states.  Every year the federal government has taken more and more control over education until now Obama is implementing national and United Nations international standards and curriculum in the schools. This bill included $55.4 billion for education. The House passed H.R.2660 July 10, 2003, 215 to 208 (Roll Call 353).

 

Would you have increased spending ($470 billion) for these departments by 10% considering we had a national debt of approximately $7.4 trillion?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*Agriculture Appropriations –  (H.R. 2673) appropriated $77.5 billion for agriculture, rural development and nutrition programs in fiscal 2004.  Over half of the money was earmarked for nutrition programs, including $28 billion for food stamps and $16 billion for school lunch and nutrition programs. Total spending for traditional agricultural programs is $26.89 billion, a 5 percent increase.  House passed H.R. 2673, July 14, 2003 347 to 64 (Roll Call 358).

 

By 2008 the farm bill had increased to $289 billion, including $10.4 billion BOOST in spending for nutrition programs such as food stamps.  (H.R. 2410 by a vote of 318-106 on May 14, 2008. (Roll Call 315)

 

Would you have voted for this $77.5 billion bill considering we had a national debt of approximately $7.4 trillion in 2003, and would you have voted for the $289 billion  farm bill in 2008 considering we had a national debt of $9 trillion?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*Millennium Challenge Account – Amendment to H.R 1950.  Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2004 & 2005 authorized $9.3 billion over the next three years for a new foreign aid program to promote the key development objectives described in the United Nations Millennium Declaration. According to the amendment, “It is, therefore, the policy of the United States to support a new compact for global development.  The House adopted this amendment to H.R. 1950 on July 16, 2003, by a vote of 368 to 52 (Roll Call 368).

 

Would you have voted for $9.3 billion to promote “a new compact for global development” to meet the objectives of United Nations$7.4 trillion? Millennium Declaration considering we had a national debt of approximately

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*North American Development – H.R. 254 would implement a U.S.-Mexico agreement that would allow the North American Development Bank that was established by NAFTA in 1993 to make below-market-loans.  H.R. 254 on March 25, 2004 by a vote of 377 to 48 (Roll Call 87).   [In essence this is using taxpayer money to fund foreign aid to Mexico in the form of below-market-loans.] They suspended the rules to pass this legislation.

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*Fiscal 2005 Budget Resolution (House Concurrent Resolution 393).  This resolution established broad spending and revenue targets for the next five years.  It called for $871.3 billion in “discretionary” spending and another $1.5 trillion in “mandatory ” spending for fiscal 2005.  Based on these targets, the “mandatory”  spending would increase by 5 percent over the year before.  The House adopted this resolution on March 25, 2004 by a vote of 215 to 212 (Roll Call 92).

 

Considering we had a national debt of approximately $7.5 trillion, would you have voted for this bill and increased mandatory spending by 5% at a time when we should have been decreasing our budgets year by year instead of increasing them.

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

Supplemental Appropriations.  This bill (H.R. 1268) would add another $82 billion to the federal budget for fiscal 2005. One objectionable (to some people) element of this bill is the REAL ID Act, which was added by the conference committee.  The REAL ID Act would authorize the federal government to impose national standards for driver’s licenses and thereby develop a national ID system. The House adopted this final version of H.R. 1268 May 5, 2005, by a vote of 368-58 (Roll Call 161)

 

With a national debt of $7.7 trillion, would you have added another $82 billion to the budget?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted Yes

 

*UN Dues Decrease.  A representative offered an amendment to cut the U.S. “contribution” to the United Nations by $218 million.  The House rejected the amendment on June 15, 2005, by a vote of 124-304 (Roll Call 253).

 

Considering we had a national debt of approximately 7.7 trillion, would you have voted for this amendment to cut the U.S. contribution to the United Nations by $218 million?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Voted  No

 

*CAFTA – H.R. 3045 implemented the proposed Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and expanded the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), including the job losses wrought by NAFTA.  CAFTA is intended by the Power Elite to be a steppingstone from NAFTA to the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas  (FTAA), which would include all of the countries of the Western Hemisphere. CAFTA would manage trade and would gradually exercise more powers on the road to a supranational government modeled after the European Union.  The House passed CAFTA on July 28, 2005, by a vote of 217-215 (Roll Call 443).

 

Boozman voted for these free trade agreements:

Peru Free Trade Agreement (H.R.3688) on November 8, 2007

Oman Free Trade Agreement H.R. 5684, July 20, 06

Singapore Free Trade Agreement  H.R. 2739 July 24, 2003

Chile Free Trade Agreement,  H.R. 2738 in 2003  

 

Would you have voted for  CAFTA and these other free trade agreements?  

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted Yes

 

*U.S. Treasury Borrowing.  A Representative offered an amendment to “eliminate the ability of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to borrow from the Treasury.  Rep Ron Paul stated on the floor, “I hope my colleagues join me in protecting taxpayers from having to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when the housing bubble bursts.”  The House rejected the amendment on October 26, 2005, by a  vote of 47-371 (Roll Call 544). 

 

Would you have voted Yes  for this amendment and ended the transfer of income from working Americans to government-sponsored enterprises.?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted No

 

*Defunding the NAIS, also called Animal ID, in the 207 Agriculture Appropriations H.R.5384.  A representative introduced this amendment to bar the use of funds in the bill to implement the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), a government program that would electronically track farm cattle and poultry, supposedly in hopes of preventing the spread of disease.    NAIS recommends, and some say mandates, attaching recommended tags with microchips for all animals that would allow the computerized recording of livestock movements from birth to the slaughterhouse. The extra cost of radio tags, scanners and filing reports when animals change premises would be crushing, some smaller producers say.  The House rejected this Amendment on May 23, 2006, by a vote of 34-389 (Roll Call 184). 

 

Would you have voted Yes to an amendment to exclude NAIS and prevent total invasion into the property rights of citizens? 

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted No and allowed NAIS funding.

 

*Global Climate Change.  The House voted on an amendment to strike from the bill (H.R. 2643) a mandatory program to combat global warming.  H.R. 2643 specifically says, “the sense of the Congress that there should be enacted a comprehensive and effective national program of mandatory, market-based limits and incentives” to reduce global greenhouse- gas emissions. An example of so called “market-based limits” would be to allow companies that want to exceed their allowable emissions output to buy permits or allowances from companies that choose not to use their full allotment [cap and trade concept].  The House rejected the Barton amendment, and thereby kept the global warming language in the bill, by a vote of 153-274  (Roll Call 555) on June 26,2007.

 

Would you have voted for this amendment to remove the global warming language in the bill and to prevent a cap and trade system that Obama himself said would cause energy costs to skyrocket?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted No

 

*Thought Crime – H.R. 1955.  The bill established a National Commission on the Prevention of Violent Radicalization and defines “violent radicalization” as “the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.”  The bill also states that “the Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.”  Critics charge that the bill is a thinly disguised attempt to criminalize dissent, based on the bill’s vague and open-ended language that could be used to trample basic rights to free speech and assembly, and turn legitimate dissent into thought crimes. The House passed H.R. 1955 by a vote of 404-6 (Roll Call 993) on October 23,2007.

 

Would you have voted for this bill? 

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted Yes

 

*The Peru Free Trade Agreement (H.R. 3688). Another in a series of free-trade agreements lik NAFTA.  However, the Committee on Ways and Means Report accompanying H.R. 3688 noted that “the Peru FTA has become the first U.S. free trade agreement to include, in its core text fully enforceable commitments by the Parties to adopt, maintain, and enforce basic international labor standards, as stated in the 1988 ILO Declaration onFundamental Principles and Rightsat Work.” The ILO, or International Labor Organization, is a UN agency. The House passed the bill by a vote of 285-132 (Roll Call 1060) on November 8, 2007.

 

Would you have voted for this bill that would bring the US under a UN agency standards? 

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted Yes

 

*Economic Stimulus of 2008,  H.R. 5140.  Provided about  $150 billion in economic stimulus, including $101.1 billion in direct payments of rebate checks (typically $600) to most taxpayers in 2008 and temporary tax breaks for businesses.  H.R. 5140 passed 385-35 on January 29, 2008, (Roll Call 25).   Creating money out of thin air and then spending the newly created money cannot improve the economy, at least not in the long term.  (If it could, why not create even more money for rebates and make every American a millionaire?)

 

Considering we had a national debt of approximately $9 trillion would you have voted for this bill?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted Yes

 

*Aid to Mexican Military –  H.R. 6028.  The House gave $1.1 billion to Mexico’s President Felipe Calderon to combat drug trafficking and organized crime, though Calderon refuses to help control the flow of illegal immigrants to the United States and Mexico’s government is notoriously corrupt. The House passed H.R. 6028 on June

10, 2008 by a vote of 311-106 (Roll Call 393).

 

Considering we had a national debt of approximately $9 trillion and growing , would you have voted for a $1.5 billion to go to Mexico?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted Yes

 

*Bailout Bill – Stabilization Act of 2008, H.R. 1424.  Authorized the Treasury Department to use $700 billion of taxpayer money to purchase troubled mortgage-related securities from banks and other financial-related institutions, on terms set by the Treasury Secretary, who now has authority to manage and sell those assets.  This bill establishes an unconstitutional merger of government with banks and businesses.  Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424) passed 263-171 (Roll Call 681) on October 3, 2008.

 

Considering we had a national debt of $9 trillion, would you have voted for $700 billion to bail out the banks?

YES ____        No _____    Boozman voted Yes

 

*Boozman told a Pulaski Tea Party Group in April that he likes some of  Obama’s new  health care legislation even though he has said  in a written statement that we need to “redo” the health care bill.  He was booed when he said he liked the part where parents can keep their children on their insurance plan until the children are twenty-six year old. 

 

Would you vote for parents to be able to keep their adult children up to the age of 26 on their insurance policy? 

 

YES ____        No _____    Boozman Said Yes

 

Posted by Women Action Group, April 8, 2010, at this link: http://www.wpaag.org/Boozman%20Voting%20Record%201.htm 

Also see Congressman Boozman No Shoo-In  for AR US Senate Race  http://www.wpaag.org/Boozman%20-%20No%20Shoo-In%20for%20US%20Senate.htm

 

Women Action Group

wpaagorg@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://debbiejpelley.c.topica.com/naanVkVabXovPaFXVbkcaeQCRr/

Glenn Beck and NeoCons

Faith, Hope, & Charity?

Leave a comment

FAITH, HOPE CHARITY
April 18,2010
Will the real Glenn Beck please stand up?

Dissecting Beck’s  latest shtick of explaining what made America great without any reference to the Enlightenment’s birth of individual freedom doesn’t shed light on the subject at all and in fact muddles.

Let’s compare his description to reality.

  1. Faith=belief in something without empirical evidence (passive) VS.  Reason = ideas based on logical, demonstrable evidence (active)
  2. Hope = wishful thinking (passive) VS Courage = bravery in the face of adversity (active)
  3. Charity = <in this context> altruism, sacrifice of self to others (passive) VS. Merit = earning one’s rewards (active) + Justice = fair treatment based on facts/truth

The making of America was anything but passive.  There of course were all sorts of passive factors such as the above, but the carving out of the wilderness, the fierce devotion to rational concepts such as individual liberty and the determination to escape the tyrannies of the past took enormous actions, risking life, limb and fortunes.

Beck doesn’t mention the Enlightenment or John Locke (inspirations to Founders) from whence such concepts as individual rights/liberties emanated and the Founders’ study and understanding of those new, rare ideas.

While Beck has done a yeoman’s job of explaining and exposing the Democrat/Progressive/Communists, he has omitted any mention of the Republican Neo-conservatives and only refers to them as “progressives” too.

Beck correctly identifies Saul Alinsky and his Industrial Areas Foundation method of organizing minorities, disenfranchised, parasitical “victims” into corrupt armies of usurpers, law breaking liars, cheats, and immoral paragons.  He proves Obama was one of the most accomplished “organizers” who seeks to destroy the republic, replacing it with full blown communism and forced redistribution.

Acceptance of Political Correctness (diversity, racism, multi-culturalism, etc.) has made all this possible.

The Republican Neo-cons on the other hand are followers of Zionist Leo Strauss (Chicago Univ… society should be led by a group of elite vanguards, whose job is to protect liberal society against the dangers of excessive individualism, and creating inspiring myths to make the masses believe that they are fighting against anti-democratic and anti-liberal forces.) “eternal war for eternal peace”, achieve goals by any means necessary, which he called the “noble lie” (“perpetual deception of the citizens by those in power is critical because they need to be led, and they need strong rulers to tell them what’s good for them.”). This tells you all there is to know about the “war on terror”.

Certain Evangelicals fell in with the neoconservatives early on and continue to give them credence.

  Why no mention from Beck?  The Neo-Cons tricked us into preemptive wars based on lies, murdering of millions of innocents, a phony “war on terror”, rendition, and TORTURE! Why is it our job to “spread Democracy” to people who don’t want it, when we are supposed to be a Republic, definitely not a democracy?

Is Beck a defender of the constitution or defender of the neo-conservative agenda which includes freedom killing laws (Patriot Acts, Military Commissions, police state tactics, open borders/illegal alien invasion, and globalism?

Due to his glaring Constitutional contradictions, Beck’s cover is crumbling fast, mostly because of what he doesn’t say.

His entreaty to “Question Boldly” rings hollow when he vehemently attacks anyone who boldly questions the government’s role in highly suspicious activities like 911, OKC, Waco, FEMA Camps, or Obama’s citizenship and educational credentials which are sealed from public knowledge.  According to Beck these bold questioners must be kooks and nutcases…why?  He has already proven the corrupt nature of the government.

Another obvious omission is Beck’s tax expenditure pie-chart discussion showing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid as at least 1/2 of our budget…no mention of 3 preemptive wars, foreign occupation in 130 countries, or the billions wasted on illegal alien invaders.

Beck likes to talk about the Founders and he did mention Washington’s admonition regarding no foreign entanglements; however he continues to perpetuate the myth that Israel is our friend and we are obligated to protect it.  How about some facts like Israel is the recipient of more U.S. foreign aid than all other nations combined? That they possess hundreds of nuclear missiles and have refused to sign multiple non-proliferation agreements (that Iran has signed)? That Israel leads the world in sex-slavery and perhaps human organ trafficking?   That they attacked our naval intelligence ship the USS Liberty in 1967 and killed 34 American sailors?  That they have for decades stolen our military/technology secrets and sold many of them globally?  That their ongoing Mossad spy network is responsible for untold deceptions and treachery?  These are friends?

Why has he not mentioned national and state sovereignty which is under attack? What about the militarization of law enforcement and other government agencies?  How about the blatantly un-American, unconstitutional Patriot Acts, Military Commissions Act, loss of Habeas Corpus & Posse Commitatus and other liberty stealing laws foisted upon us by the Republican Neo-cons?

Who made us the policemen of the world? What right do we have to blow the “cradle of civilization” all to hell because 19 Arabs (not Afghans, Iraqis, Iranians, Pakistanis, and Jordanians) supposedly perpetrated 911 all by their lonesome’s?  That is reason enough to destroy foreign people and lands in huge proportion?

Qui bono? Who benefits?  The military/industrial complex and Israel.  We fight their wars and fork over more in foreign aid and war machines than we do for all the rest.

While Beck has at least called for troops to come home from the 130+ countries we are occupying which would cut the “Defense” budget, he also has called to win or get out…he does get credit for that.  But the whole story needs to be told.  The political stranglehold on the U.S. held by the Democrat Communists and the Republican Neo-conservative Fascists must be recognized and defeated if our freedoms and Republic are to survive.

Beware the return of the Neo-cons, as well as the Progressives/Communists.

Barbara McCutchen

arkansasfreedom.net   

Expose, Rebuke, Return