Benefits for illegal aliens, Congresscritters, Federal Government, Neo-Cons, Republicans, U.S. Constitution

The Pusillanimous Republicans

Leave a comment

WILL THE REPUBLICAN LANDSLIDE REVERSE OBAMA’S WHOLESALE AWARDING OF AMNESTY TO ILLEGAL MEXICANS & OTM’S? November 16, 2014
Last evening on a Memphis radio talk show I was extended additional time to answer 2 questions. I will relate the first question which deals with the title of this missive.

The question was: WILL THE REPUBLICAN PARTY REVERSE OBAMA’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL & ILLEGAL AMNESTY FOR ULTIMATELY UP TO 25-35 MILLION ILLEGAL MEXICANS & OTM’S?

My answer was an immediate NO! The host gave the appearance of being startled by the answer.

Here is why the irrelevant Republican Party, irrelevant with one exception, undeclared preemptive murder & destruction commonly known as “Wars on Terrorism”. Currently the U.S. government has 7 and going for 9 of their murderous, hegemonic schemes.

I recorded the following phrases & words uttered on numerous occasions during 11 days after the last election by national government elected officials (Congress & Senate), other official Republican operatives and of course Fox Media.

By all official accounts the election was to dismember all of Obama’s Cultural Marxist Programs. Now, here are the reasons Republican’s rhetoric and a few Band-Aid approaches will be all that is found in the Republican powder keg.

Here are the words & phrases uttered by Republicans in the 11 days following the election that vividly demonstrate that the Republican “fix is in”:
1. Cooperative Partnership 6. Negotiate
2. Work with 7. Compromise
3. Consensus building 8. Measured
4. Consensus 9. Small
5. Bi-Partisan 10. Slowly
11. Make peace

Do any of you actually believe the philosophically & politically bankrupt Republicans will reverse the many criminal attacks orchestrated by Barak Obama which have shredded the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Treasury, & our former good name?

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

Agenda 21, city government offenses, City Politics, County Offenses, Forced redistribution

More incompetence/misfeasance by city & county??

Leave a comment

INCOMPETENCE, MALFEASANCE, MISFEASANCE, OR A COVER-UP? November 11, 2014

A 4% “shortfall” in city revenues does not explain why there are no specific reserve funds.

City Director Mike Lorenz, “I think the key thing we’ve got to look at is the General Fund.” You have that correct Director Lorenz—the General Fund serves as a universal dipping pool for politicians and bureaucrats accompanied by no citizen accountability, simply a slush fund.

The General Fund, in this case, supports Fire, Police, and Parks. Why isn’t there a specific funding mechanism earmarked for each of the above, along with safeguards, i.e. a reserve fund?

Then the matter of the shortage in the Fire & Police pension funds. Do they too come out of the General Fund? If so, this goes far beyond incompetence! The $7 million anticipated “shortfall” in Fire & Police Pensions is said to arrive in 4 years. Why wasn’t corrective action instituted years ago?

City government solution for the above: City Mgr, Gosack & the Directors want to tap into the street/sewer tax, i.e. diverting revenue and raising taxes—always government’s answer for mismanagement.

A 3 decade major sewer problem and the EPA threatening litigation and city management wants to divert 20% of the street/sewer tax in order to cover deficiencies in Police & Fire Pensions, in yet another government expanding program by inaugurating more U.N. Agenda 21 projects—bikeways, trailways, wayfinding signs, etc.

Coming under the above umbrella is a to be 9,500 city employee pay raise, a classic example of government spending money they don’t have. It must be said here, city government employees make on average 20%+ more than comparable private sector employees, along with many more government benefits.

Lest you are unaware—let’s talk lies & taxes.

Taxes first. With insulting arrogance and without citizens’ discussion or permission, city government sticks their corrupt hands deep into citizens’ pockets as it proposes to enact some or all of the following to satisfy budget “shortfalls”:

1. 25% increase in utility fees
2. 4% increase on water & sewer rates
3. Raise franchise fees 25% for telephone service, electric. Gas, and cable TV ¼%
4. Institution of a business license
5. More tax increases to upgrade the sewer system—wasn’t that what a portion of the 1% city street/sewer tax was to accomplish??

There were no cuts in the Mayor’s $250,000 yearly expense check (why?) Or doing away with the Downtown RR Car & Ferris Wheel. Ahh yes, the long vacant Mitsubishi building & property.

Now to the immoral, unethical, and grand theft orchestrated the by city & county government, i.e. the Marshal’s Museum was and is billed as a private enterprise by Richard Griffin, Sam Sicard, Westphal heirs, and others—and is anything but a “private” enterprise.
In 2007 the state (Arkansas taxpayers) plowed in $2.2 Million to the embryonic Marshal’s Museum and supplemented by $430,000 from Sebastian County. Fort Smith dumped in another $300,000+ the following fiscal year.
The $2.2 million state contribution can be traced to State Senator Jake Files. Was the Senator’s payoff for his $2.2 million legislative success the awarding of ownership of the nascent 8 field softball complex to him & his Democrat crony Lee Webb, along with 1 $million+ subsidy?
Now factor in the cost of the Marshal Museum Commemorative coin, also subsidized by taxpayers

July 23, 2010 Marshal Museum Director Jim Dunn requested and received $100,000 in cash from the city of Fort Smith for MM travel.
What is the stated constitutional, moral, and ethical authority for both city & county governments subsidizing a questionable activity billed as a “private” endeavor?

Who presently owns the fledgling Marshal’s Museum’s assets and what are the plans for the ultimate takeover by one or more government entities?

I wrote on 11/11/11 “Quickly, call the police, the speeding (numbers of entertainment venues) is heading into a financial boomerang, e.g.—the proposed 50,000 sq. ft. $50 million goliath known as the Marshal’s Museum.”

IT IS NOTED IN TODAY’S TIMES RECORD THE CITY HAS BEEN REGULARLY SUBSIDIZING THE MARSHAL’S MUSEUM”! HOW MUCH FUNDING, WHAT FORMS, FOR HOW LONG, TO WHOM AND ON WHOSE AUTHORITY?

Incompetence, malfeasance, misfeasance, or cover-up?

Don’t forget, the easiest job in the whole world is spending someone else’s money.

For more information regarding the city’s conduct on financial matters as just described log on to arkansasfreedom.net

Joe McCutchen

Agenda 21, city government offenses, City Politics

City considers spending on non-essentials while neglecting needed essentials

Leave a comment

FORT SMITH’S FUZZY MATH DOCTRINE: DIVERT—CREATE—OVERSPEND—EXPAND.

“AS LONG AS IT IS ADMITTED THAT THE LAW MAY BE DIVERTED FROM IT’S TRUE PURPOSE…THAT IT MAY VIOLATE PROPERTY INSTEAD OF PROTECTING IT, then,”……..Frederick Bastiat

CITY FINANCIAL MISMANGEMENT EMBEDDED IN A SEA OF QUASI HONESTY? November 4, 2014

The 1% Fort Smith city street tax was SPECIFICALLY designated for: construction of streets, bridges, existing waste water, sewer & drainage management!

In view of current Fort Smith city financial shortfalls and 3+ decades of ongoing discussions and threats of litigation by the EPA pertaining to major unresolved drainage problems in Fort Smith and the specificity of the 1% street tax that it demands, one would reasonably think at this point in time all drainage concerns would long since have been resolved, and for sure better streets. Not the case! Where did good management and the money go?! And by the way, Police & Fire Pensions are on the rocks. Where are the rainy day funds that would deal with such alleged shortfalls?

City Manager Ray Gosack offers no detailed explanation pertaining to the city’s financial shortfall. Gosack’s solution and apparently the City Directors, to satisfy the deficiencies is a balm that all politician/bureaucrats rely on—spend the totality of financial resources (no reserves), raise taxes and divert funds.

In this case a cogent example of the above—A 25% increase of existing utility fees…4% on water & sewer rates, raise franchise fees 25% for telephone service, electric, gas, & cable TV ¼ %. Also entertained by Gosack and Directors is the institution of a business license. The mandated upgrade of the city’s sewer system by the EPA is also in line for a tax raise. As previously mentioned, sewer deficiencies should have been resolved by the sewer systems portion of the 1% street tax.

Why is the City Board of Directors contemplating diverting 20% ($4 million) of the 1% street tax revenue to one new and 2 old programs and at the same time fanning the flames for multiple tax increases on residents?

1. The new–U.N. Agenda 21’s trails, bikeways, event nodes, wayfinding signs, quality of place, & a never ending list that grows government.
2. The old–Police & Fire pensions. Why would these two trust funds not be sacrosanct? Have the pension monies been spent on other projects or is it mismanagement? What was the previous source of funding for these pensions?
3. The Directors, in a vote buying scheme, are contemplating an across the board pay increase for 9,000+ city employees. Merit is not a consideration.

The city’s share of the county’s 1% tax ($11.68 million) was spent on what?

In view of the city’s alleged financial shortfalls, why would City Manager Gosack urge City Directors to entertain the idea of expanding government (costs and manpower) to launch a new campaign for a massive multi trails program to be used for not more than 0.1% of the urban population?

The city held 2 public hearings to gauge interest in the camouflaged trail scheme. The T.R. wrote “between the two meetings dozens of residents weighed in”. Dozens not hundreds…obviously not a success. Gosack would have city residents believe the opinions of a few dozen residents’ should reign supreme and speak for a metroplex of 150,000 residents.

What is really behind the sudden wave of interest in multi-purpose trails by a very select group representing 2 NGO’s (Non-Governmental Organizations), Trails & Greenways Committee & The Fort Smith Parks Commission—none of the aforementioned are elected, nor do they have any firsthand information regarding the city’s true financial status. Further reminding citizens that NGO’s remove citizen input & influence in dealing with the tenor of government business.

Two named Fort Smithians spoke in favor of the trail project: NGO Parks Commission Bryan Merry, “We really have to educate people”. To Merry, if you comprehend the ultimate goal of the trails project, which in all likelihood you do not, that would indeed be progress.

Merry & others should know and publicly admit that the trails project is a manifesto for the United Nations’ Agenda 21. Following Merry was a comment by Lorie Robertson, the Chair of the NGO Parks’ Commission, in a celebratory remark “The beauty of this is not being written into the main part of it”, referring to the extension of the1 cent sales tax? Apparently Robertson means that the voters will not read the back-end of the bill and will vote for the 1 cent bill, giving city government a carte blanche approval to spend 20% of the street/sewer tax to use as they deem on a nefarious trail program and a new source of funding for Fire & Police pensions, and perhaps more.

In the grand scheme, the recent extreme show of interest by City Manager Gosack and his sycophants is nothing more than a subterfuge to continue their pursuits of the United Nations’ Agenda 21, without revealing government’s real course of action.

Later, At Large Director Pam Weber said, “I really sense the community wants the trail system”. The city in alleged financial stress and Director Weber concludes that the opinions of 3-4 dozen people should decide for 150,000 residents.

The phrase “I sense” belongs in the same scrap heap where political “visions” & “values”, et al, lie.

An Agenda 21 cover-up—do the City Directors know what they are involved in? Probably not. It appears they have taken the bait thrown out by Gosack and have not taken the opportunity to research precisely what Agenda 21 entails and its goals which lead to the ultimate devastation of citizen’s freedoms and individual rights.

The misguided attitudes that the City Directors are now demonstrating is reminiscent of Alice in Wonderland, i.e.; all the city streets are fixed, the EPA has withdrawn their complaint, meaning waste water, overflow & sewer concerns have been corrected and voila everything is hunky dory in Marshall Town.

Really? Is it the intent of the City Directors under the spell of City Mgr. Gosack to tap into the city’s very specific 1% street tax and deploy millions of dollars, expand city government, give unconstitutional across the board raises to city employees, while subsidizing an array of freedom-killing Agenda 21 programs?

City leaders are proposing to neglect much needed citizen necessities in order to fund non-essential pack & stack projects offered up by the United Nations’ Agenda 21.

When you hear the word Sustainability be very wary. Sustainability is the call to arms by Agenda 21 luminaries.

Is city government engaged in or about to be engaged in the practice of malfeasance and/or misfeasance?

Quick, comprehensive websites explain Agenda 21 for those who care to learn; www.americanpolicy.org and http://securetherepublic.com/arkansas/?s=Agenda+21

Joe McCutchen

P.S. Are we to believe these officials conduct their own finances in such a fashion….if so, they are hopelessly in debt and maxed on their credit cards and the debt collectors are at the door.

arkansasfreedom.net

city government offenses, City Politics, Forced redistribution

Forced mass medication is Unconstitutional

Leave a comment

Unconstitutionalities and medical malpractice practiced by the Fort Smith city government. October 25, 2014

Residents of Ward 4 held a townhall meeting Thursday night and one of the residents posed the question “Why they voted (city Directors) to fluoridate the city’s drinking water?” City voters have turned down the question of fluoridating city waters on 2 prior occasions and projects the question, why contaminate the country’s best water supply?

At-Large Director Kevin Settle responded “The state passed it, not the Board, so we have to follow state law”. “We actually had an Attorney General’s opinion that said state law overrode what the citizens voted for”. Note that A.G. McDaniel only rendered an opinion.
Accepting A.G. McDaniel’s opinion was a mealy-mouth response by Settle to the equally mealy-mouth opinion by McDaniel. By the way who wrote this unconstitutional & illegal law?

I submit that neither Settle nor McDaniel are demonstrating they fully understand the documents they swore to “uphold & defend”.
Clearly, both of their positions are unconstitutional pertaining to the U.S. & Arkansas State Constitutions. We are a country with a Constitution and Bills of Rights which absolutely define what is and what is not constitutional. Where is the proof that forced mass medicating of Fort Smith residents is in the Constitution?

Laws do not decide for themselves if they are valid.

Law holds value to those who create it, e.g. in this case, Delta Dental (an insurance company) and those Ark. State legislators which accepted money & perks allegedly going to their respective campaign funds for their support of Delta Dental. Another example of unbridled and wholesale vote buying in the Ark. State Legislature.

Did you know the purchase of Sodium Fluoride in medicinal form (liquid & tablet) requires a written prescription from licensed Ark. physicians?

Four things should be immediately addressed in meaningful terms:

1. A declarative statement from the F.S. City Board & the City Manager that they refuse to implement a fluoride mandate.
2. If the state of Arkansas proposes to engage in some sort of force (legal or policing agencies), and they would not dare, but in case they did they would quickly become a national laughing stock.
3. After all, dispensing fluoride on the authority of the F.S. City Government is a violation of national and state law, i.e. practicing medicine without a proper license.
4. Delta Dental (an insurance company) is subsidizing the start-up costs of adding fluoride to the water system. Why? After the start-up Fort Smith taxpayers assume the burgeoning tax liability.

As stated by Director Settle, itappears they are more than willing to go along with the state legislature, no meaningful questions asked, and continue to be a practicing part of the politicians’ & bureaucrats’ protection racket, disregarding the wishes of the citizens.

Kindest regards,
Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

Agenda 21, city government offenses, City Politics, Globalization, Police State

“Conspiracy” vs. the Facts

Leave a comment

NO IDEA AND AN ALLEGED CONSPIRACY VS. THE FACTS. October 15, 2014

My article of 9/11/14 pointed to the public fact that Fort Smith Police Chief Kevin Lindsey belonged to one or more international agencies (NGO’s) tied directly to United Nations’ Agenda 21.

International defined: between or among nations; pertaining to the relations between nations.

It must be mentioned again that Non-Governmental Organizations are appointed by elected officials, shirking their sworn Constitutional obligations, while at the same time selling out citizen ownership of government, citizen freedoms and direction of said government and are being buried under an avalanche of unconstitutional directives.

An email received from City Director Keith Lau 9/17/14 stated “I have no idea what you are talking about”, at which time I sent him a personal email detailing a list of questions regarding Chief Lindsey and the City Board of Directors. No response until a more detailed article was sent out 10/13/14. Director Lau’s response was immediate, signed respectfully and stated “I have no desire to spend any time on the aforementioned (Chief Lindsey) or any United Nations’ Agenda 21 conspiracy concerns you may have about the police department or Fort Smith city government”.

Is Director Lau denying or through political fear or ignorance, refusing to admit or discuss the fact that the Fort Smith city government is knowingly or unknowingly buried under Agenda 21 protocols?

Fact 1. Speaking to the League of Women Voters 9/8/14 Chief Lindsey stated, “the first, he said, is having a third party international accreditation agency (ICA) review the department’s policies, protocols every 3 years”. What protocols and upon whose authority?
Fact 2. Lindsey again, “A lot of these policies are best practices regarding training”. What training & purpose & where?

Fact 3. The city of Fort Smith belongs to THE COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT (CALEA). CALEA make adjustments whenever necessary to meet a body of international accepted standards.

Fact 4. The FSPD was the first in the state of Arkansas to join CALEA. Another unelected NGO, one of several the FS city government has turned over to other agencies, again diverting their sworn delegated authority to unelected tactical overlords, accompanied by considerable expense to private sector citizens. Membership and continuation fees are an integral part of the contract CALEA demands. CALEA banters the phrase “HARMONIZED STANDARDS” (internationally everything is the same)

Fact 5. Citizens, where do you believe the following terms were hatched; Quality of Place, Sense of Place, Event Nodes, Bikeways & Wayfinding Signs? All come and hundreds more from the Agenda 21 Sustainable lexicon

Fact 6. The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) of which Chief Lindsey is a member, works directly with the United Nations and has acquired “Consultative Status”. This was accomplished in the 1970’s.

Fact 7. The Fort Smith police department is militarized.

Fact 8. No citizen accountability pertaining to the political activities of the FSPD.

Why is the city government of Fort Smith, AR collaborating with international agencies and why the cover-up?

Two quotes from Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn: “The federal government should have no role in arming local law enforcement agencies. The Founders saw no role for the federal government in state & local police forces—None!” “We are on dangerous ground of undermining the very principles that built the country”.

And this quote from my friend, constitutional scholar, Mike Gaddy sums it up:

“All who believe in individual liberty and that sovereignty lies with the individual rather than any form of government, have all seen it: that look of incredulity when we provide factual cognitive evidence that someone’s strongly held belief, based on pure emotion is incorrect. We watch as that belief transforms the person into attack mode. Intellectual discussion suddenly reverts to name calling and other behavior commonly found in the second grade classroom. Instead of an intellectual equal we are maliciously transformed into anarchists, conspiracy nuts, racists, homophobes or some other derogatory term. When one’s intellectual capabilities have been exceeded or sacred cow attacked retaliation by derision is favorite mode of redress. When the emotional side of the brain takes command, cognitive discourse must yield”.

The city of Fort Smith appears to be a captive of the globalists.

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

Agenda 21, city government offenses, Globalization, Police State

Freedom-Gobbling Globalism on the March

Leave a comment

Below is a letter sent to F.S. City Director Keith Lau October 8th and no response as of this date, and none expected. October 13, 2014

It seems apparent that some of the City Directors are not aware of the city’s international entanglements orchestrated by at least 3 hired guns, City Mgr. Ray Gosack, Chief of Police Kevin Lindsey, & Parks Director Mike Alsup.

In addition to Gosack’s & Lindsey’s heavy-handedness by putting the FSPD in the throes of the United Nation’s Agenda 21, along comes additional Agenda 21 proposed projects directed by 2 unelected Fort Smith NGO’s (Non-governmental Organizations), Frontier Metropolitan Planning Organization & newly resurrected, The Trails & Greenways Committee. Is Frontier Engineering a functional part of the Frontier Metropolitan Planning Organization? If so, what?

Why the sudden fervor for “Wayfinding” signs, concrete 12 ft. wide river trails, draped with luxurious lighting, landscaping, a bridge, and oh yes, benches…recall Alsup using the Agenda 21 expression, “Event Nodes” for benches & now reappearing in usage by Frontier Engineering. Who directed Alsup to use Agenda 21’s phrase “Event Nodes”?

Accompanying a plethora of multi-purpose trails & “wayfinding” signs, the ultimate goal is the creation of 88 miles of multi-use trails; followed by an equally financially overdone multiple option bicycle trails.

Alsup and the City Government are in the process of complying with U.N.’s Agenda 21’s Grand Scheme by dispensing eye-candy to a super minority of citizens, i.e. those who use trails & are taking the lure subliminally as if they were the decision makers, while being used as Agenda 21 bait.

The points of emphasis are: Chief Lindsey & his police department are members of multiple international bodies, i.e. 501c3 government unions. The trails, bikeways, & wayfinding signs are all part & parcel of Agenda 21 to create high density urban populations, significantly reduce modes of transportation, reduce the availability of certain foodstuffs, theft of riparian rights and all sorts of private property rights, the use of natural resources (e.g. water & mineral rights) gradually directing & demanding citizens live in stack-em & pack-em high rise complexes, eroding individual freedoms that are taken by force in the dark of night (regulations, laws), e.g. Lindsey’s overreach.

Recall the words & phrases currently ensconced in Fort Smith city government jargon, but not limited to, e.g. Quality of Place, Sense of Place, Event Nodes, Bikeways, & Wayfinding Signs, all created by U.N.’s Agenda 21 and passed down through bureaucracies, agencies & NGO’s, while subverting the English language and bypassing the Arkansas & U.S. Constitutions.

Back to Parks Director Mike Alsup, held 2 meetings for Ft. Smith bicyclists and extended a very benevolent hand, compliments of private sector taxpaying producers, allowing bikers to determine what type of trails they desired and could choose from 1 to 3. Only a few dozen, if that many, showed up to make the determination. We live in an urban area with a population 150,000–200,000 and the city by stealth is allowing 2-3 dozen bicyclists to make such a huge financial decision. More Eye-candy for the trusting, gullible taxpayers. These are all cover-ups for the implementation of the real Agenda 21 protocols.

The Fort Smith City Government is showing itself to be a venal institution and not much more than operatives for the United Nations & Federal Government, whether they know it or not. Citizen rights and citizen control have been taken from us by deception by the likes of Gosack, Lindsey, & Alsup, and the City Directors who apparently have no concern pertaining to who controls city government.

Why is it that the F.S. Times Record never questions or investigates any of these freedom-taking expensive schemes?
Joe McCutchen

P.S. The city’s hue & cry—Citizens, re-up the 1 cent road tax that enables the city establishment to use the road tax to subsidize all sorts of non-road enterprises.
arkansasfreedom.net
Keith Lau
Fort Smith City Director

Director Lau, October 8, 2014

You are the only one who responded by email to my statements, inquiries, and questions pertaining to City Police Chief Kevin Lindsey’s involvement/membership in one or more international (global) entities. I do not know whether you have an interest in this matter or your question was designed to make me appear over the top.

I have compiled a substantial amount of information regarding 501c3’s, all comprised of police chiefs and/or retired chiefs and other government present & past employees. These groups in no way represent the citizens of any given 40,000+ population in any given area.

Fort Smith citizens have unknowingly ceded without forethought, information, accountability or permission, the control, ownership & direction, in this case the Fort Smith City Police Department. Police departments as you know are to be designed, directed, maintained, equipped, and funded by the city they represent, not some, in this case, international body or bodies.

These groups set the protocols, training procedures, communication techniques, and ultimately leadership.

Protocols simply defined are: rules and instruments of etiquette and order in diplomatic or military affairs.

Listed below are some random questions I have posed regarding the FSPD’s membership in at least, I believe, 3 international entities. There are other significant questions.

As you should know, I have previously sent emails to the Fort Smith City Directors pertaining to Lindsey’s international involvements that I know of then there was my certified letter to Mayor Sandy Sanders mailed on Sept. 15, 2014 and delivered the next day and is yet to be picked up.

The performance of the FS city government in this matter is indeed one to be feared—an information black-out.

The questions:
What countries belong? (International is global)

Why is the city of Ft. Smith aligned with one or more international bodies?

Is there any official relationship between the city of Ft. Smith, more specifically the FSPD, to any government policing/enforcement agencies, i.e. ATF, FBI, Homeland Security, DOJ, FEMA, etc.?

What is the cost of membership in CALEA, IAPC, & IAA? CALEA “makes adjustments whenever necessary to meet a body of internationally accepted standards”. (their website—do you understand the brevity of this phrase? LOCAL has become a national myth!)

Who funds, specifically?

How many trips & dates has Chief Lindsey made to national or international conventions of CALEA, IAPC, & IAA, etc.? And source of funding?
Why did all or parts of the city government transfer citizen ownership, control and direction of the FSPD to an international body? It is my belief that there are Directors and city insiders who are not aware of the magnitude of this issue.

Why weren’t citizens informed beforehand regarding, at that juncture, the potential transfer of protocols, training, armaments, etc. to an international body?

Is the FSPD now an official arm of a state, national or international police force, or an organization that holds sway over city police departments?

Are the 3 aforementioned policing organizations described as non-government organizations (NGO’s) and classified as 501c3’s?

The International Accreditation Agency, of which Chief Lindsey is a member, is engaged in the development of International Harmonized (in government-speak) Standards? Harmonized in this case means that every city police department is to be reduced to a common denominator. Why?

CALEA, of which FS & Chief Lindsey are members, state they are a Credentialing Authority….what is and for what purpose?
Citizens pay Chief Lindsey’s & his department’s salaries; therefore why has he gone outside the bounds of city ownership to align himself (allegiance) and the PD with an international body?

From what few facts that can be ascertained at this juncture, membership in these multiple organizations is perhaps an outright betrayal of the trusting citizens of Fort Smith.

It was stated recently by nationally acclaimed economist Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, “A generation of Americans have been born into a police state in which privacy and constitutional protections no longer exist”.

The question now becomes Director Lau, do you and any of the other City Directors have the interest, desire, or the understanding to delve into this profound happening in our city pertaining to the aforementioned subject? The answers you would get from City Mgr. Gosack and Police Chief Lindsey would not be acceptable, they would be self-serving. Facts are what is needed.

Kindest regards,
Joe McCutchen

Agenda 21, city government offenses, Globalization

Cities falling prey to Agenda 21

Leave a comment

GOVERNMENT DICTUMS BUSILY CREATING AN AMORPHOUS MASS OF CITIZENS BY ULTIMATELY RELIEVING THEM OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS.
September 29, 2014

The genesis of government NGO’s and their unconstitutional progeny, i.e. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO’s), Regional Planning Organizations, to name 2 out of literally hundreds that are obliterating citizens’ rights.

Two new buzzwords and accompanied intended practices synthesized by DC & the United Nations think-tanks, are then spun down to Governors, then filtered down to city governments who shirk their responsibilities by delegating government responsibility to unelected groups who busily implement Agenda 21’s, custom crafted programs to ensnare the unsuspecting, trusting public.

The words & phrases already ensconced in Fort Smith city government, but not limited to, are “Quality of Place”, “Sense of Place”, & “Event Nodes”. The 2 new doublespeak phrases are: “Bikeway”& “Wayfinding Signs” that sound so inviting but like the spider said to the fly “come into my parlor”.

The clever buzzwords are all directed toward creating & sustaining Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s), i.e. an MPO, which again are unelected bodies dedicated to carving away the constitutional & God-given rights of American citizens.

Aspiring bureaucrats & politicians, and some that are already bathing in that aspiration, are more than ready to launch new NGO endeavors, e.g. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO’s).

As the U.N. and the federal government release their buzzwords that serve as start points for the creation of new NGO’s/MPO’s by individuals who are already enmeshed in “something for nothing” government programs conducted under the aegis of Non-Profits, known as 501C3’s & C4’ that are anything but non-profits and is the magnet that draws the “something for nothing” crowd to the NGO’s/MPO’s. Individuals and/or corporations can & do create cushy outlandish salaries & perks for themselves and the ruling Board, all subsidized by unknowing taxpaying citizens.

In addition (it can’t be stated too often) the NGO’s/MPO’s are unelected bodies devoid of citizen governance. Many if not most command a regional self-induced authority that further dilutes & decimates citizens’ input into government proceedings. All designed, ultimately to implement the U.N.’s Agenda 21’s stack & pack, removal of transportation choices, to implement “land use policies”, greenways, “transportation justice”, sanctuaries, public/private partnerships, natural resource management, the elimination of various food stuffs, and literally hundreds more buzzwords that identify Agenda 21.

Formation of a regional “Wayfinding Sign” task force began Thursday at a meeting of the Frontier Metropolitan Planning Organization replete with representatives from area towns. The group heard from Mike Malone, President of the N.W. Arkansas Council, on “how they got it done” & the “lessons learned along the way”.

Malone, is a veteran product of Big Government. In addition to the above organization, Malone spent years in Washington, DC employed by the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, and worked for 6 years in the White House for President Clinton. Additional government baggage, he is also the Vice-Chair of the Arkansas Lottery Commission, another public board not accountable to the citizens.

Sloshing around for years in D.C., Little Rock, and Fayetteville he certainly knows “how to get it done”.

Frontier MPO executive Director Diane Morrison, in a T.R. article 9/26/14, declared the Frontier MPO would hammer out details of the sign plan and would be in place by Dec. 2015. Who pays?

Again, what & who is the Frontier MPO, their source of funding, and the authorizing authority? Is this another case of the Fort Smith city government delegating city government functions to a non-elected high-dollar funding operation? NGO’s, of which Frontier MPO is one, are embedded and proliferating in every phase of society, from city government to infiltrating foreign countries, e.g. Ukraine.
Citizens should be made aware of what “Wayfinding Signs” are and direct their thoughts to the city Mayor and their respective Board Member, not to some high-blown nebulous organization with inflated tax-funded salaries.

As stated before, NGO’s, in this case the Frontier MPO, are hijacking private citizen determination as to the direction of city government and in some cases regional activities.

Fort Smith, in another about to be embryonic Agenda 21 offering is on the horizon & called “Bikeway”, designed to forcibly encircle citizens into densely populated urban areas. The end result of this plan, as previously stated, is to drastically reduce the number of travel options citizens have. Note the proliferation of proposed ideas to create miles & miles of high dollar bike trails. City government does not appear to have concern for initial cost & maintenance.

Did you know that there are already two governing organizations Governor’s Bicycle Advisory Group (GBAG) and the Arkansas Bicycle Technical Advisory Committe (TAC) consisting of reps from 20+ government agencies?

Does anyone believe that City Manager Gosack, his underlings, or the Mayor & Official Board gave rise to the hundreds of doublespeak buzzwords that are now the vocabulary of the federal government and the United Nations and busily being diffused into city government? If so, you are tailor-made for government slavery. Note: 50,000 in population is the stated number needed to qualify for MPO status.

Frontier MPO Executive Director Diane Morrison is chomping at the bit to get their teeth in this unconstitutional, freedom-taking scheme.

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

City Politics, Cultural Marxism destroying United States, Education Morass, Forced redistribution, Police State

The Mongrelization of America

Leave a comment

Mongrel—any plant, animal, or thing of mixed breed or elements.

September 24, 2014

The U.S., fast-tracking toward a mongrel society, otherwise known as “Diversity”—and by design—to “Harmonize (reducing all Americans to a common denominator).

Diversity—A germ that was unleashed on American citizens by the Federal Government who willfully refuse to enforce the Constitution & rule of law and is the practice that is killing America.

Third & fourth world hordes, legal & illegal, continue their massive invasions to America, replete with a welcoming committee composed of government officianados at every level, e.g. President Obama, the Cultural Marxist Democrat Party, and of course the irrelevant warlock Republican Party.

The U.S. Constitution, accompanied by 8 USC, Sections 1324a, 1324c, 1325, & 1459, demand that our borders be secure and illegal aliens dealt with in a court of law. More evidence of selective law enforcement by the 16 federal law enforcement agencies. Is it ironic that one of the agencies, the U.S. Marshall Service, showed up at a 9/19/14 naturalization ceremony in Fort Smith for 78 immigrants and shook down American citizen spectators? Why aren’t these so-called public servants stationed on the southern border? What the U.S. Marshalls were engaged in is commonly called “conditioned response”—get the citizens used to seeing gun-toting government employees everywhere their eyes may turn and to being frisked. Recall the Marshall Service involvements in Ruby Ridge, Waco, the Bundy Ranch, and other such questionable incidents.

Now to the matter of mongrelization. Yesterday Times Record 9/23/14 headline: “School boss notes changes”. What are the changes?

Recall Fort Smith Superintendent Benny Gooden, famous for his unlawful positions on illegal immigration, “We will take all we can get”, referring to illegal Mexicans & OTM’s. So what did boss man Gooden’s bravado help bring us?

These statistics say it all & are only a microcosm:
1. The Fort Smith school system (international) 14,300 students
2. 2004-05 school year = 56.5% Caucasian student body
3. 2013-14 school year = 43.3% Caucasian student body
4. The above numbers represent a 13.2% reduction in the Founding stock, replaced by 3rd & 4th world nationals that travel on the backs of the diminishing white population, particularly the middleclass.
5. 5,000 of the students live in non-English speaking environments
6. 72% last year qualified for “free lunches”. Percent of whites receiving not given.
7. 30% was the number of “free lunches” in 1991.

The “Boss” speaks topically in educanto buffoonery pertaining to “Benchmarks”. He states the Fort Smith Public Schools ACT score is 21.9 while the national average is 21. The question arises, are the 5,000 students being raised in non-English speaking environments being included in the ACT score? It is highly doubtful.

As whites are becoming more submerged daily in our own country by legal & illegal 3rd & 4th world invading armadas, are we to believe these folks (mostly illiterate) can and will sustain what Caucasians have created & sustained, i.e. the most productive society in the history of man based on our Founding Principles? If the answer is yes, will their spokespersons tell us how and by what means?

Furthermore; how long before corrupt politicians & bureaucrats kill the economic golden goose, i.e. the dwindling American middleclass that provides most of the unearned largesse forcibly taken & dispensed to the 3rd & 4th world masses?

By the way, does anyone ever recall being asked by any politician or bureaucrat what your thoughts and positions are re: providing meals, healthcare, food stamps, rent, computers, language translators, cell phones, free prenatal care/services, ad infinitum to the unapologetic thankless hordes of legals & illegals?

Public schools and its employees are nothing more than money pits. In view of the stark data shown above, the F.S. School Board (actually the Boss) is planning a $60-75 million high school campus in Chaffee Crossing which can only be labeled OVERKILL.

The economic producers that subsidize the Overkills are being attacked at every degree on the compass rose. Will Americans ever awaken to the ongoing highway robbery orchestrated by politicians & bureaucrats?

Joe McCutchen
arkansasfreedom.net

Cultural Marxism destroying United States, Forced redistribution, Globalization, Politicrats

Open borders, globalist bureaucrats in action

Leave a comment

September 20, 2014
More bureaucratic orating that does not serve the American republic or middleclass Americans.

The orating is compliments U.S. District Judge Robert T. Dawson & UAFS Chancellor Paul Beran in their participation naturalizing 78 immigrants from a multitude of countries.

First, some salient facts regarding the financial stability of the United States:

1. The presence of 25-35 million illegal 3rd World foreign nationals, not the government lie of 12 million.
2. 97 million American citizens unemployed.
3. 48 million American citizens on Food Stamps. This figure does not include the millions of illegals here and coming here that are on every form of welfare made available to American citizens, plus those crafted specifically for illegals.
4. Approaching an $18 Trillion national debt and $100 Trillion in unfunded mandates.
5. Multiple undeclared mid-east wars at a cost of $3-$5 Trillion.
6. The GAO estimates that 50% of American citizens are on some form of welfare.
7. All forms of U.S. government growing at an astonishing rate.
8. The most troubling is the fact émigrés legal & illegal are displacing the foundation of American society, i.e. the middleclass.

Yet, the 78 new immigrant American citizens are welcomed by Judge Dawson & Chancellor Beran as if they were an endangered species. Simply put, more & bigger government, which these two no doubt approve. The Democrat Party’s open borders policy & the Republican Party’s reluctance to challenge, coupled to the 1 ½ million legals entering yearly simply is not sustainable. All by design.

Note these newly minted citizens are from 3rd & 4th world countries accompanied by 1 or 2 eastern Europeans. Odds are that most are already on some form of American welfare.

Note the dress of the new citizens (front page Times Record 9/20/14) only three, from the photo, were dressed appropriately for such a somber occasion. Compare these folks with the immigrants that arrived at Ellis Island in the 1900’s debarking from ships they had been on for weeks living in filth & squalor, yet as they placed their feet on U.S. soil the men were in suits, ties and fedoras of their native culture, and the women in mostly homemade & pressed frocks & hats, accompanied with acres of smiles, no expectation of welfare, & champing at the bits for the American challenge (hard work and individual freedom to keep what you earn), glaringly absent in the 78.. The arrivals in the 1900’s were some of the reasons the U.S. achieved global preeminence.

Compare the two sets. Do you believe the recent millions of 3rd worlders invading our shores accompanied by applause from bureaucrats & politicians will strive to achieve what the émigrés of yesteryear brought?

Federal Judge Robert T. Dawson, an unelected position with a lifetime lock opined the following, “I submit to you that one of our strengths is that we are a nation of immigrants”.

A brief history of the settling of America—we are not a nation of immigrants—we are a nation with immigrants. Absent a founding group or majority it would be no nation at all, just an assortment of peoples of assorted races, religions, nationalities, etc. and would be united only by their presence on the same piece of turf.

American history shows that we had a distinct Founding culture and a homogeneous culture for the most part. 80% Brits, 20% Scots, German & Dutch and overwhelmingly Christian, 98% Protestants. The aforementioned was sustained throughout the settling process and until the mid 1960’s. Observe the downward spiral since that point in time.

These were the settlers that defined the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America until very recently; she was not the recipient of unbridled immigration invasions, both legal & illegal.

Judge Dawson continues with a nebulous statement “We all started from somewhere else, so I am proud to be here today”. Statement does not deserve comment.

Enter globalist, open-borders activist and taxpayer subsidized world traveller, UAFS Chancellor Paul Beran, another unelected bureaucrat feasting at the taxpayer trough. He offered up this educanto jewel, “This ceremony reinforces the fact that we are serving a global community”. This statement is documentation he is an enemy of U.S. sovereignty and a bonafide open-borders advocate.

The aforementioned 2 bureaucrats seemingly have no regard for middleclass Americans who are the bulwark of our republic. Chancellor Beran is an open-border & globalist enthusiast & mouthpiece for global governance. Judge Dawson, alleged to be a follower & supporter of the rule of law, has never taken a public stance against the illegal Mexican & OTM invasions. Is the Judge a Democrat?

As eluded to in past pieces, regarding some of the sobering activities of the Ft. Smith police, has once again reared its ugly head. There were 3 police at the doorway of the naturalization proceedings and 3 U.S. Marshalls shaking down resident American citizens. Police state? Did they shake down the 78?

Before remaking the world, Americans should check the state of their own liberties and opportunities. (Fred Reed)

Joe McCutchen

Expose, Rebuke, Return